Recent Posts
- ICANN’s new conferencing software has a webcam security bug
- ICANN explains how .org pricing decision was made
- CEO lost millions on Manhattan apartment deal just days before AlpNames went dark
- Zimbabwe wants to rebuild its domain market from scratch
- Net 4 India gets brief reprieve from ICANN suspension
- Luxembourg tops 100,000 .lu domains
- China domain smaller than expected
- Charities “could move to .ngo” if .org prices rise
- Airline hit with $230 million GDPR fine
- After five-year wait, .madrid domains coming this month
- Foreigners mostly speak foreign, ccTLD study finds
- .icu joins the million-domains club in one year, but spam triples
- Cloudflare “bug” reveals hundreds of secret domain prices
- .org now has no price caps, but “no specific plans” to raise prices
- CentralNic boosts reseller biz with $11.3 million Hexonet buy
- What happens in Vegas… gets released in .vegas
- ICANN gives .bj to Jeny
- 1.8 million UK grandfathers die after Nominet deadline hits
- .amazon frozen AGAIN as endless government games continue
- Afilias buys the other half of .global
- What time is it? For ICANN, even that can be a controversial question
- auDA reveals cut-off date for 2LD priority
- Nic.br wins dot-brand from Afilias
- Uniregistry offers dating-inspired buy-now domains
- .CLUB lowers premium prices to sell through registrars
- auDA chair racks off after just 18 months
- ICANN launches cash-for-kids scheme
- After $30 million deal, is a .voice gTLD now inevitable?
- Watch John Oliver take down voice.com’s buyer
- Record-breaking $30 million domain sale was financed by cryptocurrency
- .gay not coming out this year after all
- New gTLD registry is latest billion-dollar unicorn
- PwC wants to be your Whois gatekeeper
- .wang cut off with Chinese red tape
- This latest Chinese bubble could deflate ccTLD growth
- Dodgy registrars could be banned from .org promotions
- India’s largest registrar goes insolvent, gets suspended
- ZADNA CEO suspended for “hybrid misconduct”
- Brand kills off gTLD that is actually being USED
- Time for some more ICANN salary porn
- Smaller registrars say .uk release is biased towards the Big Boys
- New gTLDs slip again in Q1
- Second-level .au domains ARE coming soon
- .icu gets China nod as it tops 900,000 regs
- These 27 companies have ditched the .com for their dot-brand
- These are the 10 most-used dot-brands
- GRS has lost three million domains since Famous Four died
- Four presidents slam .amazon decision
- MMX makes $100,000 .luxe premium sale
- Major registries posting “fabricated” Whois data
Yes, .co domains are subject to the UDRP
I’ve been getting a fair bit of search traffic over the last few days from people evidently wondering whether .co domain names are subject to the same UDRP rules as .com, so I thought I’d answer the question directly.
Yes, they are.
For avoidance of doubt, I’ve just talked to .CO Internet’s director of marketing, Lori Anne Wardi, who had just talked to the registry’s policy people.
She told me that .co domains are subject to the exact same ICANN UDRP as .com.
If you’re a .co registrant, you’re bound to the policy the same as you are in .com. If you’re a trademark holder, you file a complaint in the same way.
The only difference at the moment is that .CO Internet has contracted with only one UDRP provider, WIPO, but Wardi said that more providers may be signed up in future.
[…] letter points out, as I have previously, that .co is subject to the UDRP on the same terms as other TLDs including .com. The outcome of a […]