Recent Posts
- EFF recommends against new gTLDs
- auDA chair quits days before vote to fire him
- Crocker: no date on next new gTLD round
- Donuts to complete Rightside acquisition tonight
- MMX says .vip renewals running at 75%
- auDA now looking to outsource .au registry
- .blog tops 100,000 names, 66,500 blogs
- Attendance dips for ICANN in Johannesburg
- Empowered Community makes first symbolic exercise of power
- CentralNic brings back old CFO
- Short .vegas domains go on sale
- GoDaddy flips hosting business for $456 million
- Domain growth slows a lot in Q1
- Governments slammed for overreach as Amazon wins gTLD appeal
- ICANN gives the nod to Donuts-Rightside merger
- Junk drop cuts .xyz in half, .top claims volume crown
- Over 750 domains hijacked in attack on Gandi
- ICANN chair paid $114,000 last year
- Could the next new gTLD round last 25 years? Or 70 years?
- auDA explains secretive new regime in bid to save chair
- Second-level .ke domains go on sale this month
- Billionaire Elon Musk reacquired x.com
- Domainers want the head of auDA’s chair
- ICANN expects to lose 750 registrars in the next year
- .blog renewal prices will not go up, registry promises
- ICANN shuffles regional bosses, drops “hub” concept
- .net price increases approved
- India to have SIXTEEN ccTLDs
- ICANN heading to Japan and Canada in 2019
- Uniregistry sale leads to BBC telling millions that domainers exist
- Cybersquatting cases down in .uk
- As .boots self-terminates, ICANN will not redelegate it
- GoDaddy launches security service after Sucuri acquisition
- Zero registrars pass ICANN audit
- Zone file access is crap, security panel confirms
- Ombudsman steps in after harassment claims in Whois group
- US “threatens” Costa Rica over Pirate Bay domains
- Forget emojis, you can buy Egyptian hieroglyph .com domains
- Donuts to pay $213 million for Rightside
- Bladel quits as Council chair as GoDaddy ruled “ineligible” for election
- Should ICANN get breastfeeding areas? Have your say!
- Domain President? Dicker fallout continues as Schwartz unleashes tweetstorm
- InternetNZ wants to fire two of its three (!) CEOs
- CIRA and Nominum offering DNS firewall
- DENIC gets approved for registry escrow
- ICANN scraps remote meeting hubs
- MMX says .vip renewals to be at 70%+
- About that $3,800 emoji domain sale…
- ICANN finds no conflict of interest in .sport decision
- .music and .gay CPE probe could end this month
Yes, .co domains are subject to the UDRP
I’ve been getting a fair bit of search traffic over the last few days from people evidently wondering whether .co domain names are subject to the same UDRP rules as .com, so I thought I’d answer the question directly.
Yes, they are.
For avoidance of doubt, I’ve just talked to .CO Internet’s director of marketing, Lori Anne Wardi, who had just talked to the registry’s policy people.
She told me that .co domains are subject to the exact same ICANN UDRP as .com.
If you’re a .co registrant, you’re bound to the policy the same as you are in .com. If you’re a trademark holder, you file a complaint in the same way.
The only difference at the moment is that .CO Internet has contracted with only one UDRP provider, WIPO, but Wardi said that more providers may be signed up in future.
[…] letter points out, as I have previously, that .co is subject to the UDRP on the same terms as other TLDs including .com. The outcome of a […]