Recent Posts
- Whois vacuum AppDetex raises $10 million
- The DNS’s former overseer now has its own domain name
- Tucows splurges $30 million on Ascio
- UDRP complaints hit new high at WIPO
- .vu to relaunch under mystery new registry
- AlpNames could get PAID for abandoning its customers
- O.com might be a one-off for Verisign
- Andruff escalates Disspain feud, asks ICANN to ban him from chair
- Rumors swirl as AlpNames suffers “days” of downtime
- ICANN plays tough over Amazon dot-brands
- Data beats Merdinger to head universal acceptance group
- Radix sees revenue up 30%
- Verisign gets approval to sell O.com for $7.85
- At eleventh hour, most .uk registrants still don’t own their .uk names
- Mohan takes the reins at Afilias
- Trademark posse fails to block Whois privacy policy
- Nevett headhunts top execs from three rivals
- Internet to lose its .co.ck? Cook Islands mulls name change
- Donuts founder replaces Pitts as MMX’s premium guru
- Phishing still on the decline, despite Whois privacy
- Registrars given six months to deploy Whois killer
- Neustar completes .in migration
- Scottish registry dumps the pound over Brexit fears
- ICANN pushes IANA under Conrad
- .film gTLD sees spike after dropping restrictions
- UN ruling may put .io domains at risk
- Updated: More .amazon delay as governments cancel talks
- Expect more Whois accuracy emails under new ICANN policy
- Namazi named new GDD boss
- Pritz quits Whois privacy group as work enters impossible second phase
- Yanks beat Aussies to accountancy gTLD
- Surprise! Most private Whois look-ups come from Facebook
- Google launches .dev with some big-name anchor tenants
- The internet is about to get a lot gayer
- Claims UDRP has cost over $360 million so far
- Ironic eight-figure deal marks more Euro-registrar consolidation
- Court rules generic dictionary domains CAN be trademarked
- ICANN director Burr leaving Neustar
- Right of the colon? IDN getting killed over dot confusion
- Despite Afilias lawsuit, Neustar names date for Indian takeaway
- Endurance domain revenue dips
- After ICANN knockback, Amazon countries agree to .amazon talks
- Operation September Thrust leads to another million-domain Radix gTLD
- Brexit blamed as .eu hits six-year low
- CentralNic expects flat profit as revenue almost doubles
- XYZ reveals .monster gTLD launch dates
- Huge batch of Afilias TLDs approved in China
- .SE sells off $3.2 million registrar biz
- ICANN picks Seattle for public meeting
- ICANN approves two new TLDs, including THAT one
Yes, .co domains are subject to the UDRP
I’ve been getting a fair bit of search traffic over the last few days from people evidently wondering whether .co domain names are subject to the same UDRP rules as .com, so I thought I’d answer the question directly.
Yes, they are.
For avoidance of doubt, I’ve just talked to .CO Internet’s director of marketing, Lori Anne Wardi, who had just talked to the registry’s policy people.
She told me that .co domains are subject to the exact same ICANN UDRP as .com.
If you’re a .co registrant, you’re bound to the policy the same as you are in .com. If you’re a trademark holder, you file a complaint in the same way.
The only difference at the moment is that .CO Internet has contracted with only one UDRP provider, WIPO, but Wardi said that more providers may be signed up in future.
[…] letter points out, as I have previously, that .co is subject to the UDRP on the same terms as other TLDs including .com. The outcome of a […]