Recent Posts
- Uniregistry: sales prices down for “first time ever”
- Okay, pedants, only 36% of new gTLDs are shrinking
- L’Oreal is using “closed generic” .makeup in an interesting way
- Four in 10 new gTLDs are shrinking
- Domain growth flat in Q2
- Another ccTLD plays down the “com”
- Will ICANN punt on .amazon again?
- MMX sells 7,000 domains for $3.4 million
- .CLUB HQ trashed by Irma, nobody hurt
- XYZ slashes $10 million a year from premium stash
- CentralNic extends XYZ deal until 2032
- Pilot program for Whois killer launches
- Hammock swings from Rightside to MarkMonitor
- Registry bosses to talk ICANN “tax cuts” at private meeting
- Another auDA director quit in secret
- .CLUB nears profitability, talks renewals and “trial” domains
- Deutsch and Doria to join ICANN board
- Afnic appoints Pierre Bonis new CEO
- After slow launch, .africa looks to add hundreds of resellers
- No $17 million rebate for struggling new gTLDs
- MMX: three gTLDs approved for sale in Beijing
- .museum soon could be open to all (no haters please)
- CentralNic promises $30 million .sk will only ever mean “Slovakia”
- Former MarkMonitor execs join new brand protection registrar
- Five million Indian government workers to get IDN email
- ZACR to delete 12,000 .za domains next week
- GoDaddy’s reason for dumping Uniregistry doesn’t make a lot of sense
- GoDaddy CEO to retire at 58
- Google shifts 400,000 .site domains
- Another auDA director quits after conflict claims
- Endurance losing founder-CEO next week
- Google dumps Nazi domain in hours
- GoDaddy kicks out neo-Nazi site after dead protester post
- Tucows revenue rockets after Enom buy
- GoDaddy domains business grows 15% in Q2
- Gay.com, “worth $7 million”, donated to gay blog
- Grumpy campaign claims victory after auDA U-turns
- Iran rep reported to ICANN Ombudsman, again
- .storage to have pricey second sunrise
- HTC dumps its dot-brand
- Halloran made ICANN’s first chief data protection officer
- Verisign confirms first price increase under new .net contract
- EFF recommends against new gTLDs
- auDA chair quits days before vote to fire him
- Crocker: no date on next new gTLD round
- Donuts to complete Rightside acquisition tonight
- MMX says .vip renewals running at 75%
- auDA now looking to outsource .au registry
- .blog tops 100,000 names, 66,500 blogs
- Attendance dips for ICANN in Johannesburg
Yes, .co domains are subject to the UDRP
I’ve been getting a fair bit of search traffic over the last few days from people evidently wondering whether .co domain names are subject to the same UDRP rules as .com, so I thought I’d answer the question directly.
Yes, they are.
For avoidance of doubt, I’ve just talked to .CO Internet’s director of marketing, Lori Anne Wardi, who had just talked to the registry’s policy people.
She told me that .co domains are subject to the exact same ICANN UDRP as .com.
If you’re a .co registrant, you’re bound to the policy the same as you are in .com. If you’re a trademark holder, you file a complaint in the same way.
The only difference at the moment is that .CO Internet has contracted with only one UDRP provider, WIPO, but Wardi said that more providers may be signed up in future.
[…] letter points out, as I have previously, that .co is subject to the UDRP on the same terms as other TLDs including .com. The outcome of a […]