Recent Posts
- Alibaba, Name.com among new RDRS opt-ins
- .my domains to be sold globally next month
- The Swiss can register .swiss domains from next week
- .ai up to 425,000 domains
- A million “free” .music domains up for grabs
- D3 to get $5 million in crypto to apply for .ape gTLD
- Alibaba hit with ICANN breach notice
- New Vegas conference “Davos for Web3 interoperability”
- ICANN content policing power grab may be dead
- Cable company unplugs its dot-brand after acquisition
- Germany crosses 10,000 dot-brand domains milestone
- Founders out as Com Laude gets equity injection
- PIR’s Diaz to leave domain industry
- Some registrars have already quit ICANN’s Whois experiment
- ICANN opens $217 million Grant Program
- Internet could get one-letter gTLDs (but there’s a catch)
- .ai registry fights deadbeats with tweaked auction rules
- Amazon and Google among .internal TLD ban backers
- .ai registry advises buyers not to use GoDaddy
- .post liberalizes with new sunrise period
- Team Internet spends $41 million on content farm
- Epik backtracks on Kiwi Farms claim after legal threat
- .austin names launch on blockchain
- Freenom shuts down 12.6 million domains — report
- GoDaddy’s next .xxx contract may not be a done deal
- GlobalBlock blocking 2.5 million domains
- Microsoft moving its cloud apps from .com to .microsoft
- ICANN 79: anonymous trolls and undercover lawyers
- ICANN scores win in single-letter .com lawsuit
- Cosmetics brand terminates its gTLD
- Up to 70 jobs on the line at Nominet as .uk regs dwindle
- Governments back down on new gTLD next round delay
- Private auctions could be banned in new gTLD next round
- ICANN meeting venue “insensitive and hurtful”
- GoDaddy to start selling graphic.design domains
- GAC spinning up new gTLD curveball at ICANN 79?
- GoDaddy’s GlobalBlock supports blockchain names
- Police .uk domain takedowns dive in 2023
- GoDaddy wants to cut the bullshit from .xxx
- Dueling domain blocking services to launch at ICANN 79
- Freename tries to bridge DNS and blockchain
- Olive retires from ICANN
- Whois policy published without life-saving disclosure rule
- UK gov takes its lead from ICANN on DNS abuse
- Tucows reports 2023 results
- Twitter “completely unresponsive” on clickable domains
- ICANN spends $5 million more than planned in first fiscal half
- .art takes a million domains off its premium list
- KeyTrap ‘the most devastating vulnerability ever found in DNSSEC’
- Freenom settles $500 million Meta lawsuit and will exit domain business
- New gTLD lottery to return in 2026
- First GlobalBlock prices revealed — they ain’t cheap
- Domain universe grows on new gTLDs despite .com shrinkage
- D3 signs up crypto gTLD client number five
- GoDaddy reports strong domains growth
- How to qualify for a $40,000 gTLD
- Registry service provider evaluation handbook published
- WebUnited inks deal to “mirror” country’s TLD in the blockchain
- GoDaddy project unveils brand-blocking calculator
- Report: Monster “misappropriated” millions from Epik
- .com is shrinking but Verisign raises prices again anyway
- D3 announces fourth crypto new gTLD client
- Donald Trump loses second UDRP case
- UK cybersquatting complaints hit record low
- No excuses! PIR to pay for ALL registries to tackle child abuse
- ICANN insists it is working on linkification
- Namecheap sues ICANN over .org price caps
- GoDaddy offers free Ethereum blockchain integration
- Epik reveals who is running the company
- Epik gets acquired again! The plot thickens…
- Airline gTLD crashes and burns
- First chunks of new gTLD Applicant Guidebook drop
- Epik to reveal its owners soon
- Another crypto firm to apply for a new gTLD
- Monster and Royce are NOT involved in Epik?!
- Nominet to overhaul .uk registry, turn off some services
- Russia blames DNSSEC, not Ukraine, for internet downtime
- Team Internet says revenue beat estimates
- Sold for over $20k, insure.ai and dog.ai back in .ai’s expired names auction
- .ai helps UDRP cases rise in 2023, WIPO says
- Freenom’s domains land at Gandi after termination
- .ru domains fly off the shelf as Western sanctions bite
- ICANN picks its first ever Supreme Court
- Lebanon’s ccTLD going back to Lebanon after ICANN takeover
- ICANN picks the domain it will never, ever release
- ICANN approves domain takedown rules
- Has Epik gone “woke”?
- First bits of new gTLD Applicant Guidebook expected next week
- ICANN bans closed generics for the foreseeable
- You can’t use money to buy .box domains
- After 14 years, ICANN practices what it preaches on IDNs
- Weak demand for private Whois data, ICANN data shows
- .ing doing way better than .meme
- DNS Women barred from ICANN funding?
- Dev releases free open-source TLD registry platform
- INCO flips a gTLD to Identity Digital
- Anguilla fears the .ai junk drop
- Five more gTLDs get launch dates
- $10 million of ICANN cash up for grabs
- Almost 50,000 .ai domains sold in a quarter
- ICANN threatens to regulate your speech [RANT]
- Life insurance company kills dot-brand
- ICANN finds new home for Lebanon’s TLD after founder’s death
- ICANN begs people to use its new Whois service
- Shiba Inu outs itself as crypto new gTLD applicant
- Over 50,000 .ai domains sold in three months
- Amazon planning new push into registrar market?
- Registries and registrars vote ‘Yes’ to new DNS abuse rules
- ICANN predicts flattish 2025 for domain industry
- Fast-growing Gname buys another 150 registrars
- GoDaddy service to let you block domains in over 650 TLDs
- Did I find a murder weapon in a zone file?
- ICANN drops the “man” from Ombudsman
- Have your say on police domain takedown powers
- Most registrars are shunning ICANN’s new Whois system
- Nominet to take over .gov.uk
- ICANN picks Istanbul for 2024 meeting
- ICANN’s private Whois data request service goes live
- .au regs slide on 2LD anniversary
- ICANN accused of power grab over $271 million auction fund
- A registrar is getting blamed for an Israeli war propaganda site
- Two more dot-brands bite the dust
- Google sells five-figure AI domain and six-figure .ing hack
- .blackfriday is still a bit rubbish
- Internet Naming Co acquires five more gTLDs
Schilling expects GoDaddy to return after dumping Uniregistry gTLDs
Uniregistry CEO Frank Schilling has expressed his “surprise” that GoDaddy has decided to stop selling his company’s gTLDs, but said he expects the registrar to return in future.
GoDaddy’s decision to stop new registrations and inbound transfers for Uniregistry’s portfolio of gTLDs came after the registry revealed price increases for 16 strings that ranged from nominal to over 3,000%.
The registrar told Domain Name Wire yesterday that Uniregistry’s move presented “an extremely poor customer experience” and “does not reflect well on the domain name industry”.
Registrars are of course the customer-facing end of the domain name industry, and the burden of explaining renewal price increases of 5x falls on their shoulders.
But Schilling seems to expect the ban to be temporary.
“We are extremely surprised by GoDaddy’s reaction but are pleased that our extensions are available at many other registrars who support our approach. We remain ready to support GoDaddy when they decide on a path which works for their customers,” he told DI today.
“We expect them to return,” he added.
It’s a plausible prediction. GoDaddy’s statement to DNW said Uniregistry had been cut off “until we can assess the impact on our current and potential customers”, which suggests it’s not necessarily permanent.
GoDaddy is Uniregistry’s first or second-largest registrar in most of the affected gTLDs.
But because the gTLDs in question have so few domains in them, the number of GoDaddy-sponsored domains is typically under 1,000 per gTLD.
Even in the much larger zones of .click and .link (which are receiving small price increases and will still wholesale for under $10), GoDaddy’s exposure is just a few thousand domains and it’s nowhere near the market leader.
I wonder how much of GoDaddy’s decision to drop Uniregistry has to do with the reaction from domain investors.
Ever since DI broke the news of the price increases a week ago, there’s been a stream of angry domainer blog and forum posts, condemning Schilling and Uniregistry for the decision and using the move as a stick to batter the whole new gTLD program.
For registrars, it doesn’t necessarily strike me a terrible deal.
While they will have to deal with customer fallout, over the longer term higher wholesale prices means bigger margins.
Registrars are already adding about a hundred bucks to the $300 cost of a .game domain, and the price increase from $10 to $300 of the Spanish equivalent, .juegos, likely means similar margins there too.
While GoDaddy might not be the market leader by new gTLDs registration volume (i.e. number of domains), it may very well be that they’re on top when considering overall new gTLDs registration REVENUES, given that they didn’t participate in many of the promos at less than $1 that other registrars did.
At DomainGang, Theo calculated that GoDaddy represented just 2.7% of Punyregistry’s total registrations (for the TLDs with price increases), see:
http://domaingang.com/domain-news/numbers-what-percentage-of-uniregistry-gtlds-are-godaddy-customers/
However, when considering revenue, it could be far more significant.
Thanks, George. I did the best math I could 🙂
Not familiar with GoDaddy’s inner agreements, or their revenue stream up-pricing (as they normally do) for end users that aren’t aware of domainer discounts.
If it’s speculation time, it’s valid to ponder whether GoDaddy has other motives to proceed with such a decision unilaterally, and in particular without informing Uniregistry first.
It’s the uncertainty if they will raise prices again in the future. I expect GD to drop more extensions and other registrars will too.
Did NameCheap bring back support for .XYZ domains? No.
The math shows GoDaddy’s “exposure” to Uniregistry gTLDs is very minimal, even when taking into account the affected (priced up) gTDLs:
http://domaingang.com/domain-news/numbers-what-percentage-of-uniregistry-gtlds-are-godaddy-customers/
For these gTLDs, GoDaddy adds up to 2.76% of Uniregistry domain registrations.
Acro: As I pointed out in a comment submitted earlier (that hasn’t shown up yet), it’s likely that GoDaddy represents a more significant fraction of REVENUES (as opposed to just registration volume), given they weren’t doing all the promos for less than $1 that other registrars were/are doing.
You comment got put in the spam folder by Akismet. I’ve unflagged it. If it happens again let me know via a side channel, as I almost never check the spam folder for false positives.
Expectations are not always correct.
Godaddy is a big dog and Uniregistry a flea.
A 3,000% unexpected rate hike when owner was on roadshow past few years promoting new Gs as usurping .com to Gdaddy customers.
All depends upon who you want to do business with I reckon.
Acro your math is very heavy handed you need to remove ALP names promo, and all North Sound Names. The names that weigh in your calculation are domainer promo reg’s.
Godaddy’s active channel is real small business type users that the gtlds need to innovate towards them.
Taking .link and .click out godaddy holds over 13K registrations, those are quality customers.
Not a dozen customers who owns hundreds, if not thousands of promo names, which will be dropped.
Rev – I did the math that relates GoDaddy to Uniregistry. Cherry-picking gTLDs would skew the math. I could have included the non-hiked gTLDs but since GoDaddy blocks these too, it seems that it’s a policy against Uniregistry, not against price hikes.
I pointed out the relation of gTLD to price hike already (link/click have the lowest.)
I don’t know how you can assess the quality of GoDaddy customers from the gTLD registration numbers – only GoDaddy knows. Numbers are impersonal.
Based on recent developments, some people should stop predicting the future, such as the headline states….
Agreed, I don’t think Godaddy even knows what it will do going forward. The reason they pulled all of Uniregistry strings was because they can’t take the chance, they could raise the price 10,000% next month.
Better they work backwards, and work with the registrants they have, and limit their exposure to blowback, even though others thing end users will pay anything for a bunch of non tangible binary characters.
Seems like there are now far wider implications for new Gs than just Uniregistry. Don’t think Uniregistry is very important to them.
Customer service head needs to come up with approved response to affected customers. Execs are digesting implications and formulating overall new G strategy. Imo.
This is a game of chess. Frank owns 150K .coms and therefore hedged. Many new G string operators are not.
Last I heard he owns over 400,000 .com domains.
I can see GoDaddy going back to all registries and implement price increase cap contracts. Donuts and others may be on the hook here.
Highly likely Godaddy would push for something like that. Will registries sign though? Most ntlds are going to need large price increases to become profitable, they maybe be better of just winging it and saying no.
Agree MM.
What Frank and others should have done was start at $300 and worked his way back down. That way the registrars and the customers don’t get pissed off as hell.
As a clueless end-user if I had a domain at GoDaddy and then the price went up $300 from $10 I would never do business with GoDaddy again, even though it’s not their fault. I would not care what the explanation was why the price went up because they are the one that sold me the domain.
It’s so patently unfair to end-users and ICANN, being the scumbags they are, never put price any of these extensions, or even legacy extensions that matter.
Shame on ICANN
Shame on Frank
Shame on Uniregistry
Everyone knew well in advance that these things would never sell and now look where we are, in a sh*t hole.
I put 90% of the blame on ICANN for allowing this kind of system to exist. Could ICANN be any worse than organization?
As reported last week by many different people, this is one of the death blows to nTLDs. It won’t be a swift kill by any means. It will likely take a decade and slowly TLDs will pop and fizzle out. The writing is on the wall and such a move by Uni shows how foolish one would be to build a business on a fundamentally questionable business model.
Who said so, Nostradamus? 🙂
ICANN let the cat out of the bag 3 years ago, and it’s never going back in. Fact.
I understand the time is ripe for some to spit out venom, but there is no “I told you so” moment here.
A single registry’s decision on a handful of unpopular gTLDs does not dictate the value or potential of the gTLD program; in fact, this is the best thing that can happen, a raw awakening, that money for Registries isn’t in domain investors.
It’s not with end users or developers either. 🙂
ICANN let .mobi, .biz, .aero, .travel, .info out of the bag over a decade ago and they’re not going back. Fact.
Too fuc*in’ funny, Acro. None of those extensions mean a damn thing today and none of the new TLD’s will mean a damn thing tomorrow.
I never liked you Acro, but I do know you’re smart, and would expect more from your brain than that.
“I never liked you Acro” – Oh, my “fan” base showed up. 🙂
I hear Drew Rosener is starting up a domain blog troll list, make sure you sign up.
Educate yourself, or at least, if you stick to what you know, don’t disparage others that know better.
The “money grab” model has doomed the new gTLDs barring any real change. .Com is still laughing…
Hello Kevin,
Why have you broadcast that Go-Daddy will return for more bad business with Uniregistry? Has there been an announcement by Go-Daddy? or is this wishful thinking? JAS 3/14/17
Gratefully, Jeff Schneider (Contact Group) (Metal Tiger) (Former Rockefeller IBEC Marketing Analyst/Strategist) (Licensed CBOE Commodity Hedge Strategist) (Domain Master http://www.UseBiz.com)
If GoDaddy is smart and they are IMO, then they should not reverse their decision.
Anyone stating new GTLDs are “doomed” is delusional, protecting their 1000+ .com legacy business or a paid commentator. Anonymous blog trolls lie. Numbers do not. There are 25 mil names registered today. in 10 years there will be 100 million. These same sorts of doomsday remarks got posted up when there were 1 mil names in new gold
Anyone stating new GTLDs are “doomed” is delusional, protecting their 1000+ .com legacy business or a paid commentator. Anonymous blog trolls lie. Numbers do not. There are 25 mil names registered today. in 10 years there will be 100 million. These same sorts of doomsday remarks got posted up when there were 1 mil names in new gold
I don’t think GoDaddy’s move has anything to do with domainer gripes. Domainers are easy to explain the price increase to: Hey, blame Frank. It’s the end users that registered domains at GoDaddy and built websites on them that will be hard to explain this to.
Hello Andrew,
Youre comment = ” It’s the end users that registered domains at GoDaddy and built websites on them that will be hard to explain this to.”
Go-Daddys injection of new TLDs into The S.E.M. Platform will eventually cause disaster for Go-daddy. To count on the S.E.M. Platform for strategically gaining any upper hand is totally counter-intuitive. Jas 3/15/17
Gratefully, Jeff Schneider (Contact Group) (Metal Tiger) (Former Rockefeller IBEC Marketing Analyst/Strategist) (Licensed CBOE Commodity Hedge Strategist) (Domain Master http://www.UseBiz.com)
It’s also possible GD may apply this decision to HEG brands too if/when they complete.
So this could have bigger impacts on Uniregistry in europe in the future if they do stick to it.