Recent Posts
- Breaking: Judge rules ICANN handover will happen!
- ICANN handover in jeopardy as Texas leads lawsuit against US government
- Squabbling drug peddlers drag .pharmacy into brand bunfight
- For $10,000, Donuts will block hundreds of typos and premiums for your brand
- Over 50,000 names sold as .shop has successful launch day
- GoDaddy spearheads Domain Connect spec
- “UDRP-proof” .feedback gTLD loses first UDRP
- CIRA becomes first new gTLD back-end since 2012
- People are forgetting .com exists — ICANN survey
- Famous Four VP goes solo, claims $400,000 sale
- Watch: Hollywood actors trash Trump, promote .vote
- Could ICANN reject Verisign’s $135m .web bid?
- Chinese investor pumps $7 million into M+M as .vip pushes firm into profit
- Barcelona picked for ICANN 63
- Destroy ICANN! Destroy ICANN with missiles!
- Uniregistry to release 10 million domains on October 4
- .blog gets 600 applications halfway through sunrise
- Verisign data shows new gTLDs drive almost three quarters of Q2 growth
- Customers revolt as GoDaddy buys WordPress tools outfit
- First dot-brand gTLD to go generic after TLS deal
- Correction: what NTIA said about .com pricing
- Relaunch and slashed prices for .whoswho after terrible sales
- US claims option to delay IANA transition as Cruz launches free speech doomsday clock
- .trust gTLD might be for sale as NCC closes domain business
- Tata ponders “buy a school” strategy to release .tata from limbo
- .hotel losers gang up to threaten ICANN with legal bills
- Are .mail, .home and .corp safe to launch? Applicants think so
- Dot Registry backs .africa loser, batters on the ICANN lawsuit floodgates
- West.cn targets Engrish domainers with new .xyz site
- Spurned applicant crowd-funding to fight ICANN for .gay gTLD
- Confused by new gTLDs? Allow this Nominet infographic to make your brain explode
- Registries rebel against ICANN’s Whois upgrade decree
- NamesCon confirms three more shows after being acquired
- Afilias set to get .hotel despite hacking claims
- “Dave” becomes first .blog blogger
- Registrar CEO faces terrorism charges
- Industry lays into Verisign over .com deal renewal
- ICANN lawyers slam “fire him” story “blogger”
- Next new gTLD round could start sooner than expected
- Centuries-old companies both fail community gTLD test
- Afilias buys three gTLDs from Starting Dot
- Donuts rolls the dice with $22.5 million .web lawsuit
- IRP panel crucifies ICANN for lack of transparency
- L’Oreal shows cards on former “closed generic” gTLDs
- Verisign confirms it did fund $135 million .web bid
- Ombudsman trashes ICANN’s rejection of .gay “community”
- Verisign likely $135 million winner of .web gTLD
- Verisign announces .net price increase
- .web could already be a record-breaker as auction enters day two
- M+M billings quadruple on China .vip surge
Short .tel domains available tomorrow
Telnic has announced that two-letter and numeric-only .tel domain names will becomes available from tomorrow at 2pm UTC.
You’ll be able to register any two-letter .tel domain that has not already been claimed in a two-week landrush period, which ends today, with the exception of combinations that match ccTLDs.
Numeric-only and numeric/hyphen domains are restricted to seven characters and under, in order to avoid clashes with telephone numbers.
The release of numeric .tel domains was the subject of a minor controversy when Telnic first made the request to ICANN last year.
Telnic said pricing is expected to be the same as regular .tel registrations – usually about the same price as a .com domain name.
A list of participating registrars can be found here.
This is the final card in the .tel controversy that TelNIC is able to play. Unless they renegotiate their agreement with ICANN in order to open up this bastardized TLD’s DNS to include proper records, the number of total .tel registrations should become half, each year.
@Acro
It seems a bit harsh to use the term “bastardized” just because you don’t share their vision of a seamless communications system.
I do agree they’re slow to develop something that seems on the outside a simplistic system, and I’ve waited long enough for simple features that I could have done on any other gTLD.
But we’re all ready seeing a huge 22k drop just as 2 letter / 2 number domains come into play, I’m guessing that was greedy investors dumping in order to try to capitalize on them, not from lack of interest in it’s direction, as now almost all including hyphenated 2 letter or 1 letter 1 number domains are taken.
Which FYI allowed me to pick up a three letter .tel domain I had my eye on for 2 years, and that I would not have been able to get without approaching some extortionate sales site.
So before you spout a know it all attitude for the back link, perhaps you could let us know if you’ve even bought one and tried to develop it into something of value? or did you fail to even login to the control panel?
If you actually spend some time, you’ll maybe realize you can do allot with a .tel setup + api up-to and including directory’s for sharing almost real time content, in return for ad clicks or donations.
But I’m not deluded or blinded about whats going on with .tel, but I’d would not have used the term “bastardized” based on how they want to use DNS technology to look to the future.
PROTIP, don’t count things out without knowing what’s really going on, hint hint *payment system* hint hint *Global avatars*.
[…] Short .tel name available tomorrow […]