Recent Posts
- The internet just got its first proper new gTLD of the year, and the timing couldn’t be worse
- ICANN may not meet again for a looong time
- ICANN denies Whois policy “failure” as Marby issues EU warning
- These eight companies account for more than half of ICANN’s revenue
- Lockdown bump was worth $600,000 to ICANN, but end of Club Med saves 10x as much
- That .sucks weirdness? Worse than I thought
- Something weird’s going on at .sucks
- Are 25x price increases on the cards as XYZ corners the cars market?
- .gay and Star Trek star troll the right to promote new gTLD
- Forty weddings and a funeral? .wed is dead but may come up for auction
- Holy Scheisse! Did you know ICANN 69 starts TOMORROW?
- MMX probing accounting of mystery contract
- NamesCon will be back to in-person events next July
- .eu registry contract up for grabs
- EURid suspends and delays thousands of coronavirus domains
- .jobs plans to raise millions from premium names after dumping its sponsor
- Peaceful transfer of power? GNSO’s next chair is a shoo-in
- Two American women appointed to ICANN board
- Europe’s top dogs could decide the future of Whois
- ICANN playing ping-pong on closed generics controversy
- Has ICANN cut off its regulatory hands?
- Will you shut up, man? Trump takedown domain on sale for ridiculous fee
- MMX revenue down even as sales rise during pandemic
- This ICANN comment period is a Kafkaesque nightmare
- Could .cpa be the most successful new gTLD sunrise yet?
- ICANN 69 returning to YouTube
- Three-letter .blog domains priced up to $100k
- Whois plan approved, but it may be a waste of money
- Should YOU have to pay when lawyers access your private Whois info?
- Nominet shuts down “hostile” discussion forum
- Donuts to launch .contact next week
- GoDaddy denies weird front-running claim
- Is India’s largest registrar about to go titsup? And where the hell is ICANN?
- Webcentral rejects Web.com buyout bid for LOWER offer from Aussie telco
- Portugal reports lockdown boom continued through the summer
- No ICANN meetings until 2021
- ZADNA hikes up the price of .za domains
- Floodgates, open! Trademark Clearinghouse now supports .com
- Radix premium renewals approach $1 million
- GoDaddy could lose control of .co this week
- ICANN ordered to freeze .hotel after “serious questions” about trade secrets “theft”
- CentralNic parking boosts revenue even as its registrars suffer
- ICANN will spend $51,000 on your broadband
- Verisign measures the industry’s lockdown bump
- ICANN apologizes to “arms dealer” claim security firm after email goes missing
- Amazon waves off demand for more government blocks
- Told us so? Nominet ditches auctions plan, will charge drop-catchers higher fees instead
- Schreiber really did sue you all, sorry
- Fight over closed generics ends in stalemate
- New gTLD prices could be kept artificially high
- Here’s what’s in the NamesCon Online schwag bag
- New back-end approval program could reduce the cost of a new gTLD
- Single/plural gTLD combos to be BANNED
- ICANN might pay for your lockdown broadband
- The end of the beginning? ICANN releases policies for next round of new gTLDs
- It’s a CONSPIRACY! Canadian registrant “sues” pretty much everybody
- “Arms dealer” registrar probed by ICANN
- No lockdown bump for .eu as domain base shrinks in Q2
- After a year’s delay, .gay reveals launch dates
- ICANN names Egypt-based head of Istanbul office
- Countries ask Amazon for thousands more domain blocks
- Dot-brand fizzles out after acquisition
- The two biggest registrars knock it out of the park in Q2
- Domain industry had best April ever under lockdown
- .bible-thumping anti-porn registrar goes titsup
- The pricey, complex, clusterfuck plan to reopen Whois
- Tucows sells off Ting business, retreats into the back-end
- No .sex please, we’re infected!
- Domainers immune from the lockdown bump?
- Drop auctions not a slam-dunk, says Nominet
- After Chapter 11 filing, JCPenney dumps its dot-brand
- Israeli registrar denies “arms dealer” claims
- Nominet members revolt over “deepest pockets wins” auction plans
- CSC becomes first foreign registrar to get the China nod
- ICANN close to becoming $200 million gift-giver
- The $135 million battle for .web could be won in weeks
- .com renewals lowest in years, but Verisign sees lockdown bump anyway
- ICANN washes its hands of Amazon controversy
- Google’s .new now generally available
- $11 billion dot-brand blames coronavirus as it self-euthanizes
- ICANN still has no clue how coronavirus will affect the domain industry
- ICANN throws out “Ugly Houses” UDRP appeal
- Brazil to launch domains for detectives, librarians and geologists
- Endurance also got a lockdown bump in Q2
- Nominet wants to kill off the .uk drop-catching market
- Right to reply: new gTLD applicant hits back at my “delusional” comments
- One.com takes big chunk of Danish market with third acquisition this year
- Web.com acquires another of the original five registrars
- Mucho weirdness as Google “forgets” to renew major domain
- First deadbeat dot-brand ripped from the root
- Coronavirus helps .nl beat 6 million regs
- NamesCon Online ticket prices and name change revealed
- GoDaddy domains doing just fine during pandemic, lays off hundreds anyway
- I was wrong, rejected “racist” web site didn’t go to Epik
- World’s most deluded new gTLD applicant makes coronavirus pitch
- Does ICANN have a race problem?
- As the world burns, ICANN gives its richest execs huge pay rises
- Web.com is kicking out a racist web site. How long before it winds up at Epik?
- Over 660,000 “coronavirus” domains registered
- Watch three members of the ICANN community get assassinated
- “Horrifying” Zoombombing attack on ICANN meeting, again
- Coronavirus is saving ICANN millions of your money, but will it use the cash wisely?
- Half as many women apply for ICANN leadership jobs
- ICANN decision to cancel Hamburg was NOT unanimous
- NamesCon goes virtual with intriguing 24-hour conference concept
- Virtual cocktails coming to ICANN meetings. Really.
- More dot-brands dump their gTLDs
- GoDaddy, PorkBun and Endurance win domain “blocking” court fight
- You won’t need a password for ICANN 68 after all
- Donuts rolls out free phishing attack protection for all registrants
- .black gTLD has seen boost since George Floyd killing
- ICANN confirms Hamburg cancellation
- Bored? Try the DI Fiendishly Difficult Domain Name Pub Quiz
- Three big registries will take down opioid domains for US govt
- Should Epik be banned from NamesCon as racism debate spills over into domain industry?
- ICANN board tries to redefine mediocrity — literally
- GoDaddy starts protecting American customers’ privacy
- Will ICANN swap Hamburg for Zoom for 69?
- Top-level reshuffle as ICANN loses its COO
- Amazon finally gets its dot-brands despite last-minute government plea
- South Africa might raise, or lower, some wholesale domain fees
- Verisign says its coronavirus fee waivers have saved businesses millions
- Industry growth driven by new gTLD(s) in Q1
- World’s youngest country launches its Nazi-risk TLD next week
- Is ICANN chickening out of Whois access role?
Thick .com Whois policy delayed
Kevin Murphy,
February 16, 2012, 16:06:10 (UTC),
Domain Registries
ICANN’s GNSO Council has deferred a decision on whether Verisign should have to thicken up the Whois database for .com and its other gTLDs.
A motion to begin an official Policy Development Process on thick Whois was kicked down the road by councilors this afternoon at the request of the Non-Commercial Users Constituency.
It will now be discussed at the Council’s face-to-face meeting in Costa Rica in March. But there were also calls from registries to delay a decision for up to a year, calling the PDP a “distraction”.
Verisign’s .com registry contract and the standard Registrar Accreditation Agreement are currently being renegotiated by ICANN, both of which could address Whois in some way.
Today, all contracted gTLD registries have to operate a thick Whois, except Verisign with its .com, .net, .jobs, etc, where the registrars manage the bulk of the Whois data.
Just to make it clear as I did on the council call, Verisign itself supports the idea of the PDP if the GNSO community wants it. The rest of the registries, however, believe that we should not have PDPs that focus on the activities of only 1 or very few entities (in this case registries) especially when there are so many other pressing items on the GNSO community’s agenda.
Thanks Jeff.
I did report on Verisign’s position in earlier coverage linked to in the above post.
http://domainincite.com/fight-brewing-over-thick-com-whois/