Recent Posts
- .CLUB revenue reportedly $7.2 million
- How a single Whois complaint got this registrar shitcanned
- 38th dot-brand bows out after acquisition
- ICANN CTO: no reason to delay KSK rollover
- DomainTools tracks its one billionth domain
- ICANN closes GoDaddy Whois probe
- Allstate dumps a dot-brand
- I was wrong, Famous Four bosses WERE kicked out
- No Verfügungsanspruch for ICANN in GDPR lawsuit
- Famous Four is DEAD! New registry promises spam crackdown
- auDA car crash continues as director quits over foreign members
- New ICANN director named
- My brain explodes trying to understand MMX’s new blockchain deal for .luxe
- Fight over Whois access starts early
- Blacknight calls for Ireland to slash domain prices
- Chaotic scenes as ‘Grumpies’ lose auDA board fight
- These 33 people will decide the future of Whois
- Wix.com obtains ICANN accreditation — bad news for Web.com?
- Two companies “capture” auDA
- Facebook clashes with registrars after massive private data request
- Baidu gets Chinese approval for .baidu
- ICANN rejected Israel as meeting venue due to threat from Gaza and Iran
- ICANN’s GDPR lawsuit bounced up to appeals court
- Neustar swaps out CEO, PIR looking for new CEO
- Is the new Whois policy group already doomed to fail?
- auDA chair defends $9 million windfall as no-confidence vote looms
- Swiss registry gets more traffic than Google, kinda
- Pritz to be named chair of Whois group
- Donuts confirms six-figure .news buyer used a fake name
- KeyDrive reverses into CentralNic in $55 million deal
- .pharmacy TLD faces action after losing complaint over Canadian drug peddler
- Donuts makes six-figure .news sale to dangerous conspiracy theorist
- MMX gets four more gTLDs approved for China use
- Four more dot-brands call it quits
- Plural gTLDs to be banned over confusion concerns
- Digital archery ruled out for next new gTLD round
- Could crypto solve the Whois crisis?
- Euro-Whois advice still as clear as mud
- New gTLD fees could be kept artificially high
- First-come, first-served for new gTLDs? Have your say
- Fight breaks out as Afilias eats Neustar’s Aussie baby
- .kids gTLD auction probably back on
- Archaeologists protest “televangelist” .bible gTLD
- .co first ccTLD to get China approval
- All Cyrillic .eu domains to be deleted
- ICANN heads to Cancun for Spring Break boondoggle
- GoDaddy signs up for basically unrestricted .travel gTLD
- Biggest TLD handover in history happens this weekend
- Web.com to be acquired for $2 billion
- Has the world’s biggest new gTLD registry gone bankrupt?
Thick .com Whois policy delayed
ICANN’s GNSO Council has deferred a decision on whether Verisign should have to thicken up the Whois database for .com and its other gTLDs.
A motion to begin an official Policy Development Process on thick Whois was kicked down the road by councilors this afternoon at the request of the Non-Commercial Users Constituency.
It will now be discussed at the Council’s face-to-face meeting in Costa Rica in March. But there were also calls from registries to delay a decision for up to a year, calling the PDP a “distraction”.
Verisign’s .com registry contract and the standard Registrar Accreditation Agreement are currently being renegotiated by ICANN, both of which could address Whois in some way.
Today, all contracted gTLD registries have to operate a thick Whois, except Verisign with its .com, .net, .jobs, etc, where the registrars manage the bulk of the Whois data.
Just to make it clear as I did on the council call, Verisign itself supports the idea of the PDP if the GNSO community wants it. The rest of the registries, however, believe that we should not have PDPs that focus on the activities of only 1 or very few entities (in this case registries) especially when there are so many other pressing items on the GNSO community’s agenda.
Thanks Jeff.
I did report on Verisign’s position in earlier coverage linked to in the above post.
http://domainincite.com/fight-brewing-over-thick-com-whois/