Recent Posts
- Oh, the irony! Banned anti-Islam activist shows up on “Turkish” new gTLD domain
- ICANN got hacked by crypto bots
- Revenue dips as Brexit whacks .eu in 2018
- auDA rejects domaining ban but approves second-level domains
- KPMG dumps .com for dot-brand gTLD
- David and Goliath? DotMusic confirms .music win
- Neustar loses most of its Amazon back-end biz to Nominet
- ICANN takes the reins again as .amazon talks fail
- Italian bank is the latest dot-brand to bow out
- .music update: I’m calling it for Costa
- ICA opposes Aussie domaining ban
- “Just give up!” ICANN tells its most stubborn new gTLD applicant
- Did Roussos pull off the impossible? Google, Donuts, Radix all drop out of .music race
- “Stringent” new online censorship law could affect domain companies
- Looks like .music is finally on its way
- .blog tops 200,000 regs due to WordPress partnership
- .london disaster leads to mixed 2018 for MMX
- ICANN waves goodbye to Adobe Connect over security, pricing
- Donuts raises prices on most TLDs by up to 9%
- .com outsells new gTLDs by 2:1 in 2018
- CentralNic gets 680,000 AlpNames domains for free, kinda
- NameSilo nets $1.5 million profit
- Registry offers “$2,500” in sweeteners for .inc registrants
- Most .uk registrants not interested in .uk
- Australia likely to BAN domaining
- Root servers whacked after crypto change
- XYZ weighs into Epik controversy with .monster fundraising domain
- After NZ shooting, Epik has a Monster PR problem
- Another dot-brand bites the dust
- Whois vacuum AppDetex raises $10 million
- The DNS’s former overseer now has its own domain name
- Tucows splurges $30 million on Ascio
- UDRP complaints hit new high at WIPO
- .vu to relaunch under mystery new registry
- AlpNames could get PAID for abandoning its customers
- O.com might be a one-off for Verisign
- Andruff escalates Disspain feud, asks ICANN to ban him from chair
- Rumors swirl as AlpNames suffers “days” of downtime
- ICANN plays tough over Amazon dot-brands
- Data beats Merdinger to head universal acceptance group
- Radix sees revenue up 30%
- Verisign gets approval to sell O.com for $7.85
- At eleventh hour, most .uk registrants still don’t own their .uk names
- Mohan takes the reins at Afilias
- Trademark posse fails to block Whois privacy policy
- Nevett headhunts top execs from three rivals
- Internet to lose its .co.ck? Cook Islands mulls name change
- Donuts founder replaces Pitts as MMX’s premium guru
- Phishing still on the decline, despite Whois privacy
- Registrars given six months to deploy Whois killer
Thick .com Whois policy delayed
ICANN’s GNSO Council has deferred a decision on whether Verisign should have to thicken up the Whois database for .com and its other gTLDs.
A motion to begin an official Policy Development Process on thick Whois was kicked down the road by councilors this afternoon at the request of the Non-Commercial Users Constituency.
It will now be discussed at the Council’s face-to-face meeting in Costa Rica in March. But there were also calls from registries to delay a decision for up to a year, calling the PDP a “distraction”.
Verisign’s .com registry contract and the standard Registrar Accreditation Agreement are currently being renegotiated by ICANN, both of which could address Whois in some way.
Today, all contracted gTLD registries have to operate a thick Whois, except Verisign with its .com, .net, .jobs, etc, where the registrars manage the bulk of the Whois data.
Just to make it clear as I did on the council call, Verisign itself supports the idea of the PDP if the GNSO community wants it. The rest of the registries, however, believe that we should not have PDPs that focus on the activities of only 1 or very few entities (in this case registries) especially when there are so many other pressing items on the GNSO community’s agenda.
Thanks Jeff.
I did report on Verisign’s position in earlier coverage linked to in the above post.
http://domainincite.com/fight-brewing-over-thick-com-whois/