New gTLD application fee rises by thousands after collision call

ICANN has upped its expected new gTLD application fee after approving a costly new plan to tack name collisions.

The baseline price of applying for a single string, most recently pegged at $220,000, is now expected to go up by $5,000, according to a recent resolution of the ICANN board of directors.

The board earlier this month approved the Name Collision Analysis Project Study 2 Final Report, which proposed a way to prevent new gTLDs seriously interfering with existing non-standard TLD use on private networks.

Strings applied for successfully in the 2012 round had to agree to a 90-day post-launch period of “controlled interruption”, during which the entire gTLD was wildcarded with information to help affected parties fix their DNS configuration.

So if a company had been using .horse on its internal network, and a suddenly-delegated .horse gTLD started causing leakages to the public DNS, the company was quickly alerted to what the problem was.

Under the now-approved NCAP 2 plan, ICANN will take over responsibility for controlled interruption. Applied-for strings will be tested in the live DNS before a registry has even been contracted.

The results would be assessed by a Technical Review Team and applicants for strings considered at high risk of collisions would be able to submit mitigation plans for evaluation before having their registry contracts approved.

While approving NCAP 2 will generate more confidence that the Next Round will in fact go ahead in the second quarter of 2026, this extra stage of course will add friction and cost to the evaluation process.

ICANN estimates it will add $500,000 to its program implementation budget and $6.9 million to the application processing budget, increasing the application fee by $5,000 per application. That seems to assume 1,500 applications being submitted.

The likely increase has been flagged up for months, so is unlikely to surprise potential applicants, but will not appease those already grumbling that the fee has gone up so sharply from the $185,000 charged in the 2012 round.

It’s also bad news for companies that applied for .home, .corp or .mail in 2012, which were rejected due to the high risk of collisions.

The ICANN board rejected NCAP 2’s recommendation that these three gTLDs should be submitted to the new Name Collision Risk Assessment Process, potentially reawakening their applications from their Not Approved status.

Under the latest board action, anyone who applied for .home, .corp or .mail in 2012 will have no preferential treatment if they apply for the same strings again in 2026, according to the resolution.

Affected applicants were already offered a full refund for their rejected bids, with only deep-pocketed Amazon and Google so far not exercising that option. Now they have no excuse.

1 Comment Tagged: collisions, ICANN, ncap, new gTLDs, next round

Former .co registry defeated in $350 million contract fix case

The Neustar spin-off that once operated the .co TLD reportedly has lost a case against the Colombian government in which it had sought $350 million in damages over the acrimonious renewal of its registry contract.

According to local reports, the International Center for the Settlement of Investment Disputes, part of the World Bank, last week ruled in favor of Colombia on both the merits and on jurisdictional grounds.

The case had been brought in late 2019 by Neustar, which at the time managed some 2.3 million .co domains, under government contract, via a Colombian subsidiary it acquired in 2014.

Neustar has since been acquired by GoDaddy, which continues to run .co, but the ICSID case was inherited by Vercara, the DNS security services arm of the company that GoDaddy didn’t buy.

As .CO Internet, Vercara was hired by Colombia to turn .co into a global alternative to .com with a much-hyped 2010 relaunch. It was very successful, but when it came time to renew the initial 10-year contract, Colombia instead put it out for rebid and started behaving very strangely.

You may recall from coverage here on DI and on The Register that the Colombian tender process seemed to have been specially constructed so that only Afilias, then Neustar’s fiercest rival and now part of Identity Digital, could win.

The government’s RFP had set technical thresholds, such as daily registry transactions, that Afilias could show it met but Neustar could not. It looked naive and arbitrary at best and dodgy at worst.

So Neustar took Colombia to arbitration with ICSID, saying (pdf) the government was in breach of the Trade Promotion Agreement between the US and Colombia.

Neustar ended up winning the contract anyway, albeit on terms that were massively more favorable to the government, and it sold its entire registry services business to GoDaddy days later.

Now, almost five years later, it seems Vercara has lost the case it inherited. While ICSID has not yet published its arbitration panel’s decision, local newspapers have got hold of a copy.

Colombia’s oldest newspaper, El Spectador, reports: “The court, in addition to stating that it does not have jurisdiction to hear Vercara’s claims, rejected all the claims on the merits.”

In unrelated news, Vercara’s recently announced acquisition by DigiCert closed yesterday.

Comment Tagged: .co, .co internet, afilias, colombia, godaddy, identity digital, neustar, vercara

Is this the first Next Round new gTLD contention battle?

It had to happen sooner or later. With a few dozen would-be new gTLD applicants breaking cover over the last year or so, we seem to have our first clash and our first potential 2026-round contention set.

The sought-after contested gTLD is .chain, which now has two announced hopefuls after blockchain-based alternative naming system Freename.io yesterday revealed it wants the string.

“The company intends to apply for .chain, .token, .metaverse and a variety of other gTLDs,” Freename said. “Freename will also submit applications on behalf of third-party customers in this new gTLDs round.”

Freename, if it follows through, is likely to face competition from at least one other applicant, a company called 3DNS, which in June announced plans to apply for .chain and .super.

3DNS has Intercap as its registry partner, while Freename is partnered with registry ShortDot on a joint venture called WebUnited.

Freename already sells blockchain-based names that use .chain as an extension, while 3DNS sells third-level DNS domains under .chain.box that it hopes to upgrade to second-level names should it win the ICANN contest.

In truth, I’d be incredibly surprised if these are the only two companies to apply for .chain, which is a shortened version of “blockchain” and likely to be an attractive string with the whole crypto/”Web3″ crowd.

Under ICANN’s under-development rules, the exact process for resolving contention sets is still up in the air, with more clarity hoped for over the next few months.

ICANN has confirmed that it intends to ban private auctions in the next round, but has also come up with a new second-choice alternate string option that is already causing grumbling in the policy-making community.

1 Comment Tagged: .chain, 3dns, blockchain, crypto, freename, intercap, shortdot

ICANN names its Supreme Court judges

ICANN has finally named the members of the quasi-judicial body that will oversee its highest accountability mechanism.

The names of the 12 members of the Independent Review Process Standing Panel were published by ICANN this afternoon and the International Centre for Dispute Resolution, which manages the IRP, published their resumes.

They’re mainly lawyers and law professors with extensive arbitration experience. There’s one African, and the rest are either North American or European; none are from Asia or Latin America.

The Standing Panel has been a long time coming. It’s been over a decade since ICANN first said it would create one. The jurists were picked by a community committee in January, but ICANN wanted to get them all contracted and up to speed before naming them.

The idea is to streamline IRP, which currently is barely distinguishable from the judicial system when it comes to duration of cases, by allowing ICANN and complainants to select their panel from a known pool of trained, experienced, vetted experts.

The IRP is the final formal appeals mechanism within the ICANN process before lawsuits start flying. There’s been over 20 filed in the last 16 years, and ICANN’s win-to-loss ratio is not great.

Comment Tagged: ICANN, irp, standing panel

Who uses Sunrise nowadays? You might be surprised

Sunrise periods may have been one of the unexpectedly damp squibs of the new gTLD program, but each launching registry is still obliged to run them and they usually attract a hundred or so registrations, some quite surprising.

Amazon’s sunrise periods for .deal and .now closed yesterday, ending with about 160 domains in each, so I thought I’d have a trawl through each zone file to see who’s mad-keen on protecting their trademarks online nowadays.

Excluding registered variants (with and without hyphens, for example), brands under the control of a single parent company, and domains registered to Amazon itself, I’d say there were fewer than 100 actual registrants in each sunrise.

With that in mind, you might expect only the most valuable, most at-risk brands to have participated.

Big tech firms — Meta, Microsoft, Google, Yahoo, Ebay, AOL, Baidu, etc — which are particularly at risk of phishing attacks, have indeed all snapped up names matching some of their famous marks.

Brands that might have a higher risk of counterfeiting, such as fashion and beauty brands like Maison Margiela, L’Occitane, Patagonia, Richard Mille, and Rolex all make an appearance in the zones.

But there are plenty of sunrise registrants whose appearance got me scratching my head.

Perhaps the weirdest registrant is SuperSigns, a sign-maker that appears to operate out of a single location, the size of a typical convenience store, between a Toyota dealership and a Dunkin’ Donuts on a small strip mall in Arizona.

La Famiglia Rana is a brand of ready-made supermarket pasta products that has registered at least three domains in each gTLD during sunrise.

Mars didn’t register mars.now or mars.deal, but its subsidiary did register championpetfoods.now.

CooperVision makes contact lenses and it registered both of its exact matches.

Delsey makes luggage. Danfoss makes electrical components. Nedgia distributes natural gas in Spain. Lechuza makes self-watering plant pots. Invisalign makes dental braces. They all participated in sunrise.

And we all know how mad the Americans are for the sport of polo, which is perhaps why The United States Polo Association chose to snap up uspoloassn.deal before somebody else did.

It’s certainly an eclectic mix, with no readily apparent common theme, but each registrant presumably has its own good reason for buying sunrise matches, even if that reason was simply telling its registrar: “Register everything!”

.now and .deal enter their Early Access Period of general availability today and go to standard pricing at the end of the month.

Comment Tagged: .deal, .now, amazon, sunrise

ICANN gunning for Tencent over abuse claims

ICANN Compliance is taking on one of the world’s largest technology companies over claims that a registrar it owns turns a blind eye to DNS abuse and phishing.

The Org has published a breach of contract notice against a Singapore registrar called Aceville Pte Ltd, which does business as DNSPod and is owned by and shares its headquarters with $86-billion-a-year Chinese tech conglomerate Tencent.

ICANN says that DNSPod essentially has turned a blind eye to recent abuse reports, allowing phishing sites to stay online long after they were reported, and makes life difficult for people trying to report abuse.

It also has failed to upgrade from the Whois protocol to RDAP and failed to migrate its registration data escrow service provider from NCC to DENIC, according to the notice.

According to ICANN, DNSPod received abuse reports about several domains in July and August but failed to take action at all or until ICANN itself got in touch to investigate. Compliance wants to know why.

ICANN adds that the registrar seems to be requiring reporters to create user accounts and use a web form to submit their reports, even after they’ve already used the abuse@ email address.

Stricter rules on DNS abuse came into force on registrars this April. They’re now required to take action on abuse reports.

“Aceville does not appear to have a process in place to promptly, comprehensively, and reasonably investigate and act on reports of DNS Abuse,” the notice reads.

ICANN has given DNSPod until October 11 to answer its questions or risk escalation.

While DNSPod says it has been around for 17 years, it only received its ICANN accreditation in 2020. Since then, it’s grown to almost 200,000 domains under management in gTLDs.

It’s primarily a DNS resolution service provider, saying it hosts over 20 million domains, and does not appear to operate as a retail registrar in the usual sense.

Owner Tencent may not be a household name in the Anglophone world, but it’s the company behind some of China’s leading social media brands, including QQ and WeChat, as well as a formidable force in gaming and one of the world’s richest companies in any sector.

It’s the second huge Chinese tech firm to find itself publicly shamed by ICANN in recent months. Compliance went after Tencent’s primary competitor, Alibaba, on similar grounds in March. Alibaba has since resolved the complaints.

Comment Tagged: abuse, aceville, alibaba, breach, compliance, dns abuse, dnspod, ICANN, tencent

All the one-character .sk domains to be auctioned

SK-NIC, part of Team Internet, says it plans to auction off all 36 single-character .sk domains over the coming months.

The auction plans also include releasing all the 200-odd two-letter domains that match existing ccTLDs, as well as .com.sk and .net.sk, which have all been registry-reserved to date.

The registry said it plans to hold auctions every two months starting on the 15th and running for seven days, starting in November.

There will be a trademark priority phase first, running from October 1 to October 14, in which trademark owners can apply for their matching domain for €300. If successful, the domain will cost them €3,000 ($3,348) or more if a contested mark has to be auctioned.

Opening bids for the regular auctions will start at €1,000 for two-char names, €1,500 for the 26 one-letter domains, and €2,000 for everything else, SK-NIC says.

The domains to be sold — I count 277 — are listed here (pdf). They’re all either one-character or matches for existing TLDs, but sk.sk is not on the list.

.sk is of course the ccTLD for Slovakia, but it’s owned from the UK following CentralNic’s acquisition of SK-NIC and has no local presence requirements. There are over 471,000 registered domains today, according to the registry.

Comment Tagged: .sk, auctions, centralnic, scdn, single-character, sk-nic, team internet

Straggler gTLD signs first ICANN contract for years

One of the outstanding contested gTLDs from the 2012 application round looks set to be delegated finally, after the winning bidder signed its Registry Agreement with ICANN.

Merck Registry Holdings Inc is now the officially contracted registry for .merck, and it appears the intent is to be a dot-brand jointly controlled by two unaffiliated chemical companies of the same name.

An American company and a German company, both called Merck and with common roots that were severed during World War I, now seem set to have equal ownership rights to .merck, after over a decade of legal wrangling.

Both companies applied for .merck, and according to the ICANN process the American one won because the German one withdrew its application.

However, the winning application was amended in 2021 to say that the registry intends to transfer its contract to a newly formed UK company called MM Domain Holdco Ltd.

Company records indicate that this shell firm is a 50:50 joint venture of the two Mercks, with over a million dollars cash in the bank.

It seems that the two firms intend to share the gTLD, and run it as a dot-brand for both of their benefit, which is pretty rare.

7 Comments Tagged: dot-brands, ICANN, merck, new gTLDs

GoDaddy likely to win relaxed .xxx deal

GoDaddy seems set to get a renewed and relaxed .xxx registry contract, after ICANN dismissed the concerns of critics of the deal.

In a much-delayed analysis of submissions to a recent public comment period, Org indicated that it is in favor of GoDaddy, via subsidiary ICM Registry, migrating to a Registry Agreement much more in line with sister gTLDs .porn, .adult and .sex.

That would mean an end to the “sponsored” status of .xxx, removing the largely pointless restrictions and streamlining the registration process, and the dissolution of IFFOR, the nominal sponsor, which was criticized by one commenter as a toothless “gravy train”.

Only nine comments were received, and views were mixed, but where commenters were critical of the proposed deal ICANN has stood firm.

Notably, Org dismissed the idea that a public comment period on a Registry Agreement renewal is an appropriate forum to question whether a signatory to that Registry Agreement has historically complied with its terms.

At least two commenters had raised issues, some of which I have reported, about whether ICM had stuck to promises related to funding IFFOR and whether IFFOR had stuck to promises to issue cash grants to worthy causes.

Commenters also said that ICM has already stopped verifying the identities of registrants in its made-up “sponsored community”, which would have enabled it to more easily tackle repeatedly abusive registrants.

But ICANN doesn’t think that kind of thing — which it files under “Misconceptions, assumptions, and allegations and claims” — is suitable for discussion in Public Comments.

“If there are concerns regarding ICM’s compliance with the .XXX RA, such concerns (if any) should be raised with ICANN Compliance for investigation and are considered outside of the scope of this Public Comment proceeding,” the analysis reads.

There’s also no need to replace ICM’s sponsorship commitments with Public Interest Commitments along the lines of those found in most post-2012 gTLDs, according to the Org analysis.

“ICANN has not identified a need to add further, new obligations for the operation of .XXX or to treat .XXX differently than other adult-themed gTLDs, particularly in light of the similar PICs that the .ADULT, .PORN, and .SEX gTLDs have utilized for approximately the last decade,” it reads.

The .xxx agreement was due to expire in early 2021, but its term has been repeatedly extended as negotiations continued behind the scenes. Likewise, the public comment analysis was originally due to be published in late May but was repeatedly delayed.

It’s now up to ICANN’s board of directors, which has already been briefed on the analysis contents, to approve the renegotiated deal.

5 Comments Tagged: godaddy, ICANN, icm registry, xxx

Tonkin promoted to CEO at auDA

Australian ccTLD overseer auDA has appointed industry veteran Bruce Tonkin to CEO.

It’s an internal promotion; Tonkin has been chief operating officer at auDA since 2018.

He’s replacing Rosemary Sinclair, who intends to leave at the end of the year.

Tonkin was formerly chief strategy officer of Melbourne IT, one of the very first batch of registrars accredited by ICANN a quarter-century ago. It’s now part of Webcentral, though the brand was resurrected a couple years ago.

He also spent nine years on the ICANN board of directors.

1 Comment Tagged: .au, auda