Latest news of the domain name industry

Recent Posts

Christian group opposes .sex, .porn, .adult

Kevin Murphy, July 11, 2012, 07:20:05 (UTC), Domain Registries

Morality In Media, one of the groups that fought the approval of .xxx for years, has launched a letter-writing campaign against the proposed .sex, .porn and .adult top-level domains.

ICANN has received a couple dozen comments of objection to the three gTLDs over the last couple of days, apparently due to this call-to-arms.

Expect more. MIM was one of the main religion-based objectors to .xxx, responsible for crapflooding ICANN with thousands of comments in the years before the gTLD was approved.

Now that .xxx has turned out to be less successful than ICM Registry hoped, MIM feels its key belief on the subject — that porn gTLDs lead to more porn — has been vindicated.

MIM president Patrick Trueman wrote in one of his comments:

During the years of this fight against the .xxx domain, we said many times that the establishment of a .xxx domain would increase, not decrease the spread of pornography on the Internet, causing even more harm to children, families and communities, and make ICANN complicit in that harm.

That prediction has been fulfilled because the porn sites on the .com domain have not vacated the .com and moved to .xxx. Rather, as we have seen, the .xxx has just added thousand of additional porn sites on the Internet and .com porn sites stayed put. ICANN bears responsibility for this. The .xxx was not needed.

For some reason, the complaints are only leveled at the three ICM Registry subsidiaries that are applying for porn-themed gTLDs, and not the other .sex applicant.

Uniregistry’s application for .sexy has not been targeted.

And MIM has apparently not read the applications it is complaining about; its call to action complains about non-porn companies having to pay “protection money” to defensively register in .sex.

However, the three ICM bids explicitly contemplate an extensive grandfathering program under which all current defensive registrations in .xxx would be reserved in .sex, .porn and .adult.

Tagged: , , , , , , ,

Comments (1)

  1. Scott Pinzon says:

    The MIM call to arms is filled with factually incorrect statements. An example of their failure to research their own topic is that they encourage objectors to send their comments to the String Similarity Evaluation Panel. Good luck getting .porn shut down on the basis that the string is confusingly similar to .xxx!

    They also say porn would be no easier to block if it all lived under one TLD. In actuality, that’s the dream every objector to porn should be pushing for.

    I have to wonder if MIM’s efforts are sincere, or merely the “terror of the month” raised to boost their fundraising.

Add Your Comment