Google names the dates for .fly launch

Google seems to have accelerated its launch plans for .fly, one of the 2012-round gTLDs it’s been sitting on for over a decade.

The company’s registry division has notified ICANN that it plans to open its mandatory sunrise period for .fly on September 1 and keep it open until November 9.

General availability for the gTLD, which according to its 2012 application will be open to all with no eligibility restrictions, seems to have been scheduled for November 10.

Earlier documentation filed with ICANN showed early 2027 launch dates.

The original application states that the namespace is intended for, as you might expect, airlines and the travel industry. As such, it would compete with the likes of .travel and .aero.

Google has already registered get.fly to itself, but the name does not yet appear to resolve.

Harassment down, bitchiness up at ICANN

ICANN’s Ombuds dealt with 50% more cases in its last-reported year, with most of the growth attributable to community members who just can’t seem to get along.

In a recently published annual report (pdf), covering the period to the end of June 2025 (yes, it really is published a whole year after the fact), the Ombuds said that it opened 248 tickets in the year.

But 212 of those — basically the same as the previous year — were ruled “out of scope”, perhaps because they were requests for information or help rather that outright complaints.

The remaining 36, up from 24 in the prior year, were ruled “in-scope”. Eight of those cases were complaints.

The Ombuds splits cases into two buckets — “unfairness” and “interpersonal and relational”. Unfairness cases were flat at 16, but down as a percentage from 67% to 44% due to the interpersonal category growing from seven cases to 20.

The interpersonal bucket refers to how community members interact in their working groups and such. It covers harassment, conflict, uncivil language and behavior.

Combined, cases concerning these behaviors accounted for 56% of the total, but the Ombuds reported that only two of those were at the level of claims of harassment.

A free, ethical new gTLD? Shurely shome mishtake

Another new gTLD applicant has revealed its plans, this time for a namespace where domains are given away for free and the enemy is Big Tech.

The Human-Centered Computing Foundation, a non-profit founded in Colorado last November, says it plans to apply for .self in the current ongoing ICANN application round.

It says it has already been approved under ICANN’s Applicant Support Program, meaning its application costs will be deeply discounted from the $227,000 standard base fee.

The organization has published little information about its plans, other than to say .self will be “designed and implemented from the ground up to support self-hosting”.

HCCF says it opposes the “prevailing economic models of the digital age — surveillance capitalism and entrapping SaaS platforms” that “prioritize corporate shareholder value over the fundamental needs, privacy, and autonomy of the individual.”

Because the domains will be free, domain investors are not welcome.

The organization’s web site lists Riley O’Donnell and Lucas Silva as CEO and COO respectively.

A search on DI’s Stringtel tool show domains ending in “self” occur about as frequently as existing gTLDs “contractors”, “bike” and “tattoo”, with “yourself” and “myself” counting for about half of the volume.

“Bulletproof” registrar gets an ICANN bollocking

ICANN has slapped an intensely privacy-focused registrar that compares its stance on takedowns to Elon Musks with a lengthy breach-of-contract notice, claiming that the company is disregarding legitimate abuse reports for no good reason.

Estonia-based Fewmoretaps, which changed its brand to Trustname.com not long after its accreditation was approved in early 2024, has been friendly to malware distributors that use its services, according to ICANN.

The breach notice claims that Trustname, after it had discovered that an abuse report was valid and that one of its customers’ domains was being used to spread malware, did not suspend the domain as required.

Rather, it gave the registrant a three-day headsup to move their domain to another registrar, according to ICANN.

It additionally ignored multiple abuse reports, often for spurious reasons, the notice claims, often only taking action on abusive domains after ICANN Compliance itself got it touch.

Trustname says it is a “registrar built for businesses in competitive niches that often face false or bad-faith abuse reports” and makes hay out of the fact that it offers “bulletproof” privacy by masking registrants details behind two different proxy services located in different jurisdictions.

While the company’s web site claims ad nauseam that its services are not to be used for illegal purposes such as child abuse material and opioid sales, it boldly states that it “disregards” copyright infringement notices.

“Like Elon Musk, we have a strong aversion to individuals who exploit the DMCA, as we believe it lacks legal authority for the vast majority of the world’s population,” the site states.

IP matters are not covered by ICANN contracts, which defined abuse as malware, pharming, phishing and a subset of spam, of course.

Trustname’s site states that it will only take action against domains in “extreme scenarios”.

Such scenarios include “using your website to host illegal content (that we have confirmed after thorough investigations) and getting court orders from all three jurisdictions.”

The three jurisdictions are the US and Saint Kitts & Nevis, where its proxy partners are located, and its home nation of Estonia. Saint Kitts-based Harakiri (Perfect Privacy LLC) was specifically chosen because court orders are hard to come by there.

The company additionally states, in what could be interpreted as an admission of guilt by ICANN Compliance standards:

We will never take any action against a domain name simply because someone filed a complaint – even if your report indicates a violation of our terms. We will only be obligated to take action when we get the relevant court orders.

Trustname, which had fewer than 1,500 gTLD domains under management at the last count, has been given until July 1 to come back into compliance or risk losing its accreditation.

ICANN lays out new rules for navel-gazing

ICANN is set to cut back on the amount of navel-gazing it carries out, dramatically scaling back how often it reviews its own structure and performance.

The community’s unashamedly meta “Review of Reviews” has produced fruit on schedule, with a set of principles set to be opened for discussion at the ICANN 86 meeting in Seville, Spain which kicks off this weekend.

The Cross Community Group that came up with the new framework would see some reviews that are currently mandated by ICANN’s bylaws eliminated altogether and others put on a substantially longer cycle.

The CCG is recommending that only two reviews are mandatory, the Accountability & Transparency Review, which would occur every five years, and an ICANN Structural Review which would run every 15 years instead of the current five.

The Registration Directory Service Review, which according to the bylaws has to review Whois policy every five years, does not appear to feature in the new recommendations. Either does the Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice Review.

The five-yearly Security, Stability, and Resiliency Review would now be treated as an “On-Demand Review”, a new category of review that can be called for by the community if a very high voting threshold is met.

The proposals already have their detractors among the community’s constituency groups.

The Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group has concerns that they would favor highly resourced interest groups at the expense of marginalized communities, for example, while the Intellectual Property Constituency believes eliminating some of the reviews poses a risk of DNS abuse and IP infringement.

There will be a session on the proposals in Seville on Monday.

Surprising nobody, ICANN calls off Oman meeting

The bad news: ICANN has cancelled its meeting in Oman this October. The good news: you’re all going to Bali instead!

The ICANN 87 Annual General Meeting will now take place at the conference center attached to The Westin Resort Nusa Dua, Bali, Indonesia, from October 17 to 22. Those are the same dates as the scheduled meeting in Muscat.

While ICANN scrupulously avoided explicitly laying the blame at the feet of Donald Trump, from whom the Org has been cowering since his second term as US president began, the relocation of the AGM is not unexpected and certainly due to the ongoing US-Israeli war on Iran.

While the timing may be coincidental, ICANN’s announcement came less than a week after an increasingly unpredictable Trump threatened to bomb Oman, which has been acting largely as a neutral mediator to date.

But ICANN merely said:

The decision to relocate the meeting was made in consultation with the meeting hosts and local partners in Oman, with a shared focus on ensuring that the AGM can proceed on schedule and support broad global participation.

…

Accessibility, travel reliability, and the ability to participate, both in person and online, are essential to its success. In light of recent developments affecting regional airspace, ICANN has taken this step now to provide certainty for participants and ensure the meeting can move forward as planned.

Bali is of course a popular tourist destination in the Asia-Pacific region — and the beachfront Westin looks gorgeous — it is a long slog for ICANN participants from North American and Europe. But the risk of accidentally getting shot down is much reduced.

It’s the second time in less than a year ICANN has postponed a meeting in Oman due to regional instability.

Four registrars get terminated

Four companies have had their gTLD accreditations terminated, as ICANN continues to clear up its backlog of long-dormant deadbeat registrars.

The unrelated entities are US-based Domus, Finland-based Globis, Hong Kong-based Overcasts, and Wanyuhulian Technology from China. They’ve all lost their ICANN contracts as of May 29.

No domains are at risk, as none of the registrars had any gTLD names under management. Two of them never sold a single domain.

All of the companies in question were in breach for failing to pay their accreditation fees. One of them inexplicably had its accreditation renewed last year despite already being past due.

ICANN director and African internet pioneer Barrett dies

Alan Barrett, a member of ICANN’s board of directors and an internet pioneer in his home of South Africa has died, according to ICANN.

The Org said that Barrett died of recently-diagnosed cancer yesterday, May 28. An online memorial is being planned, but his family have requested privacy in the meantime, ICANN said.

Barrett was involved in setting up the first internet connections to universities in South Africa and the launch of the first commercial ISP there in the 1990s, according to his biography.

He also served as CEO of AFRINIC, the Regional Internet Registry for Africa, from 2015 to 2019.

“Alan was a kind man, who listened to others,” ICANN CEO Kurt Lindqvist wrote on social media. “When Alan spoke you listened as he was always well read, balanced and would suggest a path forward on thorny issues.”

He was the Address Supporting Organization’s two-time appointment to the ICANN board and his second term was due to expire at the conclusion of the 2027 Annual General Meeting.

More cheap new gTLD applications approved

ICANN has approved 18 more requests for reduced-fee new gTLD applications under its Applicant Support Program.

As of last week, the Org said it has conditionally approved a total of 16 requests, up by 13 on a month earlier, and fully approved 27, up by five. “Fully approved” means ICANN has received payment from the applicant.

Only one request has so far been rejected, because the applying entity was found not to be eligible for the program.

There are now a total of 44 applications that have been processed, with 32 more in the pipeline.

The ASP offers up to an 80% discount on the $227,000 base new gTLD application fee, along with a range of other perks, to non-profit organizations on tight budgets.

Whois about to get even more useless

Trying to get hold of a domain registrant via their Whois record? It could be about to get even more difficult following an ICANN advisory that gives GoDaddy a pass for its current practices.

The advisory could make it harder for domain buyers to contact the owners of domains they are interested in, and easier for registrars to sell their domain brokerage services.

There’s a strict requirement under the current ICANN Registration Data Policy that registrars “MUST Publish an email address or a link to a web form to facilitate email communication” in their RDAP/Whois output.

The web form option is pretty much the de facto standard; the registrant’s email address is publicly redacted, but the registrar offers to forward communications to the address it has on record.

But there’s been some controversy about what “facilitate email communication” means.

If you query a domain sponsored by the likes of Tucows or 101domain, you’ll get a form that allows you to submit free text much like you would with a regular email.

With the likes of Markmonitor or Porkbun, you’ll get the same type of form, but only after you’re verified your own email address. Namecheap provides a proxified email address in its RDAP output, no web form required.

But some registrars, notably GoDaddy and Dynadot among the largest providers, do not give a free text option. You can only select from one of three options — abuse, IP infringement, or a “research” catch-all — and hope the registrant agrees to reach out to you on that very vague basis.

If you’re a domainer, there’s no way to use the GoDaddy form to say “Hey, I like your name, I’ll give you $5k for it.”

ICANN has now clarified that the GoDaddy model is perfectly fine under the policy, which “does not include an explicit requirement that registrars provide a free text option or forwarding capabilities as the means of facilitating the communication”.

What GoDaddy and Dynadot are doing “does not violate current requirements under the Policy”, ICANN stated.

This clarification could mean that other registrars could begin to copy the GoDaddy model, if they believe it will benefit them in some way, such as by making an expensive brokerage service the most efficient way for domainers to contact prospective sellers.