Big .gdn registrar at risk
A registrar that exclusively sells .gdn domain names seems to have gone AWOL, and ICANN Compliance is on its case.
Dubai-based Intracom Middle East has been slapped with a breach notice alleging failures to operate a compliant RDAP server, publish the names of its officers, pay its ICANN fees, and escrow its registrant data.
Some of these breaches seem to be due to the fact that the company’s web site is missing in action, today returning NXDOMAIN errors, and has quite possibly been repeatedly hacked.
Archived versions of its site from last year show it was at various times a Polish risotto recipes splog, an Indian burger joint, and a manga cosplay porn site.
It’s Intracom’s second brush with Compliance. Three years ago the case was escalated to a three-month accreditation suspension for pretty much the same infractions.
Unlike most recent Compliance actions, which have been against registrars with essentially no domains under management, this times some domains are actually at risk — over 10,000 of them in fact.
Intracom specializes/d in selling .gdn domains for under a buck apiece. Apart from a few dozen registrations in a few other gTLDs, all of its 10,000 domains were in .gdn. It was once .gdn’s biggest registrar, though that’s no longer the case.
The company has been given to the end of the month to comply or risk termination.
ICANN “reaffirms its commitment to diversity and inclusion”
It’s not exactly a U-turn, but ICANN has issued a statement clarifying that it’s still committed to the values of “diversity and inclusion”, if perhaps not the words themselves.
CEO Kurt Lindqvist posted on the ICANN blog last night:
While some terminology may have changed, the values that guide our work have not. Our actions and commitments remain the same. We have not stepped back from, retreated from, or abandoned ICANN’s core values, or an environment where all voices are welcomed, respected, and valued.
The metadata summary of the post, which shows up in RSS feeds and such if not the visible components of the web page itself, reads: “ICANN reaffirms its commitment to diversity and inclusion amid recent updates to webpage language.”
There have been no changes to policy or ICANN programs like the Fellowship or NextGen, he wrote.
The post follows the revelation last Thursday that ICANN had expunged almost all references to “diversity” and “inclusion” from a page formerly called “Diversity at ICANN” and now called “Representation at ICANN”.
What Lindqvist’s clarification does not clarify, or even address, are the reasons why ICANN felt the need to suddenly and sharply distance itself from language it has been enthusiastically promoting for over a year.
But perhaps no explanation is necessary. Anyone paying a modicum of attention to US politics this year can’t have failed to notice that the abbreviation “DEI” — diversity, equity, inclusion — has become politically toxic and the target of attacks from the Trump administration and its loyal MAGA followers.
What we seem to be looking at here is the ICANN equivalent of the Department of Defense panickedly erasing the Enola Gay from its web site.
While ICANN’s structural ties to the US government have been pretty loose and minimal since the IANA transition in 2016, it really doesn’t need to find itself fighting off a Trump attempt to renationalize the root.
ICANN kills off diversity and inclusion
ICANN seems to have become the latest American organization to back away from commitments to “diversity” and “inclusion” in the wake of a universe now controlled by the whims of Donald Trump.
The Org has recently started removing references to the D-word from its web site, sloppily editing its diversity-related web pages, replacing it with the less politically loaded term “representation”.
The “Diversity at ICANN” page is now called the “Representation at ICANN” page, and ICANN’s stated commitments have been changed from:
ICANN is entrusted with ensuring the stability, resiliency, and interoperability of the Internet’s unique identifier systems in an open Internet, and was founded on the belief that it should reflect the diversity of the Internet community.
to:
ICANN is entrusted with ensuring the stability, resiliency, and interoperability of the Internet’s unique identifier systems Internet and was founded on the belief that it should represent the broad Internet community.
The words “inclusive” and “inclusion”, also from the now apparently toxic “DEI” abbreviation, also seem to be deemed inappropriate. ICANN has changed its web site language from:
To live up to this responsibility, ICANN is committed to promoting greater diversity and supporting broad, inclusive participation in its processes.
to the apparently hastily edited (random comma in original):
To live up to this responsibility, ICANN is committed to supporting broad, participation in its processes.
The page no longer contains links to ICANN’s Diversity & Inclusion Toolkit, a set of educational materials designed to tell people that asking other community members where they come from means they’re a racist.
Also gone is the link to an ICANN Learn course on “Unconscious Bias”, which teaches you that not all nurses are female and not all CEOs are white men and apparently ICANN has money to burn.
While ICANN previously said it offers its staff “Diversity & Inclusion Training”, it now says it offers “Culture Training”.
All six references to “inclusion” present in the November 2024 archived page have been removed from today’s live page. All five uses of the word “inclusive” have also been deleted.
The November archive uses the word “diversity” 32 times and “diverse” twice. On the live page, those counts are down to two (where the word was used to refer to a named group or report), and none, respectively.
The link to “Diversity at ICANN” in the web site’s site-wide footer has also been removed.
Some of the edits are incredibly sloppy. The old page had a bullet point that read:
Community-wide surveys on Age Diversity and Participation and Gender Diversity and Participation
The findings offer insights into perceptions of gender and age diversity in the community, potential and perceived barriers to participation, and the community’s support for initiatives to enhance age and gender diversity.
But that now reads:
Community-wide surveys and
The findings offer insights into perceptions of gender and age in the community, potential and perceived barriers to participation, and the community’s support for initiatives to enhance understanding.
ICANN’s backtracking from earlier virtue signalling comes at a point in history when corporate America is steering away from DEI initiatives lest they incur the wrath of US President Donald Trump.
The question is: is this all just cosmetic, or will it affect ICANN policy?
The Org is currently considering changes to its Community Anti-Harassment Policy that would change the boundaries of what is considered acceptable behavior at ICANN meetings.
The proposed changes would either, depending on your point of view, a) make life more comfortable for people with protected characteristics, or b) make it easier to get cancelled for a cultural faux pas.
It’s been a few months since the public comments closed on the policy changes, so ICANN board action shouldn’t be far off. Will the Org’s retreat from DEI have an impact on its decision?
Kaufmann picked for ICANN board
Christian Kaufmann from Akamai has been reselected to represent the Address Supporting Organization on ICANN’s board of directors.
He’s the incumbent in Seat 10, having first been picked by the ASO in 2022, but he faced competition this time from Australian Karl Kloppenborg of Reset Data.
Kaufmann’s current term ends at ICANN 84 in October, but will be immediately extended for another three years.
Conflicted? STFU under new ICANN rules
ICANN community members who refuse to disclose their conflicts of interest should keep their mouths shut during public meetings, according to a proposed new code of conduct now open for comment.
An updated Community Participant Code of Conduct Concerning SOIs was published this week, following an initial public comment period late last year, which saw some community members ask for more clarity on what the rules mean in practice.
A key change states that people who won’t disclose their potential conflicts shouldn’t even get up to the mic to express an opinion in public, even when they’re not directly participating in policy-making.
“When disclosure cannot be made, the participant must not participate in ICANN processes or make interventions at ICANN sessions on that issue,” the new draft states (changes in bold).
The change might lead to some community members staying in their seats or keeping their microphones muted during discussions at public ICANN meetings.
The policy is intended to improve the perceived legitimacy of ICANN’s processes and policies by forcing community volunteers to publish a statement of interest (SOI) naming who’s paying their wages.
The proposal has largely been championed by registries, registrars and governments, and opposed by lawyers in private practice, some of whom think they shouldn’t, or ethically can’t, name their clients.
The argument goes that if somebody is being paid by a company that wants to torpedo or delay the new gTLD program, or is working on a patent covering RDAP, you’d want to know if they were working on policies covering new gTLDs or RDAP.
The counter-argument goes that if an attorney is working on new gTLD policy on behalf of Coca-Cola, putting that information in an SOI would tip off Pepsi that a .coke gTLD application is in the works.
The updated policy draft clarifies what SOIs must disclose — it doesn’t just cover employers or clients — and provides lengthy guidance on specific scenarios where disclosures must be made.
The types of interests that should be disclosed are broad, and cover a variety of influences and relationships, both monetary and nonmonetary. These could include: familial relationships; employment relationships; agreements to represent a specific person, entity or group of entities; vendor or contracting relationships; stock/equity ownership (other than de minimis ownership); and all similar types of influences and relationships that impact the discloser’s participation within ICANN. Interests can be general or they can be issue-specific.
Working group chairs would get the right (though not, it seems, the obligation) to temporarily kick anyone found to be in violation of the rules. Complaints could also be escalated to the Ombuds, but she’s not getting any extra enforcement powers.
Lawyers have had their objections to the policy roundly rejected. The guidelines now state:
When an attorney is engaged to participate in ICANN on behalf of a client, while that attorney holds specific duties to their client, those duties do not override the need for others participating within ICANN to understand what other interests are advocating and participating within ICANN processes… when that attorney starts participating within processes, such as participating in mailing lists, making public comments, joining working groups, etc., on behalf of that client, the client’s and attorney’s obligations to the broader ICANN community emerge
The updated policy clarifies that governments enjoy some immunity — they don’t have to disclose who lobbied them on a particular issue they’re engaged with — with ICANN assuming their nations’ own transparency laws will cover that type of thing.
For the domain industry, volunteers will have to disclose all the roles their employer has. Nominet, for example, would have to disclose that it’s a ccTLD registry, a contracted gTLD registry, and a back-end registry services provider.
The policy now also provides guidance for trade groups, academics and IP owners.
The draft is now open for public comment until June 30. It’s possibly the last chance you’ll get to file a comment without disclosing your interests.
Gname adds another 200 registrars
Singaporean drop-catching registrar Gname has added another 200 shell registrars to its collection, bringing its total to over 500.
The 200 companies are named Gname 301 Inc through Gname 500 Inc. More accreditations means more connections to gTLD registries and a better chance to catch expired domains when they are deleted.
Gname last boosted its portfolio of shells in December 2023, when it doubled its number from 150 to 300.
The latest accreditations will have cost $700,000 in up-front application fees and will add an extra $800,000 to Gname’s costs due to ICANN’s $4,000 flat annual accreditation fee.
This of course has a positive effect on ICANN’s finances. Its fiscal 2025 budget predicted 40 new registrars, and even its high estimate was only for an increase of 57.
It had only accredited 24 new registrars in this fiscal year before Gname’s move.
An extra $1.2 million it wasn’t expecting is almost enough to cover its community volunteers’ hotels bill for a whole year.
Gname’s main accreditation had almost five million domains under management, making it the ninth-largest accreditation of the now over 3,000 on ICANN’s books.
Two deadbeat registrars get their ICANN marching orders
ICANN has terminated the registrar accreditation agreements of two Chinese companies, which appear to be under common ownership, because they didn’t pay their bills.
EJEE Group Beijing and VIP Internet Industry are both losing their contracts, effective later this month. Both have common contact details, apparently run by the same person who had another registrar terminated in 2017.
EJEE does its business at category-killer domain domain.cn, though the registration storefront appears to be broken. VIP Internet’s web site appears to be down entirely.
While both companies have sold thousands of domains in their time, both have had just one or two gTLD domains under management for the last 12 months, according to my records. No registrants will be affected, in other words.
ICANN seems to have been chasing the registrars for their overdue fees since March 2023, over two years ago, according to the termination notices.
ICANN cuts off money to UASG
ICANN is the stop funding and supporting the Universal Acceptance Working Group, an independent outside group tasked with making sure domain names work everywhere on the internet regardless of TLD or language.
With no money or staff support, Org has likely signed the death warrant for the UASG, but ICANN insists it’s not turning its back on UA as a general principle.
“With the focus changing to implementation work, ICANN will no longer provide funding or staff support to the UASG after June 2025,” ICANN CEO Kurt Lindqvist wrote in a blog post today.
I don’t believe ICANN has ever revealed publicly how much money it was giving the group, but it was clearly significant enough to warrant review at a time when ICANN is tightening its belt in the face of budget pressures.
Budgets published in previous years have put UASG’s spending at anywhere from $500,000 to $1.4 million a year.
The move probably shouldn’t come as a huge surprise. A close reading of a board resolution from ICANN 82 in March strongly suggests ICANN was gently breaking the news that it planned to wind down the group.
Lindqvist’s post and the resolution both point out that UASG’s founding charter, written in 2015, called for it to be a 10-year awareness-raising project, and that 10 years is now up.
Lindqvist said ICANN will create a UA Expert Working Group of “invited members and nominated representatives” from across the community to “provide guidance for ICANN’s work on UA adoption”.
While the UASG has been mainly focused on internationalized domain names and awareness-raising in parts of the world that might not track ICANN very closely, much of the hands-on work has been done by ICANN itself.
Last year, Twitter and Meta-owned platforms like Whatsapp updated their linkification code base to more effectively support UA, but that seems to have happened largely due to ICANN engineers battering on their doors.
ICANN has also taken to directly engaging with smaller open source projects, many of which develop libraries used in much larger platforms, to make sure they support the freshest TLDs, regardless of script.
Lindqvist said ICANN will to continue to support UA Day, a series of educational gatherings held around the world each year.
Dot-brand actually being used to get deleted
A Chinese clothing company has asked ICANN to delete its dot-brand gTLD, despite the fact that it is being used for web sites and email.
Redstone Haute Couture wants rid of .redstone, which has been in active use for almost a decade.
My database shows that it has about a dozen names, most registered in 2016 and most of which resolve, not redirect, to web sites.
Several have MX records, suggesting they are or were being used for email too.
No reason was given for Redstone’s request. The brand itself doesn’t seem have been retired, though the company is perhaps better known for its product lines such as Giada and Curiel.
The company was using ZDNS as its back-end registry services provider.
Private Whois requests hit new low after Tucows quits RDRS
March saw the lowest number of requests for private Whois data via ICANN’s Registration Data Request Service since the system launched in late 2023.
ICANN’s latest stats show that there were just 91 requests last month, compared to February’s 143 and the previous low, from last November, of 103.
The dip can probably attributed at least in part to the departure of eight companies from the pool of participating registrars.
Notably, Tucows pulled its four accreditations from the service. Four shell registrars belonging to Tracer (Focus IP) also withdrew because their accreditations have been terminated.
Of the 1,307 domain lookups via RDRS in March, also a new low, 19% were for domains at non-participating registrars. That was up slightly from 17% in February and compares to 25% from the service’s launch.
The average time for a request to be approved was 3.3 days, the second-lowest of any monthly reporting period to date. Denials took on average just over a week. Both metrics were well below the lifetime average.
Intellectual property owners and law enforcement are still the largest categories of requestor, together accounting for almost half of requests in March.
Interestingly, UK cops have now submitted more requests for private data than police from any other country, including the US. Law enforcement requests since last October now stand at 30 for the UK and 29 for the US.
Recent Comments