Latest news of the domain name industry

Recent Posts

We grassed up .TOP, says free abuse outfit

Kevin Murphy, July 18, 2024, 18:36:56 (UTC), Domain Services

A community-run URL “blacklist” project has claimed credit for the complaints that led to .TOP Registry getting hit by an ICANN Compliance action earlier this week.

.TOP was told on Tuesday that it has a month to sort of its abuse-handing procedures or risk losing the .top gTLD, which has over three million domains.

ICANN said the company had failed to respond to an unspecified complainant that had reported multiple phishing attacks, and now the source of that complaint has revealed itself in a news release.

URLAbuse says it was the party that reported the attacks to .TOP, which according to ICANN happened in mid April.

“Despite repeated notifications, the .TOP Registry Operator failed to address these issues, prompting URLAbuse to escalate the matter to ICANN,” URLAbuse said, providing a screenshot of ICANN’s response.

URLAbuse provides a free abuse blocklist that anyone is free to incorporate into their security setup. Domain industry partners include Radix, XYZ.com and Namecheap.


If you find this post or this blog useful or interestjng, please support Domain Incite, the independent source of news, analysis and opinion for the domain name industry and ICANN community.

Tagged: , , , , ,

Comments (3)

  1. Theo Geurts says:

    It is a very good feed. And for free, we have been using it for a while now.
    https://realtimeregister.com/what-we-offer/domain-products/abuse-monitoring/

    If only others would use the same model and provide registrars with intelligence to act on.

    Which is a real hassle, adding a few commercial feeds to block stuff, the cost goes up really high, and not something wholesale registrars can afford.

    A shout-out to https://red.flag.domains/ another excellent feed.

  2. Matthias Pfeifer says:

    >Which is a real hassle, adding a few commercial >feeds to block stuff, the cost goes up really high, >and not something wholesale registrars can >afford.

    Well, this was an important question: Why wouldn’t ICANN share abuse data and lists so RO/RAs could use it for abuse mitigation. This would be really helpful rather that all the other mockery ICANN does (regarding abuse mitigation).

    Well, its just a rhetorical question .. i known the answer is money 😉

    • Rubens Kuhl says:

      Most, if not all, feeds prohibit redistribution. So the money issue is not ICANN’s or Contracted Parties’, but the business model of those feed producers.

Add Your Comment