Recent Posts
- Cybersquatting cases down in .uk
- As .boots self-terminates, ICANN will not redelegate it
- GoDaddy launches security service after Sucuri acquisition
- Zero registrars pass ICANN audit
- Zone file access is crap, security panel confirms
- Ombudsman steps in after harassment claims in Whois group
- US “threatens” Costa Rica over Pirate Bay domains
- Forget emojis, you can buy Egyptian hieroglyph .com domains
- Donuts to pay $213 million for Rightside
- Bladel quits as Council chair as GoDaddy ruled “ineligible” for election
- Should ICANN get breastfeeding areas? Have your say!
- Domain President? Dicker fallout continues as Schwartz unleashes tweetstorm
- InternetNZ wants to fire two of its three (!) CEOs
- CIRA and Nominum offering DNS firewall
- DENIC gets approved for registry escrow
- ICANN scraps remote meeting hubs
- MMX says .vip renewals to be at 70%+
- About that $3,800 emoji domain sale…
- ICANN finds no conflict of interest in .sport decision
- .music and .gay CPE probe could end this month
- Time to show ICANN who’s boss!
- .xyz sets price for numeric domains at $0.65
- Sixteen-year-old emoji .com sells for €3,400
- $5 billion e-commerce site to dump .com for dot-brand
- Three-million-domain .au deal up for grabs
- Emoji domains get a 👎 from security panel
- Web.com in takeover talks – report
- After price hike, now Tucows drops support for Uniregistry TLDs
- Country names to finally be released in new gTLDs
- Want to be one of the internet’s SEVEN SECRET KEY-HOLDERS? Apply now!
- Richemont kills off two more dot-brands
- Iran reported to Ombudsman after new gTLD conspiracy theory
- Key-Systems buys reseller EDC
- Let’s all have a nosey at how much ICANN staff get paid
- Massive ransomware attack hits 150 countries, brought down by a domain reg
- ICANN’s origin story is well worth a watch
- Neustar’s .au deal in peril as Aussies look in-house
- .gay, .music and others in limbo as ICANN probes itself
- XYZ acquires .storage, its 10th gTLD
- ICANN changes Panama meeting dates to avoid Muslim holiday
- More change at the top at Donuts as Tindal steps down
- Second emergency registry tested with dead dot-brand
- MMX stung for $7.7 million by crappy .london contract?
- Hey, you! Listen to the ICANN board webcast more private sessions
- MarkMonitor tells .feedback to take a hike after “breach” claim
- ICANN attendance shrank in Denmark
- Afnic CEO quits, heads to new mystery job
- Verisign to keep price increase power under new .net contract
- ICANN loosens Whois privacy rules for registrars
- Pirate Bay founder launches piracy-friendly domain privacy service
Five more new gTLDs, one in English, get the nod from China
Top Level Design’s .ink has become the sixth new gTLD in the Latin alphabet to be approved for sale in China.
It was one of four new gTLDs given regulatory approval to begin operating properly in the country late last week. The others were all in Chinese script.
From Finnish-founded TLD Registry, .中文网 (“Chinese web site”) and .在线 (“Chinese online”) gained approval.
From local outfit Guangzhou Yuwei Information Technology Co, .集团 (“group”) and .我爱你 (“I love you”) were given the nod.
It’s the third batch of new gTLDs to get Chinese government approval since .vip, .club and .xyz in December. In January, .site and .shop joined their ranks.
Under China’s Draconian domain name regulations, only domains registered via local registries and registrars may be used.
Registries from outside the country have had to set up a local corporate presence and agree to China’s censorship policies in order to be compliant.
> Registries from outside the country
> have had to set up a local corporate
> presence and agree to China’s
> censorship policies in order to be
> compliant.
And nobody seems to complain about this situation.
Yes, it does not affect foreign customer yet. Yes, there’s money to make so registries are willing to accept any requirements from the chinese government.
And yes, this government will force every registrar/registries to comply with the rules… OUPS, this is not the case yet !
Seriously, are there some counter-power to such situation ?
You make a good point. I’ve long said (though possibly haven’t wrote on in depth yet) that China does not need to take over ICANN if it wants to start censoring outside of its borders. It merely needs to throw a billion or so dollars at its local domainers. Once market forces are on its side, it wouldn’t need ICANN.