Recent Posts
- MMX makes $100,000 .luxe premium sale
- Major registries posting “fabricated” Whois data
- Hold your horses! The last wave of comments on .amazon hasn’t started yet
- .com zone tops 140 million
- .gay picks the absolutely perfect launch date
- Dot-brand .bond has been acquired and will relaunch as a generic this July
- CentralNic grabs more of the reseller market with $16.5 million acquisition
- EURid inks trademark protection deal for non-trademark owners
- CENTR: domain growth now slowest EVER
- Court rules domain name list should stay secret
- ICANN redacts the secrets of Verisign’s .web deal
- Got a spare three grand? For a limited period, you can buy a .th domain name
- Amazon wins! ICANN on verge of approving .amazon despite government outrage
- WordPress-linked .blog dumps Nominet for CentralNic
- Brand-blocking service plotted for porn gTLDs
- Five more gTLD deadbeats fingered by ICANN
- Defunct Famous Four ordered to hand $1.5 million back to investors
- Future of .io domains has become party-political issue in the UK
- ICANN to host first-ever high-stakes dot-brand auction
- Dead dot-brands hit 50
- Turkish government takes over ccTLD
- Pricey .inc does quite well in sunrise
- ICANN plans return to Cancun in 2021
- These five TLDs contain 80% of all child abuse images
- PIR says it has no plans to raise .org prices
- .CLUB to let brands block “trillions” of domains for $2,000
- Another five Amazon TLDs move to Nominet
- Non-coms say .org price cap should be RAISED
- Dot-brand early adopter becomes 48th to disappear
- Donuts acquires its 242nd gTLD
- Non-profits worth $2.6 billion a year say .org price caps should stay
- Governments demand Whois reopened within a year
- These people support scrapping .org price caps
- .org price anger comments top 3,000 as non-profits weigh in
- ICA rallies the troops to defeat .org price hikes. It won’t work
- Karklins beats LaHatte to chair ICANN’s Whois privacy team
- ICANN to approve new UDRP provider
- Amazon tells power-hungry governments to get stuffed
- Oh, the irony! Banned anti-Islam activist shows up on “Turkish” new gTLD domain
- ICANN got hacked by crypto bots
- Revenue dips as Brexit whacks .eu in 2018
- auDA rejects domaining ban but approves second-level domains
- KPMG dumps .com for dot-brand gTLD
- David and Goliath? DotMusic confirms .music win
- Neustar loses most of its Amazon back-end biz to Nominet
- ICANN takes the reins again as .amazon talks fail
- Italian bank is the latest dot-brand to bow out
- .music update: I’m calling it for Costa
- ICA opposes Aussie domaining ban
- “Just give up!” ICANN tells its most stubborn new gTLD applicant
Five more new gTLDs, one in English, get the nod from China
Top Level Design’s .ink has become the sixth new gTLD in the Latin alphabet to be approved for sale in China.
It was one of four new gTLDs given regulatory approval to begin operating properly in the country late last week. The others were all in Chinese script.
From Finnish-founded TLD Registry, .中文网 (“Chinese web site”) and .在线 (“Chinese online”) gained approval.
From local outfit Guangzhou Yuwei Information Technology Co, .集团 (“group”) and .我爱你 (“I love you”) were given the nod.
It’s the third batch of new gTLDs to get Chinese government approval since .vip, .club and .xyz in December. In January, .site and .shop joined their ranks.
Under China’s Draconian domain name regulations, only domains registered via local registries and registrars may be used.
Registries from outside the country have had to set up a local corporate presence and agree to China’s censorship policies in order to be compliant.
> Registries from outside the country
> have had to set up a local corporate
> presence and agree to China’s
> censorship policies in order to be
> compliant.
And nobody seems to complain about this situation.
Yes, it does not affect foreign customer yet. Yes, there’s money to make so registries are willing to accept any requirements from the chinese government.
And yes, this government will force every registrar/registries to comply with the rules… OUPS, this is not the case yet !
Seriously, are there some counter-power to such situation ?
You make a good point. I’ve long said (though possibly haven’t wrote on in depth yet) that China does not need to take over ICANN if it wants to start censoring outside of its borders. It merely needs to throw a billion or so dollars at its local domainers. Once market forces are on its side, it wouldn’t need ICANN.