Unstoppable reveals gTLD bid doomed to fail
It’s finally happened. Somebody has announced an application for a new gTLD that will almost certainly fall foul of ICANN’s rules and be rejected.
The would-be applicant is Farmsent, a United Arab Emirates startup that is building a blockchain-based marketplace for farmers and buyers of farm produce, and its domains partner is Unstoppable Domains.
Unstoppable said last week that the two companies are launching .farms domains on Unstoppable’s alternative naming system, and that an ICANN application for a proper gTLD is in the works.
The company said it “will be collaborating with Farmsent to plan and strategize for the next ICANN gTLD application, further solidifying .farms in the wider domain ecosystem”.
The problem is that .farms will likely be banned under the rules set out in ICANN’s Applicant Guidebook for the next round, unless the current draft recommendations are completely rewritten or rejected.
ICANN is to be told to reject applications for the plural and singular variants of existing gTLDs in the next round, and .farms is of course the plural of .farm, which is one of the few hundred names in Identity Digital’s stable.
The draft recommendations would merely require for ICANN to be informed that an applied-for string is a single or plural variant of an existing gTLD in the same language and check in a dictionary to confirm that is indeed the case.
In the case of .farm and .farms, I doubt the dictionary verification would realistically even be needed — though I’d bet checking that box would be at least one billable hour for somebody — as it’s a pretty clear-cut case of a bannable clash.
The ICANN staff/community working group drafting the recommendations has spent a huge amount of time arguing about the language of the plurals rule. It’s a surprisingly tricky problem, especially when ICANN is terrified of being seen as a content regulator.
If you find this post or this blog useful or interestjng, please support Domain Incite, the independent source of news, analysis and opinion for the domain name industry and ICANN community.
.farms bought the farm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9CdVTCDdEwI
Tipping them off is not fair. You may have deprived us of future entertainment here.
Boo this man!! xD
PDFs located here seem to indicate such rule changes were not adopted by ICANN: https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/string-similarity-review-guidelines-07-02-2024
Also reviewing the current gTLD Application Guidebook, there’s no mention of plural TLDs that I can find.
Can someone provide proof of where such language exists?
The rules have not yet been adopted and the language being drafted is for recommendations that would need to be adopted by the ICANN board. I’ve made some clarifications to the article.
What are you calling current gTLD Application Guidebook ? The one we have right now is 12 years old…
lol they froze registrations for a minute pending discussion with the partner but it’s live again now, should end well