Did Trump just create the world’s next ccTLD?
Could there be a .gz?
I’m sometimes happy that DI has such a narrow beat. Today, it means I don’t have to discuss the legal, political, moral or ethical implications of US President Donald Trump’s just-announced plan for Gaza.
At a press conference last night, Trump said he wants the Palestinians to leave Gaza, to be resettled elsewhere in the region, and for the US to “take over” the territory and have a “long-term ownership position” on it.
The details of Trump’s aspiration are not immediately clear. Is he talking about a military occupation? Annexation? Does he just want to build another golf course?
It’s almost certainly too early to speculate, so let’s speculate.
With Trump talking about US ownership of Gaza, it is not beyond the bounds of possibility that Gaza’s future, should his plan come to fruition, is as a US territory, or something very much like one.
Populated territories of any nation in general get their own ccTLD. Puerto Rico’s .pr and Guam’s .gu are two examples of US territories with their own ccTLDs.
The US annexation of Gaza would not necessarily even have to be legal under international law or recognized by America’s peers in the United Nations to create the possibility of a new ccTLD.
The path to the root involves a lot of buck-passing and at no point includes a qualitative evaluation of whether a territory is legal or otherwise deserving of recognition.
As you may know, ICANN’s IANA department is responsible for adding and removing ccTLDs from the DNS root, but it takes its cues from the International Organization for Standardization.
Under long-standing IANA convention known as ICP-1, any territory with a two-letter code on the ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 list qualifies for a ccTLD. If a registry can show technical nous and local support, it can claim the TLD.
But the ISO takes its cues in turn from the Statistics Division of the United Nations Secretariat, and its M49 standard, “Standard Country or Area Codes for Statistical Use”.
A territory appears on that list as a matter of “statistical convenience” for the UN, and does not imply that the UN or its member states recognize that territory politically.
Palestine itself was granted its ccTLD, .ps, a quarter-century ago, as “Occupied Palestinian Territory”, despite the legal status of the territory being disputed, because UN Stats and ISO decided to put it on their lists.
So Gaza could possibly get its own ccTLD if the US takes it over and splits it from the West Bank, even if it becomes a contested hell-hole where the luxury beachfront hotels are bombed to rubble faster than Trump can build them.
.gz is available, assuming Gaza is not renamed Trumpland or Disneyworld East or something.
If you find this post or this blog useful or interestjng, please support Domain Incite, the independent source of news, analysis and opinion for the domain name industry and ICANN community.
Would this be a good time to mention that the guy who owns the Iraqi domain (.iq) is in Gaza.
Actually he doesn’t have it any more, the US has it now, but if and when they talk about reparations , .IQ comes into question once again.
If Gaza has .gz, can the Postscript folks use .ps then? ISAGN.
I’m not sure ICANN is the best place to decide stuff like this, it speaks to stability. The Internet needs a seciure stable environment and the house of cards that has plagued ICANN sinxce day one may be in for some alterations under the current presiedency.
When that happens, let’s talk about it online and not at a five star hotel in Singapore, mmmkay?