Recent Posts
- Google partners with UN on aids.day, womens.day and more
- Guy wants to be ICANN CEO and turn off 1.5 million Iranian domains
- ICANN kicks the can on .org price cap defeat
- No masks required at ICANN Cancun
- sex.com for sale, but it’s not a domain deal
- ICANN to be told to stop pussyfooting on new gTLDs
- New ICANN boss makes encouraging noises on new gTLDs
- Verisign loses prestige .gov contract to Cloudflare
- Wanted: a gTLD to ban
- Interview: Sandeep Ramchandani on 10 years of Radix and new gTLDs
- sex.xyz sells at $11,000 loss as premium renewal kicks in
- IRP panel tells ICANN to stop being so secretive, again
- Nominet blew six figures vanity-publishing ex-CEO’s book
- New gTLDs grow in China as .cn regs slide
- Domainers grumble as GoDaddy cranks up commission fees
- Namecheap says it won legal fight over .org price caps
- Identity Digital sees abuse up a bit in Q3
- UDRPs up in 2022, firm says
- More details on ICANN’s CEO handover
- Merry Christmas! Marby finally out as ICANN CEO
- ICANN loses another dot-brand, this one in use
- Abuse crackdown likely in next gTLD registrar contract
- ICANN expects to approve Whois Disclosure System next month
- .music gets its first live web site
- CentralNic buys a bunch of web sites for $5.2 million
- Industry outlook gloomy for next year, predicts ICANN
- Content police? ICANN mulls bylaws change
- ICANN bloat to continue as new gTLD program begins
- ICANN spunks a year, $9 million, on new gTLD plans destined for trashcan
- Crawford QUITS as CentralNic CEO
- Drop-catcher adds 100 more registrars after rapid growth
- Domain universe shrinks again: .com and .cn down, .au up
- New gTLD applications to cost about $250,000
- Macy’s scraps .macys gTLD
- Elon Musk chaos credited with surge in .social regs
- InternetNZ says sorry for “institutional racism”
- Melbourne IT to relaunch, return to roots, after $3.4 million acquisition
- Registrars CAN charge for Whois, ICANN grudgingly admits
- New new gTLD registry in town as Rostam buys UNR
- Stop me if you’ve heard this…
- Verisign growth slows with post-Covid blues
- CentralNic gobbles up another registrar
- Blind auditions underway for ICANN’s supreme court
- Right-wing YouTube bought rumble.com from founder for $477,077
- You can’t appeal a UDRP appeal, ICANN Ombudsman says
- Unstoppable Domains stops over 116,000 domains as alt-root TLD goes dark
- CentralNic expects to blow past revenue estimates
- [Guest Post] Hey ICANN: Reporters are not the enemy
- Is ICANN toothless in the face of DNS abuse?
- ICANN to mull bulk registration ban
- .au adds 100,000 names in days after 2LD floodgates open
- Registry launches Ukrainian domains for Russian-occupied region
- DNSSEC claims another ccTLD victim
- Taliban seizing domains to silence journalists
- McCarthy wins Nominet director election
- Nominet “gaslighting” members over fees, candidate claims
- ICANN dodges bullet as American elected to ITU top job
- Identity Digital publishes treasure trove of abuse data
- Paraguay to chair the GAC
- Nominet may owe its members millions, top lawyer says
- ICANN approves ccTLD-killer policy
- .br tops five million names
- ICANN returning to Puerto Rico
- Ukrainians urged to “de-Russify” their domains
- .au passes four million names as 2LDs surge
- .com and .net are the drag factor on domain industry growth
- Nominet gets new CFO
- It’s ICANN versus the blockchain in Kuala Lumpur
- ICANN to “stand up” to Russia at the ITU
- Surprise new chair for ICANN announced
- PIR will launch .giving next month with unusual landrush rules
- Last-minute bombshell in Nominet election — it may be ILLEGAL
- ICANN finished year $24 million ahead but loses $29 million on the markets
- CentralNic picks up marketing firm for up to $19 million
- Whois Disclosure System to cost up to $3.3 million, run for one year
- ICANN director’s registry CEO job up for grabs
- MarkMonitor to join Newfold in $300 million deal
- New ICANN contracts chart the death throes of Whois
- Kiwi Farms domain lands at Epik
- CentralNic passes on abandoned dot-brand
- Cloudflare blocks anti-trans site for “emergency threat to human life”
- GoCompare makes a big bet on a new gTLD
- Epik replaces Monster with younger clone
- Alt-root .eth is getting very big, very fast
- ZADNA under fire over “heavy-handed” new rules
- Identity Digital to release 5,000 reserved names
- Millions of .cn domains disappear
- ICANN throws out prostitution complaint
- CentralNic revenue almost doubles
- Drug dealer sells blunt.com for $165,000
- Did a sexy Russian spy nerf the o.com auction?
- Cancelled misogynist Andrew Tate moves domain to (drumroll)… Epik!
- Google reveals launch dates for two new gTLDs
- Ducos a shoo-in for GNSO Council chair
- NameSilo reports revenue up 33%
- Adoption light with four weeks to .au’s 2LD deadline
- It’s hustings season at Nominet
- ICANN rushes mystery directors onto board in apparent bylaws breach
- ICANN staffing up for next new gTLD round
- Radix premium revenue hits $3.8 million in first half
- GoDaddy shutters Twitter accounts after MMX deal
- nickel.com sells for a hell of a lot more than a nickel
- German motoring club dot-brand crashes out
- Verisign to crack down on Chinese domains
- Whois Disclosure System likely over a year away
- Belgium slashes its ICANN funding in “mission creep” protest
- Diversity takes a hit as NomCom replaces two ICANN directors with newcomers
- RDNH loser files second appeal
- Group crowdfunding crypto to apply to ICANN for blockchain gTLD
- Buyer “phasing out” domain “bought for $2.2 million”
- ShortDot drops premium fees on millions of domains
- Tucows’ domains business stagnates again in Q2
- Malaysia relaxes travel restrictions ahead of ICANN 75
- GMO to sell Unstoppable’s crypto domains
- More rules, but cozier ICANN 75 expected
- India offers dollar regs to celebrate independence
- auDA updates on 2LD .au sales
- At $15 million, nfts.com becomes second-biggest domain sale ever
- Now Nokia scraps a dot-brand
- InternetNZ appoints new CEO
- Looks like XYZ bought another gTLD
- Bugatti dumps dot-brand under new owners
- In pictures: from tuk-tuks to cheese wheels, every ICANN national stereotype 2016-2022
- Did ICANN pay for most meeting attendees to show up in The Hague?
- Verisign announces ANOTHER price increase as regs slide
ICANN tries to limit rogue registrars
As part of its growing efforts to clean up the domain name registrar market, ICANN has introduced background checks for companies applying for accreditation.
ICANN will check criminal and financial records, as well as doing credit checks, on companies that want to be able to sell domains in gTLDs.
As a result, the cost of applying to become a registrar is going up by $1,000, to $3,500, to cover the cost of accessing the relevant third-party databases.
The changes, made largely at the behest of law enforcement participants in ICANN, concerned that some registrars are not what you’d call responsible netizens, come into effect July 1.
The intellectual property lobby had called for the checks to include cybersquatting and UDRP judgements, but those suggestions were not taken on board.
Related posts (automatically generated):
Are Whois email checks doing more harm than good?
Domain registrars pressured into huge shakeup
ICANN offers to split the cost of GAC “safeguards” with new gTLD registries
Tagged: ICANN, law enforcement
What about Registrars known to shelter malware sites? Serving malware goes against the Registrar/user agreement . . . If Registrars shelter instead of censure malware-servers, would that not qualify as criminal?
What if the Registrar itself serves malware?
http://google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=bizcn.com
(Smells like a Godaddy “affiliate.”) Think I’ll be needing to send another missive to Larry Strickling . . .
Great post as always Kevin, but there’s ONE problem. ICANN was supposed to be doing this all along and told me years ago they did this procedure for each Registrar already.
This validates our claim that they haven’t been vetting Registrars at all (except validating the fee check$!)
@Louise, we’ve got documented cases of BizCn violating ICANN rules in order to keep malware sites ACTIVE. Where’s the breach notice?
Garth Bruen seems to be right–as I would expect him to be (I have an account with”Knujon”)–it seemed to me that Internet Service Providers might also be held more responsible for bot-nets involving them and especially so when their clients are the exclusive or main victims of the bot-net. I might add that the Federal Government might have done much more of a, and a better job, administrating. It seems that the Office of Homeland Security left its administrative position with such responsibilities open for two years.
People in the anti-war and pacifist communities have experienced getting viruses after viewing cyber-squater’s replica web site, while replica FBI web pages contain information as to how to avoid spam and malware as it “phishs” for personal information from Nigeria, etc.; and what was done about the “Trojan Horse” “XP 2008”–“XP 2009”, which the New York Times reported on and promised a report in 2008? Considering the magnitude of the problem we are ten years behind the presenting problems themselves–it is as if every city would liquidate their police forces and tell
tell everyone to get a security guard. Steve
It’s been 2 years and yet BizCN continues to operate as usual. A registrant of BizCN has been using my email address to forge headers so that it appears I am sending the emails – which are a scam. The only domain name associated with the actual sender appears in a contact email address in the text message.
I’ve repeatedly reported this abuse of my email address to BizCN and point out that the whois data for domain in the contact email doesn’t appear legit because the information for the physical address (street name and number, city, state, postal code and even country) and telephone number do not coincide. I also point out that there is no website associated with the domain, but now the registrant creates a new domain each week with different (falsified) contact information.
The registrant initially used Regtime, but Regtime appears to have closed, at least temporarily, the fraudulent domains and has not allowed the owner to register any more domains. Okay, so the scammer has gotten a little more clever but I would think that registrars would be required to verify the whois contact information. Of course, BizCN is all too willing to close each domain when someone complains so that the registrant can then purchase a new domain or domains.
How do I contact ICANN to report BizCN to them?