Recent Posts
- Did GMO flunk evaluation on 27 gTLDs? CentralNic takes over the whole lot
- Fly9 offers services to simplify new gTLD sales
- Two failures among latest 44 new gTLD results
- Donuts puts 63 new gTLDs to private auction, but at least 17 are dead on arrival
- ‘Whistleblower’ claims cronyism and fear at ICANN
- Donuts hires the face of the new gTLD program
- Ombudsman probing “late” new gTLD objections
- Healthcare dot-brand drops out of gTLD race
- Afilias dumps .mail bid, and three other new gTLD withdrawals
- Global standards group highlights silliness of GAC’s IGO demands
- Massive internet policy database planned in Europe
- URS providers to get contracts
- Kiss-of-death gTLD applicant asks ICANN to reject “untimely” GAC advice
- TLDH weighs in on “terrifying” GAC advice
- Second .online gTLD bid and third ‘guardian’ dot-brand withdrawn
- New gTLDs applicants should brace for GAC delays
- 56 more new gTLDs pass evaluation
- Will you be too sexy for .sexy?
- This is how stupid the GAC’s new gTLDs advice is
- Demand Media slates GAC’s new gTLDs demands
ICANN gives Verisign’s .com contract the nod
ICANN’s board of directors has approved Verisign’s .com registry agreement for another six years.
In a closed meeting on Saturday, the results of which have just been published, the board decided against making any of the changes that had been suggested by the community.
There had been a small uproar over the fact that Verisign will retain the right to increase its .com registry fee by 7% in four out of the next seven years.
The new contract also rejiggers the fees Verisign pays ICANN to bring them more into line with other registry agreements. As a result, ICANN will net millions more in revenue.
Other parties had also asked for improved rights protection, such as a mandatory Uniform Rapid Suspension system, and for the current restrictions on single-character domain names to be lifted.
But the board decided that “no revisions to the proposed .COM renewal Registry Agreement are necessitated after taking into account the thoughtful and carefully considered comments received.”
The agreement will now be forward to the US government for approval. Unlike most registry contracts, the Department of Commerce has the right to review the .com deal.
The current contract expires November 30.
Recent Comments
To my knowledge, Fly9 is the only provider that enables multiple registrars, resellers and affiliates for a given TLD on... read more
GMO Registry probably got their CQS for .Tokyo (priority number 199) circa January 31, which would make their deadline e... read more
@Hiro Tsukahara: Please email me your direct email contact to marekgubala[at]email.cz, as I would like to send you so... read more
Hi Kevin, Let me clarify this -- GMO Registry hasn’t flunked any of its applications. Our IE results have simply been... read more
Tucows, Hexonet and TLD Registrar Solutions goes pretty much in the same direction as well.... read more
Anonymous, above, is correct that I cannot look at staff issues as these are excluded under my bylaw. It says, "the Ombu... read more
According to ICANN's Bylaws: "... the Ombudsman shall have no authority to act in any way with respect to internal admin... read more
I agree something the ombudsman should look into. However I will say sometimes leaders come into new companies and ne... read more
Then they should have withdrawn from the process as soon the risk of failing the evaluation was clear, like when they re... read more
If I were McKinsey I wouldn't want to disclose those financials, either. It's one of the places where the process wasn't... read more