Recent Posts
- MMX makes $100,000 .luxe premium sale
- Major registries posting “fabricated” Whois data
- Hold your horses! The last wave of comments on .amazon hasn’t started yet
- .com zone tops 140 million
- .gay picks the absolutely perfect launch date
- Dot-brand .bond has been acquired and will relaunch as a generic this July
- CentralNic grabs more of the reseller market with $16.5 million acquisition
- EURid inks trademark protection deal for non-trademark owners
- CENTR: domain growth now slowest EVER
- Court rules domain name list should stay secret
- ICANN redacts the secrets of Verisign’s .web deal
- Got a spare three grand? For a limited period, you can buy a .th domain name
- Amazon wins! ICANN on verge of approving .amazon despite government outrage
- WordPress-linked .blog dumps Nominet for CentralNic
- Brand-blocking service plotted for porn gTLDs
- Five more gTLD deadbeats fingered by ICANN
- Defunct Famous Four ordered to hand $1.5 million back to investors
- Future of .io domains has become party-political issue in the UK
- ICANN to host first-ever high-stakes dot-brand auction
- Dead dot-brands hit 50
- Turkish government takes over ccTLD
- Pricey .inc does quite well in sunrise
- ICANN plans return to Cancun in 2021
- These five TLDs contain 80% of all child abuse images
- PIR says it has no plans to raise .org prices
- .CLUB to let brands block “trillions” of domains for $2,000
- Another five Amazon TLDs move to Nominet
- Non-coms say .org price cap should be RAISED
- Dot-brand early adopter becomes 48th to disappear
- Donuts acquires its 242nd gTLD
- Non-profits worth $2.6 billion a year say .org price caps should stay
- Governments demand Whois reopened within a year
- These people support scrapping .org price caps
- .org price anger comments top 3,000 as non-profits weigh in
- ICA rallies the troops to defeat .org price hikes. It won’t work
- Karklins beats LaHatte to chair ICANN’s Whois privacy team
- ICANN to approve new UDRP provider
- Amazon tells power-hungry governments to get stuffed
- Oh, the irony! Banned anti-Islam activist shows up on “Turkish” new gTLD domain
- ICANN got hacked by crypto bots
- Revenue dips as Brexit whacks .eu in 2018
- auDA rejects domaining ban but approves second-level domains
- KPMG dumps .com for dot-brand gTLD
- David and Goliath? DotMusic confirms .music win
- Neustar loses most of its Amazon back-end biz to Nominet
- ICANN takes the reins again as .amazon talks fail
- Italian bank is the latest dot-brand to bow out
- .music update: I’m calling it for Costa
- ICA opposes Aussie domaining ban
- “Just give up!” ICANN tells its most stubborn new gTLD applicant
ICANN blocks almost 10 million new gTLD domains
ICANN has asked new gTLD registry operators to block a total of 9.8 million domain names, due to the perceived risk of damage from name collisions.
To put it another way, Verisign has managed to take close to 10 million domain names off the market.
ICANN today delivered second-level domain block-lists for 1,327 new gTLDs. Combined, the number of unique blocked domains is just over 9.8 million, according to DI’s preliminary analysis.
Some of the lists relate to gTLDs that will not be approved because they’re in mutually exclusive contention sets with other strings (for example, .unicorn and .unicom).
Twenty-five unfortunate gTLD applicants did not receive lists, because ICANN said they do not qualify for the block-list-based “Alternate Path to Delegation”.
We’re currently crunching the numbers and will have more information later today, with a bit of luck.
When will ICANN publish the process for applicants that don’t want to participate in the APD? How much of a delay are strings that won’t take the APD are looking at?
Not sure. First quarter 2014 would be my guess.
Q1 2014 is what is foreseen for the framework. Although Francisco Arias said it will be quick to apply the framework to get actual mitigation plans, considering there are more than 1,000 uncontested TLDs and this number is growing due to private auctions and settlements, I would be conservative and guessing at least a month for going from the framework to the ~1,400 mitigation plans.
I find the blocking of visually similar TLDs ridiculous. So according to your unicorn/unicom example, is .corn blocked too, because it can be confused somehow for .com? If one is visually impaired, they should be using text to voice software, eliminating this ridiculous ‘confusion’.
Yeah, I’m pretty certain that .corn would be banned based on the .unicorn/.unicom decision. I wouldn’t risk the application fee, anyway.
so.. having reviewed the list for our applied for string, tickets, the list of 1847 blocked SLDs has to be some kind of joke. as expected a lot of the names are simply search terms that the search function in the browser added a dot to… congratulations verisign #slowclap