Recent Posts
- ICANN handover in jeopardy as Texas leads lawsuit against US government
- Squabbling drug peddlers drag .pharmacy into brand bunfight
- For $10,000, Donuts will block hundreds of typos and premiums for your brand
- Over 50,000 names sold as .shop has successful launch day
- GoDaddy spearheads Domain Connect spec
- “UDRP-proof” .feedback gTLD loses first UDRP
- CIRA becomes first new gTLD back-end since 2012
- People are forgetting .com exists — ICANN survey
- Famous Four VP goes solo, claims $400,000 sale
- Watch: Hollywood actors trash Trump, promote .vote
- Could ICANN reject Verisign’s $135m .web bid?
- Chinese investor pumps $7 million into M+M as .vip pushes firm into profit
- Barcelona picked for ICANN 63
- Destroy ICANN! Destroy ICANN with missiles!
- Uniregistry to release 10 million domains on October 4
- .blog gets 600 applications halfway through sunrise
- Verisign data shows new gTLDs drive almost three quarters of Q2 growth
- Customers revolt as GoDaddy buys WordPress tools outfit
- First dot-brand gTLD to go generic after TLS deal
- Correction: what NTIA said about .com pricing
- Relaunch and slashed prices for .whoswho after terrible sales
- US claims option to delay IANA transition as Cruz launches free speech doomsday clock
- .trust gTLD might be for sale as NCC closes domain business
- Tata ponders “buy a school” strategy to release .tata from limbo
- .hotel losers gang up to threaten ICANN with legal bills
- Are .mail, .home and .corp safe to launch? Applicants think so
- Dot Registry backs .africa loser, batters on the ICANN lawsuit floodgates
- West.cn targets Engrish domainers with new .xyz site
- Spurned applicant crowd-funding to fight ICANN for .gay gTLD
- Confused by new gTLDs? Allow this Nominet infographic to make your brain explode
- Registries rebel against ICANN’s Whois upgrade decree
- NamesCon confirms three more shows after being acquired
- Afilias set to get .hotel despite hacking claims
- “Dave” becomes first .blog blogger
- Registrar CEO faces terrorism charges
- Industry lays into Verisign over .com deal renewal
- ICANN lawyers slam “fire him” story “blogger”
- Next new gTLD round could start sooner than expected
- Centuries-old companies both fail community gTLD test
- Afilias buys three gTLDs from Starting Dot
- Donuts rolls the dice with $22.5 million .web lawsuit
- IRP panel crucifies ICANN for lack of transparency
- L’Oreal shows cards on former “closed generic” gTLDs
- Verisign confirms it did fund $135 million .web bid
- Ombudsman trashes ICANN’s rejection of .gay “community”
- Verisign likely $135 million winner of .web gTLD
- Verisign announces .net price increase
- .web could already be a record-breaker as auction enters day two
- M+M billings quadruple on China .vip surge
- “Ditch .com!” government to tell Indians
ICANN blocks almost 10 million new gTLD domains
ICANN has asked new gTLD registry operators to block a total of 9.8 million domain names, due to the perceived risk of damage from name collisions.
To put it another way, Verisign has managed to take close to 10 million domain names off the market.
ICANN today delivered second-level domain block-lists for 1,327 new gTLDs. Combined, the number of unique blocked domains is just over 9.8 million, according to DI’s preliminary analysis.
Some of the lists relate to gTLDs that will not be approved because they’re in mutually exclusive contention sets with other strings (for example, .unicorn and .unicom).
Twenty-five unfortunate gTLD applicants did not receive lists, because ICANN said they do not qualify for the block-list-based “Alternate Path to Delegation”.
We’re currently crunching the numbers and will have more information later today, with a bit of luck.
When will ICANN publish the process for applicants that don’t want to participate in the APD? How much of a delay are strings that won’t take the APD are looking at?
Not sure. First quarter 2014 would be my guess.
Q1 2014 is what is foreseen for the framework. Although Francisco Arias said it will be quick to apply the framework to get actual mitigation plans, considering there are more than 1,000 uncontested TLDs and this number is growing due to private auctions and settlements, I would be conservative and guessing at least a month for going from the framework to the ~1,400 mitigation plans.
I find the blocking of visually similar TLDs ridiculous. So according to your unicorn/unicom example, is .corn blocked too, because it can be confused somehow for .com? If one is visually impaired, they should be using text to voice software, eliminating this ridiculous ‘confusion’.
Yeah, I’m pretty certain that .corn would be banned based on the .unicorn/.unicom decision. I wouldn’t risk the application fee, anyway.
so.. having reviewed the list for our applied for string, tickets, the list of 1847 blocked SLDs has to be some kind of joke. as expected a lot of the names are simply search terms that the search function in the browser added a dot to… congratulations verisign #slowclap