US could change .com pricing terms
The US government and Verisign are to enter talks about possible changes to .com pricing.
The National Telecommunications and Information Administration has told the company that it “intends to renew its Agreement with Verisign” but said it welcomed Verisign agreeing to talks that “may include an amendment to the pricing terms”.
The news came in an exchange of letters between NTIA assistant secretary Alan Davidson and Verisign chief Jim Bidzos over the weekend, published last night. Davidson wrote:
NTIA has questions related to pricing in the .com market. We are therefore pleased that Verisign has agreed to discussions regarding .com pricing and the health of the .com ecosystem, including retail and secondary markets. The parties will discuss possible solutions that benefit end-users, both businesses and consumers, and serve the public interest
The Cooperative Agreement between NTIA and Verisign gives the company the right to raise prices by 7% in four of the six years of its term, all of which Verisign exercised in the current run, which ends in a couple months.
The price-rising powers were frozen under Obama administration but reinstated under Trump, giving Verisign masses of extra revenue and huge profit margins, even as .com volume numbers took a prolonged dive.
NTIA’s intervention follows letters from three campaign groups calling .com a “cartel” and inquiries from three Congresspeople.
In response to NTIA’s letter, Bidzos wrote:
We have observed that our capped .com price increases have not always been passed through to benefit end-users and therefore we welcome an opportunity to have this important discussion. We are prepared to consider structures to address this and other issues, including ways to make .com pricing more predictable for the channel as part of it.
It’s clear from this rather tense exchange that the two parties might not exactly see eye-to-eye on their desired outcomes.
Verisign’s position recently has been that .com volumes have been falling in large part because of what Bidzos called the “unregulated retail channel” pumping up prices to increase profit-per-domain over domains under management.
He also pointed out in the company’s most-recent quarterly earnings call that the average price of .coms on the secondary market is $1,600, or 166x the wholesale price.
As some have pointed out, Verisign complaining about profiteering in the channel is the height of chutzpah, given its own mouth-watering margins, which appear to be what it seeks to protect more than anything else.
If Verisign reckons the registrar business is so great, why hasn’t it launched a registrar of its own yet? The company has been legally permitted by the Cooperative Agreement and its ICANN contract to do so for years.
If you find this post or this blog useful or interestjng, please support Domain Incite, the independent source of news, analysis and opinion for the domain name industry and ICANN community.
Recent Comments