Recent Posts
- Porn.com owner buys porn.xxx
- Is the .home new gTLD doomed? ICANN poses study of security risks
- Blow to domainers as Arab center approved to settle cybersquatting disputes
- No Las Vegas, alas. ICANN picks LA for 2014 meeting
- Directi gets into the subdomain game
- Did GMO flunk evaluation on 27 gTLDs? CentralNic takes over the whole lot
- Fly9 offers services to simplify new gTLD sales
- Two failures among latest 44 new gTLD results
- Donuts puts 63 new gTLDs to private auction, but at least 17 are dead on arrival
- ‘Whistleblower’ claims cronyism and fear at ICANN
- Donuts hires the face of the new gTLD program
- Ombudsman probing “late” new gTLD objections
- Healthcare dot-brand drops out of gTLD race
- Afilias dumps .mail bid, and three other new gTLD withdrawals
- Global standards group highlights silliness of GAC’s IGO demands
- Massive internet policy database planned in Europe
- URS providers to get contracts
- Kiss-of-death gTLD applicant asks ICANN to reject “untimely” GAC advice
- TLDH weighs in on “terrifying” GAC advice
- Second .online gTLD bid and third ‘guardian’ dot-brand withdrawn
Verisign raises .name prices
Verisign plans to add 10% to the price of a .name domain name, judging by published correspondence.
In a price list sent to ICANN last week, the maximum registry fee for a one-year registration at the second level in .name will be set at $6.60 from August 1, 2013.
It appears to be the first such price increase in .name since the current registry contract was signed back in 2007. That contract set the fee at $6, with maximum hikes of 10% a year.
The new price list (pdf) is rather extensive, also covering products such as email forwarding and .name’s rather expensive wildcard-based defensive registrations.
Links to Verisign’s current pricing for these services are currently broken, so I can’t tell right now whether they’re going up, down, or staying the same.
It’s the second price increase Verisign has announced since it lost the right to hike the registry fee for .com last year. It is also raising .net prices later this year.
Recent Comments
It's only a 3 hour drive to Las Vegas from there. :)... read more
Agree with Sad Sally . This is going to just add to the injustices served up by WIPO ,but worse. Look can we please do ... read more
I'll just file a lawsuit every time it goes to them, especially since I'm not a trademark buyer and will fight to the bi... read more
This should not be a surprise to anyone. .home and .corp were explicitly on the list of most popular invalid new TLDs as... read more
Well Genzco has always make sure customers are using real name to register... Domain names are big business and is alway... read more
http://www.thedomains.com/2013/05/20/did-google-just-kill-off-selling-subdomains/... read more
.Tokyo results were never announced, so ICANN don't have to retract them, but it is indeed a material change to applicat... read more
Hmmm is this interesting! Wonder if this signifies the strings they are okay losing for a larger pot of gold to secure ... read more
Interesting point about .tokyo Ruben. So this makes me wonder if a re-evaluation is necessary as this appears to be a m... read more
"Multiple registrars, resellers and affiliates" => check on both Tucows and Logic Boxes. I'll ask Fly9 for a services... read more