Latest news of the domain name industry

Recent Posts

Delays still dog many new gTLD applicants

Kevin Murphy, March 3, 2014, 11:51:47 (UTC), Domain Policy

With dozens of new gTLDs currently live and on sale, it’s easy to forget that many applicants are still in ICANN limbo due to several still-unresolved issues with the evaluation process.

The New gTLD Applicant Group wrote to ICANN on Friday to express many of these concerns.

First, NTAG is upset that resolution of the name collisions issue is not moving as fast as hoped.

JAS Advisors published its report into collisions, which recommends “controlled interruption” as a solution, last Thursday. But it’s currently open for public comment until April 21.

That would push approval of the plan by ICANN’s board beyond the Singapore meeting taking place at the end of March, at least a month later than originally expected.

NTAG secretary Andrew Merriam argues that the 42-day comment period should be reduced to 21 days, with ICANN and JAS conducting webinars this week to discuss the proposal with applicants.

Second, NTAG is upset that ICANN has pushed out the start date for the first contention set auctions from March to June. It’s asking ICANN to promise that there will be no further delays.

Third, NTAG says that many dot-brands are unable to enter into contracting talks with ICANN until Specification 13 of the Registry Agreement, which contains opt-outs for single-registrant zones, is finalized.

That’s not currently expected to happen until Singapore, apparently because there were no scheduled meetings of the ICANN board’s New gTLD Program Committee until then.

NTAG also complains about the length of time it’s taking to decide the first Community Priority Evaluations, which is apparently due to quality assurance measures (very wise given the controversy caused by the lack of oversight on new gTLD objections, if you ask me).

The NGPC has a newly scheduled meeting this Wednesday, with new gTLDs on the agenda, but it’s not yet clear whether any of NTAG’s issues are going to be addressed.

Tagged: , , , , ,

Comments (2)

  1. Drewbert says:

    Add the Verisign/PIR .com/.org IDN transliterations to the “in limbo” list.

    • Rubens Kuhl says:

      Due to Verisign’s own decision. Their start-up policy contains mechanisms that are not foreseen in the program (grandfathering), and they are taking it slow with ICANN to get this program approved, I guess.

      Considering that all other launch programs that were submitted ended with the registries withdrawing it due to ICANN not timely answering them, Verisign IDNs will likely a very long time to come about.

Add Your Comment