Recent Posts
- Top-level reshuffle as ICANN loses its COO
- Amazon finally gets its dot-brands despite last-minute government plea
- South Africa might raise, or lower, some wholesale domain fees
- Verisign says its coronavirus fee waivers have saved businesses millions
- Industry growth driven by new gTLD(s) in Q1
- World’s youngest country launches its Nazi-risk TLD next week
- Is ICANN chickening out of Whois access role?
- Irony alert! Data protection agency complains it can’t get access to private Whois data
- ICANN dissenter explains why she wanted .org sale approved
- CSC removes reference to “retiring” new gTLD domain after retiring new gTLD domain
- Google launches .meet gTLD after Meet service goes free during lockdown
- Aussie ccTLD surges under coronavirus lockdown
- Spring Break redux! ICANN picks Cancun for 2023 meeting
- ICANN’s .org decision was NOT unanimous, and it was made in secret
- Donuts kicks down .place fences after attempt at innovation
- .org sale officially dead
- Afilias promotes .vote domains amid US vote-by-mail controversy
- After Zoom trolling, ICANN 68 will be password-protected
- Despite Brexit, .eu actually returned to growth in Q1
- ICANN whistleblower expects to be fired after alleging budget irregularities, bugged meetings
- Portugal ccTLD says growth better than expected during pandemic
- The .org deal may be dead and buried, but calls remain for PIR to lose its contract
- “Dangerous precedent” as ICANN rejects $1.13 billion .org buyout
- ICANN may scrap its $0.18 reg tax in coronavirus “solidarity”
- Domain industry likely to suffer from coronavirus as ICANN slashes budget by 8%
- Decision on .org deal may come sooner than you think
- ICANN meeting got “Zoombombed” with offensive material
- CentralNic does not expect big coronavirus impact as it posts almost-doubled revenue for 2019
- Verisign expects to sell fewer domains because of coronavirus
- Coronavirus lockdown is working out great for at least one registry
- Coronavirus could cause “high risk of widespread outages”, ICANN says
- Free domains registrar gets FOURTH breach notice
- Four more dot-brands join the gTLD deadpool
- As ICANN meets to decide .org’s fate, California AG says billion-dollar deal must be rejected
- Whois privacy talks in Bizarro World as governments and trademark owners urge coronavirus delay
- GoDaddy signs up 30 partners to lockdown-era marketing scheme
- Kuala Lumpur meeting cancelled and ICANN 68 could be even trickier online
- Five SAFE ways to buy and sell domains during the coronavirus pandemic
- To show new focus on registry, Uniregistry dumps “registry” from its brand. Um…
- No ICANN tax relief for Chinese registrars
- ICANN declares coronavirus a “natural disaster” to protect expired domains
- Ethos clarifies .org price rises, promises to reveal number of censored domains
- End of the road for Neustar as GoDaddy U-turns again and buys out its registry biz
- ICANN to consider cancelling ICANN 68 tomorrow
- Coronavirus: more delay and free domains for .gay
- CentralNic seeing no impact from coronavirus
- ICANN expects “significant” budget impact from coronavirus
- ICANN’s number two Cyrus Namazi quits. Probably due to sexual discrimination claims.
- ICANN grants Verisign its price increases, of course
- ALL .za domains have to link to government coronavirus web site
- Namecheap and others banning coronavirus domains
- Go here to help fight against coronavirus abuse
- As it releases free download, DomainTools says 68,000 dangerous coronavirus domains have been registered
- No .com price increases this year. Thanks, coronavirus!
- US officials gunning for coronavirus domains
- Nominet to intercept dangerous coronavirus domains
- An open question to the domain name industry about coronavirus
- US senators tell ICANN to reject .org deal
- More ICANN events cancelled for May
- More domain industry response to coronavirus
- .org decision delayed another month
- Delay .org deal because of… coronavirus? Gimme a break
- Not every coronavirus domain registrant is a douchebag
- Roundup: domain industry starts to respond to coronavirus pandemic
- At ICANN 67, nobody knew you’re a dog
- GoDaddy cancels in-person investor day over coronavirus fears
- WE’RE ALL GONNA DIE! In other news, ICANN 67 was… “muted”
- Facebook WILL sue more registrars for cybersquatting
- ICANN chair: “all options open” on .org deal
- Could .org debate bring back the glory days of ICANN public forums?
- The latest industry C-suite musical chairs
- Poblete to replace Disspain on ICANN board
- Chinese registrars ask ICANN to waive fees due to Coronavirus
- Most languages won’t be available at ICANN 67
- Domain Incite turns 10 today. What the fuck have I done with my life?
- Ethos volunteers for .org pricing handcuffs
- Yup. ICANN cancelled Cancun
- The Queen has beef with Prince Harry’s domain name
- ICANN wants to take your temperature before letting you into ICANN 67
- ICANN might cancel Spring Break over Covid-19 fears
- Verisign shits on domainers, again
- 9,000 people tell ICANN they don’t want .com price increases. Here’s what some of them said
- Covid-19: It’s official, domainers are faster than journalists
- ICA will help you support .com price increases (but doesn’t want you to)
- .gay hires pop star equality campaigner as spokesperson
- Watch: climate change denier on why she trusts .org more than .com
- Ethos’ .org pricing promise may be misleading
- Hacking claims resurface as .hotel losers force ICANN to lawyer up again
- ICANN refuses to release more info on .org deal
- Possibly the strangest new gTLD acquisition yet
- California .org probe — existential crisis or blessed relief for ICANN?
- As Cancun looms, ICANN bans China travel because of Coronavirus
- XYZ expands gTLD stable as L’Oreal exits the domain game
- Is the .co rebid biased toward Afilias? Yeah, kinda
- Amazon governments vow revenge for “illegal and unjust” ICANN decision on .amazon
- SaveDotOrg to protest outside ICANN HQ. #lol
- Ten years ago I predicted Oscar winners wanted a .movie gTLD. Was I right?
- ICANN gets a new European chief
- New CEO to step into the lion’s den at auDA
- Secrets of the .org deal revealed, but much info remains private
- Registrar terminated after what looks like domain hijacking
- NamesCon publishes full agenda for debut Austin conference
- .gay prices and availability revealed as registry promises to give 20% of revenue to charity
- Now .org critics actually want to take over the registry, blocking billion-dollar sale
- Verisign pays ICANN $20 million and gets to raise .com prices again
- ICANN predicts shrinkage in new gTLD sector
- ASO uses super powers to demand ICANN turn over .org buyout docs
- Now PIR rubbishes .org “downtime” claims
- DI Leaders Roundtable #4 — Big predictions for 2020
- Afilias denies .org will go down post-acquisition
- Palestine to release all one-character .ps domains, at a price
- PIR thinks 20-year domain regs are a good idea
- Amazon beats South America! Dot-brand contracts now signed
- Q3 industry growth driven by .tk, .com and .icu
- ICANN throws out second .org appeal, so URS stays
- Warning (or threat?) prices must go up or .org will suffer DAYS of downtime
- Russian company approved as gTLD escrow provider
- Guy gets 14 years for trying to steal a domain with a gun
- GoDaddy girls often make more money than the men
- Non-coms want .org’s future carved in stone
- Kamel’s deputy gets promoted at ICANN
- ICANN delays approval of .org acquisition
- AlpNames died months ago. Why is it still the “most-abused” registrar?
- Ethos promises to keep .org for many many many many years
- Amid .org controversy, Cerf predicts the death of all domains
Schilling: registries could wind-down unprofitable gTLDs
Kevin Murphy,
December 4, 2015, 16:59:00 (UTC),
Domain Registries
New gTLD portfolio registries may one day decide to wind down some of their gTLDs if they fail to reach profitability.
That’s according to Uniregistry CEO Frank Schilling, who told DI today that registries may “sunset” under-performing TLDs.
His comments came in response to our post earlier today about registries going out of business involuntarily due to lack of sales.
But he’s referring to registries managing large numbers of strings, winding down the unprofitable ones in a controlled manner.
“I can’t see Uniregistry doing that today, but if in round two we get 100 strings that all kill it and we have some round one stuff that sucks, yes,” he said in an email. “I would consider raising prices to get the string profitable or sunset the string.”
“That said,” he added, “that’s 5-8 years out [and] by then even the slowest should be profitable.”
This is a warning to the new registries to begin dropping their prices on premiums.
The only way for the new g’s to get their legs is for users to mass adopt them.
It’s just that simple.
Surely dropping premium prices is more likely to encourage speculation by domainers who will just mark up the resale price to somewhere in the region of what the registry was originally selling them for.
That’s true, but some registries could use the cash in hand early on to fund future operations.
I wouldn’t argue with that, but I don’t think that’s what Jen was getting at.
Domainers are the unpaid, outsourced sales representatives of the registries.
Even if the retail price remains the same, a large group of domainers might distribute domains to end users more successfully than the registry could on its own.
Jen , that is the last thing they should do .Individual TLDs need to maximise, skillfully manage their one off premium names list in the first couple of years , which can contribute towards the global marketing effort to achieve critical mass. The general market is already saturated with reg prices inevitably being driven down to a non viable $1 and then 80% + are parked.. ICANN should never have allowed a flooding of the market, but should have phased in TLDs gradually over years.
too late, Jen.
The die is cast.
People scalded by the pathetic adoption that already blew their wad will decide/have decided not to renew based on anemic secondary sale results.
.xyz probably is the exception to this buit .nyc, .london, guru, .garbage….etc….
its too late,..they blew it !
they will need to drop registration to .click, .link, .xyz levels [$5]…..and renewals at $8 before people dip their toes in again,….
and even than,..like I said,…
the die is cast.
$1 domains, .science etc… who is going to pay to renew these dogs. We own some premium GTLD’s in good extensions, we are seeing ZERO, ZILCH, 0 offers across the board.
This is not an investment
The reason the .com aftermarket works so well:
A buyer might be willing to pay a premium for a domain, but renewals will be cheap.
No one wants to pay X,XXX – XX,XXX every year.
The new registrars have yet to learn this.
A domainer certainly doesn’t want to pay a high renewal fee on a domain that has yet to make them any revenue.
A user would surely be much more likely to be comfortable with that arrangement.
I don’t see too many end users lining up for the new G’s.
Loads of people have set up web sites using new gTLDs.
I would go so far as to say outside of defensive reg’s the market is mostly individuals for new gTLDs.
Also, please note when I said above .xyz probalby is the exception I meant MAYBE. That is, there is a shot of a secondary market MAYBE developing.
Truth is, without a secondary market these new Gtld domains suck badly.
Could this possibly be an exit route for Franks Premeditated plans?
Frank Schilling is an extraordinary Carpetbagging Huckster !
Frank is a master at taking your money and convincing you that the loss was your fault. He has the little unsuspecting Newbie Domainers thinking he is a champion of the little guy. He portrays himself as a friend to small-time investors even as he picks their pockets clean. Beware the New GTLD scam, soon to be exposed. Frank cannot escape the coming realities that will effect his GTLDs. Just a friendly Warning JAS 12/4/15
Gratefully, Jeff Schneider (Contact Group) (Metal Tiger) (Former Rockefeller IBEC Marketing Analyst/Strategist) (Licensed CBOE Commodity Hedge Strategist) http://www.UseBiz.com
Is this your personal opinion, Jeff? Or do you speak on behalf of all members of Contact Group and Metal Tiger?
Hello Kevin,
This is our Groups Opinion, and our groups opinions are all well documented over at RicsBlog.com in Historical Archives. Anyone who wants the truth can read our Contact Groups Strategic opinions, Warning if you cannot handle the truth dont go there.
Gratefully, Jeff Schneider (Contact Group) (Metal Tiger) (Former Rockefeller IBEC Marketing Analyst/Strategist) (Licensed CBOE Commodity Hedge Strategist) http://www.UseBiz.com
MISPELL ( should be http://www.RicksBlog.com )
Gratefully, Jeff Schneider (Contact Group) (Metal Tiger) (Former Rockefeller IBEC Marketing Analyst/Strategist) (Licensed CBOE Commodity Hedge Strategist) http://www.UseBiz.com
Sadly, I can’t handle the truth, so I won’t be going there.
Suit yourself, just thought for your readerships sake you would like to be truly informative, and truthfull ??
Gratefully, Jeff Schneider (Contact Group) (Metal Tiger) (Former Rockefeller IBEC Marketing Analyst/Strategist) (Licensed CBOE Commodity Hedge Strategist) http://www.UseBiz.com
Off your Meds again Jeff?
No one takes domain advice off a guy with the worlds worst website. Its like the html ramblings of a paranoid schizophrenic.
Everybody needs to understand that the regs behind the new GTLDs always knew that if their GTLDs failed they had the perfect out that this was all an ICANN legit opration. Mean while they scuury off into the bushes with all their ill begotton initial profits. Yes the perfect SCAM.
Gratefully, Jeff Schneider (Contact Group) (Metal Tiger) (Former Rockefeller IBEC Marketing Analyst/Strategist) (Licensed CBOE Commodity Hedge Strategist) http://www.UseBiz.com
Donuts will not sunset or shutter any of our TLDs, and are skeptical of speculation about this kind of “market.” From our perspective, a portfolio approach brings stability to this equation, thanks to efficiencies and lower relative costs.
Our company is highly profitable even though we have some TLDs with fewer names. Specific TLDs, such as “.bank”, for example can command higher prices than can generic TLDs, and perhaps are therefore more profitable per name than TLDs with larger volume. We speculate that some TLDs with high volume are losing money, while some with low volume are very profitable. At best there is no correlation between volume and profitability as the report supposes.
It’s important to point out that even if a TLD fails financially, ICANN has procedures in place to ensure it doesn’t go suddenly dark (e.g., the emergency back-end system, and cash / letters of credit on deposit with ICANN). There’s little to be concerned about on this front. In fact, ICANN has backup systems in place that are more extensive than what exists for registrars that go dark (which happens fairly frequently), and even those instances leave no damage to end users.
Regardless, we’re seeing accelerating growth in new gTLD registrations — now surging past 10 million.
The Google-Centric Ad companies are supporting the new GTLDs as the superior Marketing Strategy. This osolesced Google-Centric strategy will sink many new Net denizens new launch aspirations. The mere fact that the New GTLD operators have this cavalier attitude that fragile new Online business’s should not be alarmed if their businesses should go dark with a shallow assuring (Trust Us its a minor issue )??
The Brand Damage this would cause is not minor but a major Online Marketing Strategy Misfire that can be avoided by using an already established extensions credibility and employing a subdomain that incorporates the new GTLDs characteristics. This is what a really smart Marketing Strategist would choose.
Sorry Donuts your arguments are filled with holes. JAS 12/4/15
Gratefully, Jeff Schneider (Contact Group) (Metal Tiger) (Former Rockefeller IBEC Marketing Analyst/Strategist) (Licensed CBOE Commodity Hedge Strategist) http://www.UseBiz.com
I would see risks associated with single registries trying to run it on their own, but as you said I would have a hard time seeing that model work in the long term, I think that the most profitable and stable future for nGTLDS is going to be in portfolio style business plans.
This is actually pretty humorous to me.
I had my ideas as to how this market would be created and play out in 1995 when I proposed .Web to Postel and crew. And then in the formation of ICANN, making all the rules, the round in 2000, the sTLD round, and now this round.
Anyone who cares to go read the transcripts will see that I was, for the most part, completely right. Go re-read our original proposal for .Web, the plans we had, and the possible pivots. Compare that to today. I say this not as an ego stroke, but as a nod that it was as obvious then as it is obvious now.
How this all is playing out, and how the next ten years will play out seems, to me, like a script I have on my desk. I’ve seen this movie and its ending.
The winners and losers have already been decided.
Or, as I like to say, nobody goes to see a Shakespeare play to find out how it ends.
Oh pray tell, Christopher Ambler give us a link like we did so we can check out your Efficacy, RicksBlog.com is quite different than anything you may show us all. RicksBlog.com is the Domaining Industry TIME STAMPED past information Gold Mine, we showed you our back up whats yours?
Gratefully, Jeff Schneider (Contact Group) (Metal Tiger) (Former Rockefeller IBEC Marketing Analyst/Strategist) (Licensed CBOE Commodity Hedge Strategist) http://www.UseBiz.com
Jeff, if you don’t know the history, I’m not here to educate you. Please feel free to believe whatever you wish, and I wish you luck in your endeavors.
Hello Christopher Ambler,
We not only know domaining History, we also helped create a lot of it. The Contact Group) are all Legacy Domainers.
RicksBlog.com is the Domaining Industry TIME STAMPED past information Gold Mine. For those who are looking for the really smart money Knowledge, RicksBlog.com
Gratefully, Jeff Schneider (Contact Group) (Metal Tiger) (Former Rockefeller IBEC Marketing Analyst/Strategist) (Licensed CBOE Commodity Hedge Strategist) http://www.UseBiz.com
The Google-Centric Ad companies are supporting the new GTLDs as the superior Marketing Strategy. This osolesced Google-Centric strategy will sink many new Net denizens new launch aspirations. The mere fact that the New GTLD operators have this cavalier attitude that fragile new Online business’s should not be alarmed if their businesses should ( GO DARK ) – or Offline with a shallow assuring (Trust Us its a minor issue )??
The Brand Damage this would cause is not minor but a major Online Marketing Strategy Misfire that can be avoided by using an already established extensions credibility (Prefferably the Dominant .COM Traffic Channel URLs, and employing a subdomain that incorporates the new GTLDs characteristics. This is what a really smart Marketing Strategist would choose. Sorry Donuts your arguments are filled with holes. JAS 12/4/15
Gratefully, Jeff Schneider (Contact Group) (Metal Tiger) (Former Rockefeller IBEC Marketing Analyst/Strategist) (Licensed CBOE Commodity Hedge Strategist) http://www.UseBiz.com
!00s of New GTLD sites may ( GO DARK ) – or Offline Read this damaging Report Google hopes you never read. http://internetidentity.com/press-release/iid-predicts-massive-botnet-takeover-of-iot-devices-by-2017/