Recent Posts
- Most registrars did NOT “fail” abuse audit, ICANN says
- Surprise eleventh-hour picks for NomCom leadership after ICANN U-turn
- Man with broken shift key sues ICANN and GoDaddy over Bitcoin domain
- Alice’s Registry disappears down the rabbit hole
- Nominet rebels dominate directorship slate
- 10 Years Ago… new gTLDs, ICANN pay, DNS abuse and ethics
- Nominet to purge £50 million from war chest for good causes as new chair outlines strategy
- .club — the whole TLD just went down
- Donuts’ DropZone approved despite competition fears
- I’m not kidding, ICANN is flirting with banning jokes
- DotConnectAfrica slammed for two-faced strategy as it loses .africa appeal
- PIR poaches new CTO from Verisign
- Marby finds his pandemic pessimism
- James Bond domains listed for sale by .bond registry
- Afnic gets renewed for .fr
- Tucows buys UNR’s registry business as Schilling bows out
- Neustar exec fingered in Trump’s Russian “collusion” probe
- Donuts’ drop-catching service not anti-competitive, ICANN says
- Almost no security researchers asking for Whois records – Tucows
- Price of Whois lookups could rise as ICANN delays reform work
- Cloudflare goes all-in with at-cost domains
- Hold on to your stats! ShortDot gets two gTLDs approved in China
- CentralNic spends $6.5 million on traffic network
- Nothing but losses ahead for MMX
- Afilias appeals .web ruling, Verisign responds with “rigging” claims
- ICANN won’t vote on new gTLDs for another year
- ICANN now has half a billion bucks in the bank after huge pandemic profits
- Dead dot-brands top 100. Here’s the list and breakdown
- I had a stroke
- Volkswagen drives IDN dot-brand off a cliff
- CTO Conrad quits ICANN
- France gets more domain takedown powers
- MMX to return GoDaddy cash to investors
- Could registrars get sued under new Texas abortion law?
- DropCatch raises antitrust concerns about Donuts’ Dropzone proposal
- ICANN could get the ball rolling on next new gTLD round this weekend
- Domain industry SHRINKS again… except of course it doesn’t
- Toilet-maker’s dot-brand gets flushed
- Latest geo-gTLD goes to sunrise
- NameSilo says it’s growing too fast to be acquired
- Most registrars fail ICANN abuse audit
- More privacy headaches? UK to withdraw from GDPR
- Bizarre redactions in Pirate Bay founder’s ICANN registrar ban
- ICANN cuts the weekend from next public meeting
- DotKids signs very weird new gTLD contract
- Dropping domains might get more expensive at Donuts
- .sucks registry probably “connected” to mass cybersquatter, panel rules
- As Kabul falls, Whois could present a danger to ordinary Afghans
- Second-level .au names coming next March with tight deadline
- ICANN director picks for 2021 revealed
- Over 2,000 attendees for ICANN 73?
- .za back-end deal up for grabs
- ICANN spills beans on Marby’s million-dollar payday
- ICANN 73 will be “virtual first”
- Registrars to get more domain takedown powers
- Irish domain sales closely track pandemic restrictions
- MMX drops two registrars
- “Crimes against humanity” claims against Afilias
- Dead dot-brands #92 and #93
- GoDaddy and MMX delay closure of $120 million gTLD deal
- This company had every reason to want a dot-brand, but just killed it off
- Olympics: Australia preemptively blocking Brisbane 2032 regs
- GoDaddy rides another 21 gTLDs into its stable
- CentralNic expects H1 revenue of $174 million
- Domainers at risk as EnCirca takes over deadbeat registrar’s customer base
- Another new gTLD applicant lawyers up on ICANN
- Big names shunned as Nominet names first registrar council members
- As judge freezes assets, is this OnlineNic domain portfolio really worth $70,000?
- Nominet names new chair, slashes exec pay, promises reforms and more boardroom exits
- Facebook’s war on privacy claims first registrar scalp
- GoDaddy welcomes four porn TLDs
- New gTLD buzz is back again as ICA hosts “second round” webinar
- Nope, no Seattle meeting for ICANN
- .org domains could come in seven new languages
- .com and NameSilo fingered as “most-abused” after numbers rocket
- MMX gets nod to sell 22 gTLDs to GoDaddy
- ICANN to hold hybrid meeting in October (not that one)
- Cambodia looking at new registry overseer
- Panel hands .sucks squatter a WIN, but encourages action against the registry
- Three rivals challenge EURid for .eu contract
- Amazon has started using hard-won .amazon
- Will you use SSAD for Whois queries?
- CentralNic gets into artificial intelligence
- “Diversity” warning over ICANN Seattle
- ICANN DOESN’T money-grub in new gTLD contract shocker
- Pirate Bay founder among candidates for Nominet advisory council
- XYZ scraps .tickets rules but won’t lower the price
- EURid scraps residency rules for three countries
- Epik buys DNForum, explores member ownership options
- Nominet throws money at member-chosen charities
- ICANN backtracks on executive pay transparency
- Brexit-hit domains can still be recovered
- Net4 domains now parked after “fraud” ruling
- Pride Month not transformative for .gay
- Schwartz makes deal to sell ass.com for over $6 million
- US Feds seize 33 Iranian news site domains
- Domain firms plan “Trusted Notifier” takedown rules
- Did Harry and Meghan squat the Queen? [clickbait]
- There’s really only one question about the return to face-to-face ICANN meetings
- Registries unveil plan to tackle botnet abuse with mass takedowns
- Next new gTLD round should be less English, says ICANN boss
- Cade and Dammak win ICANN awards
- In two weeks, Brits will lose their .eu domains forever
- ICANN waves off EFF concerns about the Ethos-Donuts deal
- ICANNers itching to get back to face-to-face shindigs
- How awful would ICANN 72 have to be for you to stay at home?
- More non-rules proposed for Whois privacy
- Domain regs dip for second quarter in a row and it’s all China’s fault
- ICANN 71 — now with added bearded men!
- .autos priced waaay below its XYZ rivals
- Barrett to replace Da Silva on ICANN board
- CentralNic trumpets organic growth as its registrars reverse shrinkage
- EURid sells 1,369 Cyrillic names in five years
- Afilias hints at more legal action over .web
- ShortDot plans domain blocking service for brands
- No more acquisitions for Nominet
- Afilias leftovers rebrand as Altanovo
- American Gen Z not interested in ICANN?
- Honey Salt stops responding to .sucks cybersquatting complaints
- .web ruling hands Afilias a chance, Verisign a problem, and ICANN its own ass on a plate
- Verisign hopeful after decision reached in .web gTLD case
- As .spa launches, former partner pisses in the champagne
- ICANN chair reins in new gTLD timeline hopes
- Sav.com buys FIFTY new registrars
- Disclosure: I sold Tucows shares
Schilling: registries could wind-down unprofitable gTLDs
Kevin Murphy,
December 4, 2015, 16:59:00 (UTC),
Domain Registries
New gTLD portfolio registries may one day decide to wind down some of their gTLDs if they fail to reach profitability.
That’s according to Uniregistry CEO Frank Schilling, who told DI today that registries may “sunset” under-performing TLDs.
His comments came in response to our post earlier today about registries going out of business involuntarily due to lack of sales.
But he’s referring to registries managing large numbers of strings, winding down the unprofitable ones in a controlled manner.
“I can’t see Uniregistry doing that today, but if in round two we get 100 strings that all kill it and we have some round one stuff that sucks, yes,” he said in an email. “I would consider raising prices to get the string profitable or sunset the string.”
“That said,” he added, “that’s 5-8 years out [and] by then even the slowest should be profitable.”
This is a warning to the new registries to begin dropping their prices on premiums.
The only way for the new g’s to get their legs is for users to mass adopt them.
It’s just that simple.
Surely dropping premium prices is more likely to encourage speculation by domainers who will just mark up the resale price to somewhere in the region of what the registry was originally selling them for.
That’s true, but some registries could use the cash in hand early on to fund future operations.
I wouldn’t argue with that, but I don’t think that’s what Jen was getting at.
Domainers are the unpaid, outsourced sales representatives of the registries.
Even if the retail price remains the same, a large group of domainers might distribute domains to end users more successfully than the registry could on its own.
Jen , that is the last thing they should do .Individual TLDs need to maximise, skillfully manage their one off premium names list in the first couple of years , which can contribute towards the global marketing effort to achieve critical mass. The general market is already saturated with reg prices inevitably being driven down to a non viable $1 and then 80% + are parked.. ICANN should never have allowed a flooding of the market, but should have phased in TLDs gradually over years.
too late, Jen.
The die is cast.
People scalded by the pathetic adoption that already blew their wad will decide/have decided not to renew based on anemic secondary sale results.
.xyz probably is the exception to this buit .nyc, .london, guru, .garbage….etc….
its too late,..they blew it !
they will need to drop registration to .click, .link, .xyz levels [$5]…..and renewals at $8 before people dip their toes in again,….
and even than,..like I said,…
the die is cast.
$1 domains, .science etc… who is going to pay to renew these dogs. We own some premium GTLD’s in good extensions, we are seeing ZERO, ZILCH, 0 offers across the board.
This is not an investment
The reason the .com aftermarket works so well:
A buyer might be willing to pay a premium for a domain, but renewals will be cheap.
No one wants to pay X,XXX – XX,XXX every year.
The new registrars have yet to learn this.
A domainer certainly doesn’t want to pay a high renewal fee on a domain that has yet to make them any revenue.
A user would surely be much more likely to be comfortable with that arrangement.
I don’t see too many end users lining up for the new G’s.
Loads of people have set up web sites using new gTLDs.
I would go so far as to say outside of defensive reg’s the market is mostly individuals for new gTLDs.
Also, please note when I said above .xyz probalby is the exception I meant MAYBE. That is, there is a shot of a secondary market MAYBE developing.
Truth is, without a secondary market these new Gtld domains suck badly.
Could this possibly be an exit route for Franks Premeditated plans?
Frank Schilling is an extraordinary Carpetbagging Huckster !
Frank is a master at taking your money and convincing you that the loss was your fault. He has the little unsuspecting Newbie Domainers thinking he is a champion of the little guy. He portrays himself as a friend to small-time investors even as he picks their pockets clean. Beware the New GTLD scam, soon to be exposed. Frank cannot escape the coming realities that will effect his GTLDs. Just a friendly Warning JAS 12/4/15
Gratefully, Jeff Schneider (Contact Group) (Metal Tiger) (Former Rockefeller IBEC Marketing Analyst/Strategist) (Licensed CBOE Commodity Hedge Strategist) http://www.UseBiz.com
Is this your personal opinion, Jeff? Or do you speak on behalf of all members of Contact Group and Metal Tiger?
Hello Kevin,
This is our Groups Opinion, and our groups opinions are all well documented over at RicsBlog.com in Historical Archives. Anyone who wants the truth can read our Contact Groups Strategic opinions, Warning if you cannot handle the truth dont go there.
Gratefully, Jeff Schneider (Contact Group) (Metal Tiger) (Former Rockefeller IBEC Marketing Analyst/Strategist) (Licensed CBOE Commodity Hedge Strategist) http://www.UseBiz.com
MISPELL ( should be http://www.RicksBlog.com )
Gratefully, Jeff Schneider (Contact Group) (Metal Tiger) (Former Rockefeller IBEC Marketing Analyst/Strategist) (Licensed CBOE Commodity Hedge Strategist) http://www.UseBiz.com
Sadly, I can’t handle the truth, so I won’t be going there.
Suit yourself, just thought for your readerships sake you would like to be truly informative, and truthfull ??
Gratefully, Jeff Schneider (Contact Group) (Metal Tiger) (Former Rockefeller IBEC Marketing Analyst/Strategist) (Licensed CBOE Commodity Hedge Strategist) http://www.UseBiz.com
Off your Meds again Jeff?
No one takes domain advice off a guy with the worlds worst website. Its like the html ramblings of a paranoid schizophrenic.
Everybody needs to understand that the regs behind the new GTLDs always knew that if their GTLDs failed they had the perfect out that this was all an ICANN legit opration. Mean while they scuury off into the bushes with all their ill begotton initial profits. Yes the perfect SCAM.
Gratefully, Jeff Schneider (Contact Group) (Metal Tiger) (Former Rockefeller IBEC Marketing Analyst/Strategist) (Licensed CBOE Commodity Hedge Strategist) http://www.UseBiz.com
Donuts will not sunset or shutter any of our TLDs, and are skeptical of speculation about this kind of “market.” From our perspective, a portfolio approach brings stability to this equation, thanks to efficiencies and lower relative costs.
Our company is highly profitable even though we have some TLDs with fewer names. Specific TLDs, such as “.bank”, for example can command higher prices than can generic TLDs, and perhaps are therefore more profitable per name than TLDs with larger volume. We speculate that some TLDs with high volume are losing money, while some with low volume are very profitable. At best there is no correlation between volume and profitability as the report supposes.
It’s important to point out that even if a TLD fails financially, ICANN has procedures in place to ensure it doesn’t go suddenly dark (e.g., the emergency back-end system, and cash / letters of credit on deposit with ICANN). There’s little to be concerned about on this front. In fact, ICANN has backup systems in place that are more extensive than what exists for registrars that go dark (which happens fairly frequently), and even those instances leave no damage to end users.
Regardless, we’re seeing accelerating growth in new gTLD registrations — now surging past 10 million.
The Google-Centric Ad companies are supporting the new GTLDs as the superior Marketing Strategy. This osolesced Google-Centric strategy will sink many new Net denizens new launch aspirations. The mere fact that the New GTLD operators have this cavalier attitude that fragile new Online business’s should not be alarmed if their businesses should go dark with a shallow assuring (Trust Us its a minor issue )??
The Brand Damage this would cause is not minor but a major Online Marketing Strategy Misfire that can be avoided by using an already established extensions credibility and employing a subdomain that incorporates the new GTLDs characteristics. This is what a really smart Marketing Strategist would choose.
Sorry Donuts your arguments are filled with holes. JAS 12/4/15
Gratefully, Jeff Schneider (Contact Group) (Metal Tiger) (Former Rockefeller IBEC Marketing Analyst/Strategist) (Licensed CBOE Commodity Hedge Strategist) http://www.UseBiz.com
I would see risks associated with single registries trying to run it on their own, but as you said I would have a hard time seeing that model work in the long term, I think that the most profitable and stable future for nGTLDS is going to be in portfolio style business plans.
This is actually pretty humorous to me.
I had my ideas as to how this market would be created and play out in 1995 when I proposed .Web to Postel and crew. And then in the formation of ICANN, making all the rules, the round in 2000, the sTLD round, and now this round.
Anyone who cares to go read the transcripts will see that I was, for the most part, completely right. Go re-read our original proposal for .Web, the plans we had, and the possible pivots. Compare that to today. I say this not as an ego stroke, but as a nod that it was as obvious then as it is obvious now.
How this all is playing out, and how the next ten years will play out seems, to me, like a script I have on my desk. I’ve seen this movie and its ending.
The winners and losers have already been decided.
Or, as I like to say, nobody goes to see a Shakespeare play to find out how it ends.
Oh pray tell, Christopher Ambler give us a link like we did so we can check out your Efficacy, RicksBlog.com is quite different than anything you may show us all. RicksBlog.com is the Domaining Industry TIME STAMPED past information Gold Mine, we showed you our back up whats yours?
Gratefully, Jeff Schneider (Contact Group) (Metal Tiger) (Former Rockefeller IBEC Marketing Analyst/Strategist) (Licensed CBOE Commodity Hedge Strategist) http://www.UseBiz.com
Jeff, if you don’t know the history, I’m not here to educate you. Please feel free to believe whatever you wish, and I wish you luck in your endeavors.
Hello Christopher Ambler,
We not only know domaining History, we also helped create a lot of it. The Contact Group) are all Legacy Domainers.
RicksBlog.com is the Domaining Industry TIME STAMPED past information Gold Mine. For those who are looking for the really smart money Knowledge, RicksBlog.com
Gratefully, Jeff Schneider (Contact Group) (Metal Tiger) (Former Rockefeller IBEC Marketing Analyst/Strategist) (Licensed CBOE Commodity Hedge Strategist) http://www.UseBiz.com
The Google-Centric Ad companies are supporting the new GTLDs as the superior Marketing Strategy. This osolesced Google-Centric strategy will sink many new Net denizens new launch aspirations. The mere fact that the New GTLD operators have this cavalier attitude that fragile new Online business’s should not be alarmed if their businesses should ( GO DARK ) – or Offline with a shallow assuring (Trust Us its a minor issue )??
The Brand Damage this would cause is not minor but a major Online Marketing Strategy Misfire that can be avoided by using an already established extensions credibility (Prefferably the Dominant .COM Traffic Channel URLs, and employing a subdomain that incorporates the new GTLDs characteristics. This is what a really smart Marketing Strategist would choose. Sorry Donuts your arguments are filled with holes. JAS 12/4/15
Gratefully, Jeff Schneider (Contact Group) (Metal Tiger) (Former Rockefeller IBEC Marketing Analyst/Strategist) (Licensed CBOE Commodity Hedge Strategist) http://www.UseBiz.com
!00s of New GTLD sites may ( GO DARK ) – or Offline Read this damaging Report Google hopes you never read. http://internetidentity.com/press-release/iid-predicts-massive-botnet-takeover-of-iot-devices-by-2017/