Recent Posts
- Did GMO flunk evaluation on 27 gTLDs? CentralNic takes over the whole lot
- Fly9 offers services to simplify new gTLD sales
- Two failures among latest 44 new gTLD results
- Donuts puts 63 new gTLDs to private auction, but at least 17 are dead on arrival
- ‘Whistleblower’ claims cronyism and fear at ICANN
- Donuts hires the face of the new gTLD program
- Ombudsman probing “late” new gTLD objections
- Healthcare dot-brand drops out of gTLD race
- Afilias dumps .mail bid, and three other new gTLD withdrawals
- Global standards group highlights silliness of GAC’s IGO demands
- Massive internet policy database planned in Europe
- URS providers to get contracts
- Kiss-of-death gTLD applicant asks ICANN to reject “untimely” GAC advice
- TLDH weighs in on “terrifying” GAC advice
- Second .online gTLD bid and third ‘guardian’ dot-brand withdrawn
- New gTLDs applicants should brace for GAC delays
- 56 more new gTLDs pass evaluation
- Will you be too sexy for .sexy?
- This is how stupid the GAC’s new gTLDs advice is
- Demand Media slates GAC’s new gTLDs demands
Verisign selected for 220 new gTLDs
Verisign is the appointed back-end registry operator for 220 new generic top-level domain applications, according to the company.
Verisign itself has applied to ICANN for 14 new gTLDs, 12 of which are transliterations — ie, internationalized domain names — of .com and .net.
During its first-quarter 2012 earnings conference call, ongoing right now, CEO Jim Bidzos disclosed the numbers, saying:
VeriSign applied directly for 14 new gTLDs. Twelve of these 14 are transliterations of .com and .net. Also, applicants for approximately 220 new gTLDs selected Verisign to provide back-end registry services.
Many of these are dot-brands, Bidzos said.
Neustar, which also reported earnings yesterday, did not disclose how many applications it is involved in, other than to say that it has not applied for any as a front-end operator.
Recent Comments
To my knowledge, Fly9 is the only provider that enables multiple registrars, resellers and affiliates for a given TLD on... read more
GMO Registry probably got their CQS for .Tokyo (priority number 199) circa January 31, which would make their deadline e... read more
@Hiro Tsukahara: Please email me your direct email contact to marekgubala[at]email.cz, as I would like to send you so... read more
Hi Kevin, Let me clarify this -- GMO Registry hasn’t flunked any of its applications. Our IE results have simply been... read more
Tucows, Hexonet and TLD Registrar Solutions goes pretty much in the same direction as well.... read more
Anonymous, above, is correct that I cannot look at staff issues as these are excluded under my bylaw. It says, "the Ombu... read more
According to ICANN's Bylaws: "... the Ombudsman shall have no authority to act in any way with respect to internal admin... read more
I agree something the ombudsman should look into. However I will say sometimes leaders come into new companies and ne... read more
Then they should have withdrawn from the process as soon the risk of failing the evaluation was clear, like when they re... read more
If I were McKinsey I wouldn't want to disclose those financials, either. It's one of the places where the process wasn't... read more