Recent Posts
- UDRP respondent has name hidden on mental health grounds
- Facebook rebrand: did one new gTLD or domainer just hit the jackpot?
- .basketball domain emerges under GoDaddy with fewer hoops
- Donuts shuts down 14 registrars, but it’s “not related to DropZone”
- EURid fends off rivals for .eu contract
- Guy fills exact-match domain with porn, wins UDRP anyway
- Bahrain to relaunch ccTLD globally
- CentralNic says it’s making more money than expected
- Most registrars did NOT “fail” abuse audit, ICANN says
- Surprise eleventh-hour picks for NomCom leadership after ICANN U-turn
- Man with broken shift key sues ICANN and GoDaddy over Bitcoin domain
- Alice’s Registry disappears down the rabbit hole
- Nominet rebels dominate directorship slate
- 10 Years Ago… new gTLDs, ICANN pay, DNS abuse and ethics
- Nominet to purge £50 million from war chest for good causes as new chair outlines strategy
- .club — the whole TLD just went down
- Donuts’ DropZone approved despite competition fears
- I’m not kidding, ICANN is flirting with banning jokes
- DotConnectAfrica slammed for two-faced strategy as it loses .africa appeal
- PIR poaches new CTO from Verisign
- Marby finds his pandemic pessimism
- James Bond domains listed for sale by .bond registry
- Afnic gets renewed for .fr
- Tucows buys UNR’s registry business as Schilling bows out
- Neustar exec fingered in Trump’s Russian “collusion” probe
- Donuts’ drop-catching service not anti-competitive, ICANN says
- Almost no security researchers asking for Whois records – Tucows
- Price of Whois lookups could rise as ICANN delays reform work
- Cloudflare goes all-in with at-cost domains
- Hold on to your stats! ShortDot gets two gTLDs approved in China
- CentralNic spends $6.5 million on traffic network
- Nothing but losses ahead for MMX
- Afilias appeals .web ruling, Verisign responds with “rigging” claims
- ICANN won’t vote on new gTLDs for another year
- ICANN now has half a billion bucks in the bank after huge pandemic profits
- Dead dot-brands top 100. Here’s the list and breakdown
- I had a stroke
- Volkswagen drives IDN dot-brand off a cliff
- CTO Conrad quits ICANN
- France gets more domain takedown powers
- MMX to return GoDaddy cash to investors
- Could registrars get sued under new Texas abortion law?
- DropCatch raises antitrust concerns about Donuts’ Dropzone proposal
- ICANN could get the ball rolling on next new gTLD round this weekend
- Domain industry SHRINKS again… except of course it doesn’t
- Toilet-maker’s dot-brand gets flushed
- Latest geo-gTLD goes to sunrise
- NameSilo says it’s growing too fast to be acquired
- Most registrars fail ICANN abuse audit
- More privacy headaches? UK to withdraw from GDPR
- Bizarre redactions in Pirate Bay founder’s ICANN registrar ban
- ICANN cuts the weekend from next public meeting
- DotKids signs very weird new gTLD contract
- Dropping domains might get more expensive at Donuts
- .sucks registry probably “connected” to mass cybersquatter, panel rules
- As Kabul falls, Whois could present a danger to ordinary Afghans
- Second-level .au names coming next March with tight deadline
- ICANN director picks for 2021 revealed
- Over 2,000 attendees for ICANN 73?
- .za back-end deal up for grabs
- ICANN spills beans on Marby’s million-dollar payday
- ICANN 73 will be “virtual first”
- Registrars to get more domain takedown powers
- Irish domain sales closely track pandemic restrictions
- MMX drops two registrars
- “Crimes against humanity” claims against Afilias
- Dead dot-brands #92 and #93
- GoDaddy and MMX delay closure of $120 million gTLD deal
- This company had every reason to want a dot-brand, but just killed it off
- Olympics: Australia preemptively blocking Brisbane 2032 regs
- GoDaddy rides another 21 gTLDs into its stable
- CentralNic expects H1 revenue of $174 million
- Domainers at risk as EnCirca takes over deadbeat registrar’s customer base
- Another new gTLD applicant lawyers up on ICANN
- Big names shunned as Nominet names first registrar council members
- As judge freezes assets, is this OnlineNic domain portfolio really worth $70,000?
- Nominet names new chair, slashes exec pay, promises reforms and more boardroom exits
- Facebook’s war on privacy claims first registrar scalp
- GoDaddy welcomes four porn TLDs
- New gTLD buzz is back again as ICA hosts “second round” webinar
- Nope, no Seattle meeting for ICANN
- .org domains could come in seven new languages
- .com and NameSilo fingered as “most-abused” after numbers rocket
- MMX gets nod to sell 22 gTLDs to GoDaddy
- ICANN to hold hybrid meeting in October (not that one)
- Cambodia looking at new registry overseer
- Panel hands .sucks squatter a WIN, but encourages action against the registry
- Three rivals challenge EURid for .eu contract
- Amazon has started using hard-won .amazon
- Will you use SSAD for Whois queries?
- CentralNic gets into artificial intelligence
- “Diversity” warning over ICANN Seattle
- ICANN DOESN’T money-grub in new gTLD contract shocker
- Pirate Bay founder among candidates for Nominet advisory council
- XYZ scraps .tickets rules but won’t lower the price
- EURid scraps residency rules for three countries
- Epik buys DNForum, explores member ownership options
- Nominet throws money at member-chosen charities
- ICANN backtracks on executive pay transparency
- Brexit-hit domains can still be recovered
- Net4 domains now parked after “fraud” ruling
- Pride Month not transformative for .gay
- Schwartz makes deal to sell ass.com for over $6 million
- US Feds seize 33 Iranian news site domains
- Domain firms plan “Trusted Notifier” takedown rules
- Did Harry and Meghan squat the Queen? [clickbait]
- There’s really only one question about the return to face-to-face ICANN meetings
- Registries unveil plan to tackle botnet abuse with mass takedowns
- Next new gTLD round should be less English, says ICANN boss
- Cade and Dammak win ICANN awards
- In two weeks, Brits will lose their .eu domains forever
- ICANN waves off EFF concerns about the Ethos-Donuts deal
- ICANNers itching to get back to face-to-face shindigs
- How awful would ICANN 72 have to be for you to stay at home?
- More non-rules proposed for Whois privacy
- Domain regs dip for second quarter in a row and it’s all China’s fault
- ICANN 71 — now with added bearded men!
- .autos priced waaay below its XYZ rivals
- Barrett to replace Da Silva on ICANN board
- CentralNic trumpets organic growth as its registrars reverse shrinkage
- EURid sells 1,369 Cyrillic names in five years
- Afilias hints at more legal action over .web
- ShortDot plans domain blocking service for brands
- No more acquisitions for Nominet
- Afilias leftovers rebrand as Altanovo
PIR goes live with three non-Latin .org gTLDs
Kevin Murphy,
March 10, 2014, 15:30:48 (UTC),
Domain Registries
The internet has its first IDN versions of legacy gTLDs.
Public Interest Registry had three new gTLDs delegated over the weekend, all non-Latin versions of its flagship .org.
The gTLDs were .संगठन, which means “organization” in Hindi, and the Chinese .机构 and .组织机构, which seem to be two ways of saying “organization” too.
They’re not strictly speaking transliterations, as they represent whole dictionary words conceptually related to .org, rather than trying to approximate the spoken sound of “org”.
The .com equivalents Verisign has applied for in other scripts are actually meant to sound the same as “com” without actually meaning “commercial” or “company” in their language.
Because PIR has taken a different approach, there’s no grandfathering for existing .org registrants.
These three new gTLDs will be unrestricted, according to PIR’s applications, but will have slightly stricter rules on abuse — no porn will be allowed, for example.
“Because PIR has taken a different approach, there’s no grandfathering for existing .org registrants.”
Is there a source for this bit of info ?
Thx
There’s no mention of grandfathering in the applications.
There wasn’t in VRSN’s either. 😉
Hindi has never been allowed in 2nd level .org, thus there is nothing to grandfather for संगठन.
For the Chinese TLDs however, PIR should publicly comment on the question.
Errr. The Verisign application DO mention existing registrants.
They’re not the first, .OPR (xn--c1avg) beat them by 4 days.
And to be REALLY pedantic, I don’t think you can call them “IDN versions of Legacy TLD’s” if the IDN registrants in .org are being chucked under a bus by PIR.
Legacy implies inheritance. PIR’s existing registrant base didn’t inherit anything, other than a good rogering.
You’re right about .OPR. My software caught it when it was delegated but my brain didn’t.
No comment on your second point.
According to my information the upcoming launches from PIR are .орг, .机构, .संगठन – the Cyrillic, Chinese 2-character, and Hindi versions of .org. But I have not found any info on a TLD .组织机构. I am only a beginner in Chinese and also struggling but it seems you got mixed up with the Chinese 4-character version of .org which is 机构体制 and which to my info has not been announced yet. Hope this helps.
Hi Lutz,
Both .机构 (xn--nqv7f) and .组织机构 (xn--nqv7fs00ema) were delegated on 20140309
My Chinese is non-existent, but I’m referring to this:
https://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/applicationdetails/1762
The Chinese string there is 组织机构, which is what I used in this post. I’ve searched ICANN’s web site for 机构体制 and couldn’t find any applications.
Have I misunderstood what you’re saying?
Hi Drewbert, hi Kevin,
I know that both Chinese strings from PIR were delegated. But in the communication to the registrars PIR only announced the upcoming launch for the two character string in Chinese (plus the Cyrillic and Hindi version) with a probable sunrise (unconfirmed) in the coming weeks. PIR did not mention an upcoming launch of the 4-character string in Chinese even though it was delegated. I should have been clearer in my language.
And, Kevin, indeed your 4 characters in Chinese were definitely the right ones. Sorry for the confusion. Like I said – I am only a beginner in Chinese.
I am not a language expert but it is possible org in Cyrillic is both a translation and transliteration.
.org – Organization
.орг – Организация (Organization)
RegistrantA now owns Россия.org and RegistrantB will own Россия.орг
Both sound identical.
I thought ICANN did not permit aural confusion.
agb 2.2.1.1.3:
“Such category of objection is not limited to
visual similarity. Rather, confusion based on any type of
similarity (including visual, aural, or similarity of meaning)”
Only PIR itself had standing to file string confusion objection. That was one of the AGB design flaws: registrants, perhaps thru the Independent Objector or ALAC, should have standing if the same registry is proposing a confusingly similar TLD.