Latest news of the domain name industry

Recent Posts

Typosquatting is huge but not dangerous, study finds

Kevin Murphy, December 15, 2011, 16:18:13 (UTC), Domain Tech

A study of typosquatted domain names has found that the practice is reaching pandemic levels for the largest brands, but that there’s surprisingly little malware distribution going on.

The security company Sophos surveyed 2,249 domains that were one letter different to the .com sites of Facebook, Google, Twitter, Apple and Microsoft, and found that two thirds resolved.

Not all of those 1,502 sites were malicious typosquats; some were legitimate sites that just happened to have similarly spelled names (such as goole.com and witter.com) Sophos noted.

Apple was the most-squatted company, according to this method: resolving Microsoft typos were at 61%, Twitter at 74%, Facebook at 81%, Google at 83% and Apple at 86%.

Sophos concluded that “there is a significant typosquatting ecosystem around high-profile, often-typed domain names.”

But it did not find as much malware as it was expecting, with only one domain leading to a malware site, 0.07% of the total.

However, 2.7% of the URLs “fell into the loose category of cybercrime”, which “means they are, or have been, associated with hacking, phishing, online fraud or spamming”.

The report, which also fingers parking services from Demand Media, Sedo, Oversee and Bodis as the recipients of 37% of the typo traffic, contains much more data and is well worth a read.

Annoyingly, it appears that Sophos only surveyed .com domains, so the data doesn’t really tell us much about the impact of TLDs (such as .co) on the typosquatting problem.

Tagged: , , ,

Comments (2)

  1. KD says:

    Goole.com is a legitimate site? With a big ASK search bar on it? Hmm…

Add Your Comment