As .com shrinks, China adds another 1.2 million domains
The Chinese are still registering huge numbers of domain names, just apparently not in .com, new numbers suggest.
The country’s .cn ccTLD grew by more than 1.2 million domains in the second half of 2024 even as .com shrank and new gTLDs grew, according to the latest stats from local registry CNNIC.
The registry said it had 20,823,037 .cn names at the end of the year, which is 1,261,030 more than it reported for the mid-year point and 721,546 more than it had at the end of 2023.
CNNIC publishes its statistical reports twice a year and the numbers often fluctuate wildly. It’s not usual for .cn to gain or lose millions in the space of six months.
It peaked at over 23 million names in June 2020 and has gone as low as 15 million a year later.
The CNNIC report also says that the number of .com domains registered in the country at the end of the year was 7,047,974, down by 877,515 on the 7,925,489 it had at the end of 2023.
Verisign has partly blamed weakness in China for .com’s decline in several recent quarters.
CNNIC also said that the number of new gTLD domains registered in China at the end of 2024 was 3,640,877, up a whopping 1,574,304 on the 2,066,573 it had at the start of the year.
So that’s roughly 2.3 million net new names across .cn and new gTLDs in 2024, as .com lost almost 900,000.
I humbly suggest price is the driving factor here.
If you want to speculatively or nefariously register junk domains you can reasonably expect to find a new gTLD selling for a buck or two on any given day, but Verisign has been increasing its .com prices every year since the pandemic passed.
Verisign has recently started offering promotional discounts to its registrars, an attempt to return to DUM growth, and it looks like it might be working.
Second new gTLD contention set revealed
The first showdown between new gTLD application consultants D3 Global and Unstoppable Domains has emerged, with the announcement this week of a bid for a cartoons-themed gTLD by a D3 client.
D3 said in a press release it has partnered with outfits called Animecoin Foundation and Azuki to apply to ICANN for .anime, representing the Japanese art form, when the next application round opens a bit over a year from now.
Together, the two D3 partners provide a cryptocurrency designed to enable people to trade digital art NFTs, and the NFTs themselves.
But the expected .anime application is not the first to be publicly announced. Last June, Unstoppable said it’s planning to apply for .manga and .anime with a client called Kintsugi Global.
It’s the second likely contention set between publicly announced applicants. Freename.io and 3DNS have both separately announced bids for .chain, of course intended for blockchain-related usage.
The next application window is scheduled to open April 2026 or thereabouts. There are multiple ways contention sets can be resolved under the current rules, but the main one is expected to be an ICANN-managed auction.
UK intros global domain takedown law
The UK government has introduced legislation that would give police the power to order registries and registrars outside the country to take down domain names being used for serious crime.
The new Crime and Policing Bill (pdf), published yesterday, is a sprawling piece of proposed legislation, covering everything from mobile phone theft to antisocial behavior.
But it includes a section that would codify the police’s ability to demand domain names and IP addresses to be suspended for the first time.
The law would allow the police to ask a judge for a “domain name suspension order”, applicable for up to a year, where they believe the domain is being used to commit “serious crime”.
That’s defined as “the use of violence” or conduct that “results in substantial financial gain” or that would reasonably be expected to carry a jail sentence of three years or more.
Today, the UK police have voluntary relationships with local companies on takedowns. Nominet suspends many thousands of domains every year, most related to intellectual property crime, on the advice of police.
But according to the explanatory notes provided by the government, the law will not replace these deals. It says:
The government strongly supports these voluntary arrangements, and they will continue to be the first port of call for any activity in this space.
However, most domain name registries and registrars are situated outside of the UK and require a court order before they will action requests. These orders (an IP address suspension order or a domain name suspension order) will therefore primarily be served internationally, to ensure that any threat originating from outside the UK can be effectively tackled.
If overseas registries/registrars declined to enforce the court order, UK police could use “police-to-police cooperation and Mutual Legal Assistance” to get it done, the notes say.
The bill has to follow the usual parliamentary process before it becomes law.
No more Americans as Holland wins ICANN board seat
ICANN’s country-code registries have picked their next representative for the ICANN board of directors.
Byron Holland, CEO of Canadian ccTLD registry CIRA won the seat, which was vacated last September with the abrupt resignation of incumbent Katrina Sataki, who had already been reelected for a second term.
I believe Holland will join the board, after the formality of approval by ccNSO and the ICANN Empowered Community, immediately as Sataki’s replacement, rather that waiting for this year’s AGM as would usually be the case.
Holland comfortably beat Nick Wenban-Smith, general counsel of .uk registry Nominet, by 73 votes to 30 in a two-horse race described by one candidate as a disappointing choice between “two kind of middle-aged white guys and native English speakers”.
The election of a Canadian to replace a European as ccNSO representative means the ICANN board has topped out its quota of North Americans, which could have an impact on other election/selection processes.
ICANN’s bylaws state that each of the five geographic regions can have no more than five voting directors.
Directors Tripti Sinha, Sarah Deutsch and Miriam Sapiro all hail from North America. Term-limited Becky Burr, also American, is to be replaced later this year, but the shortlist of her replacement options are both also Americans.
This seems to mean that the Nominating Committee, charged this year with replacing term-limited European Maarten Botterman and renewing or replacing Sajid Rahman and Chris Chapman, both from Asia-Pacific, has had its field of candidates limited somewhat.
The Address Supporting Organization is also in election mode for its board seat this year, but neither of the candidates are North American.
Registries have started shutting down Whois
Nominet seems to have become the first major registry services provider to start to retire Whois across its portfolio, already cutting off service for about 70 top-level domains.
Queries over port 43 to most of Nominet’s former Whois servers are no longer returning responses, and their URLs have been removed from the respective TLDs’ records on the IANA web site.
The move follows the expiration last month of ICANN’s contractual requirements to provide Whois in all gTLDs. Now, registries must use the successor protocol RDAP instead, with Whois optional.
A Nominet spokesperson tells us the shut-off, which affects large dot-brand clients including Amazon, happened after consultation with ICANN and clients on January 29.
TLDs Nominet was supporting under ICANN’s Emergency Back-End Registry Operator program are also affected.
The registry spokesperson said that the gTLDs .broadway, .cymru, .gop, .pharmacy, and .wales are still offering Whois, due to an interoperability issue:
“The sole reason for the retention of these gTLD WHOIS services is for interoperability with the Brand Safety Alliance (BSA) service integration, which does not yet support RDAP,” she said.
The BSA is the GoDaddy-backed project that offers the multi-TLD GlobalBlock trademark-blocking service.
Nominet’s flagship .uk is also still offering Whois, because Nominet discovered that some of its registrars were still using it, rather than EPP, to do domain availability checks.
The fact that a GoDaddy service and some .uk registrars still don’t support RDAP, even after a years-long ICANN transition plan, is perhaps revelatory.
I’ll admit the only reason I noticed Nominet’s Whois coverage was patchy was that I’d neglected to update one of my scripts and it started failing. Apparently I was not alone.
While RDAP can be fairly simple to implement (if I can do it…), actually finding each registry’s RDAP server is a bit more complicated than under the Whois regime.
All gTLD registries were obliged to offer Whois at whois.nic.[tld], and IANA would publish the URLs on its web site, but RDAP URLs are not standardized.
It’s not super obvious, but it seems instead you have to head over to IANA’s “Bootstrap Service” and download a JSON file containing a list of TLDs and their associated base RDAP URLs.
ICANN wins IRP because complainant literally doesn’t exist
An Independent Review Process panel has thrown out a case filed by a failed new gTLD applicant because the applicant was found to have not existed for almost seven years.
A Bahrain-based company called GCCIX had applied to run .gcc, for Gulf Cooperation Council, in 2012. Its bid was rejected by ICANN the following year on the advice of the Governmental Advisory Committee because it had no affiliation with the actual GCC, a political grouping of nations in the Middle East.
GCCIX has been challenging the rejection ever since, filing an IRP against ICANN in 2021.
But it turns out GCCIX, which apparently had only one employee, has not legally existed in Bahrain since 2018, when it lost its corporate registration for reasons that still seem a mystery even to the IRP panelist.
This kinda scuppers the former company’s ability to do stuff like signing a contract to operate a top-level part of the internet’s infrastructure. Dismissing the case, the IRP panelist wrote:
The Tribunal determines that GCCIX’s status as company “deleted by law” precludes it from engaging in commercial activity under Bahrani law. Those commercial activities undoubtedly include entering into a Registry Agreement and providing the technical and other services required to operate a gTLD… GCCIX has not had the legal capacity to operate a gTLD since at least 2018 and has not revived its capacity despite having ample time to do so.
The question now is who has to pay for this debacle, which seems to involve somewhere between four and 12 years worth of legal fees and other costs. ICANN says it wants sanctions against GCCIX, too.
The panelist said that a decision on costs would have to be made by a full IRP panel, and it’s asked both parties to have a chat about whether they want one.
.com could return to growth this quarter
Verisign might have some better news for investors and analysts when it delivers its first-quarter financial results — it looks like .com might have turned a corner and returned to growth.
The TLD has added over 540,000 domains to its zone file between the start of the year and February 20, a little over halfway through the quarter, according to the numbers Verisign posts on its web site.
While Q1 has historically been seasonally strong, in the same period of 2024 .com was down by over 63,000 names. Over the whole of 2024, .com’s zone lost 3.7 million domains.
The company recently introduced some registrar marketing programs that CEO Jim Bidzos earlier this month said he was encouraged by. Several registrars have been spotted selling .com first-years for as much as 50% off the regular wholesale price.
Two big registrars — GoDaddy and Squarespace — kicked off expensive ongoing campaigns advertising their web site building services at the February 9 Super Bowl broadcast in the US.
Since the broadcast, .com is up by 186,000 names.
Verisign is currently predicting its domain name base across .com and .net will shrink by between 2.3% and 0.3% for the full year.
Could Musk’s DOGE kill off D3’s .doge?
The creation of the US Department of Government Efficiency raises the possibility of a government objection to .doge, a gTLD that D3 Global has announced it plans to apply for.
D3, a domain name consultancy that is promising to deliver gTLDs in next year’s application round that connect to identities currently only available on blockchains, has said it it working on a bid for .doge.
But that’s an exact match to DOGE, a not-quite “department” of the US government created by President Trump in the last few weeks and headed by megalomaniac billionaire troll Elon Musk.
DOGE is tasked with cutting government spending, waste and fraud, and the department’s devil-may-care modus operandi seems to spawn fresh controversy on an almost hourly basis.
In the D3 context, the word “doge” rather refers to a social media meme from well over a decade ago — a photo of a dog called Kabosu, now dead, used as the mascot of a cryptocurrency called Dogecoin.
D3’s partner on the bid is Own The Doge, a project of PleasrDAO that says it paid $4,240,000 in 2021 for the non-fungible token (NFT) of the original Kabosu photo.
Own The Doge then broke the NFT up into almost 17 billion pieces, which are traded like other digital assets. It also makes money selling Kabosu merch, licensing the image, and selling ownership of single pixels of the original image.
The silly governmental meaning and the silly crypto meaning are linked. Musk, a known fan of Dogecoin, seems to have first proposed DOGE as the name of the agency he proposed to lead as a kind of in-joke.
His first tweet on that topic came August 20 last year, a few weeks before the .doge bid was announced.
Given the timing, the exact-match spelling, and the crossover in the semantic Venn diagram, it seems a .doge gTLD application could present a pretty big target for a formal objection.
If the US decided to start throwing its weight around on ICANN’s Governmental Advisory Committee, which has substantial powers to scupper gTLD applications, it’s easy to see how it could horse-trade its way to getting a full consensus GAC objection.
But would a Musk-influenced Trump administration choose to object? Or could its mere existence actually prove beneficial to .doge’s future prospects?
We asked D3, and chief marketing officer Mark Trang told us:
While we’re not going to speculate on whether or not the Department of Government Efficiency will affect a future TLD like .doge, anything the current administration does to raise the visibility of domains, cryptocurrencies, and blockchains we view as a positive for our industry.
It almost certainly is far too early to speculate, but that’s never stopped me before.
Quite apart from the .doge issue, the Trump administration has yet to show its hand on how it will interact with internet governance in general and ICANN and the domain name industry in particular.
It looks today, over a year before the next new gTLD application window is scheduled to open, that this kind of thing is pretty far down the Trump administration’s priority list, if it’s even on the radar at all.
The relatively small National Telecommunications and Information Administration, which supplies the US with its civil service GAC representatives, doesn’t even have its politically appointed leadership yet.
The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, seen by some as Trump’s playbook for government reform, says nothing about ICANN or domain names in its NTIA section (pdf), and even gets the meaning of the A in the name wrong, calling it the “Agency”.
As for Musk, he’s known to be well across domain names as a concept, though he may be a .com fanboy. When he reacquired x.com from PayPal, before subsequently renaming Twitter around the domain, he said it was for sentimental reasons.
While it was pretty much an open secret that the pre-Musk Twitter planned to apply for a .twitter gTLD, the renaming to X of course means that it cannot be a dot-brand under ICANN rules banning single-character Latin TLDs.
But rules don’t seem to matter too much at this moment in history, when the US seems more than ready to dispose of decades-old conventions and use raw financial power to achieve its goals.
So, yeah, it’s pretty much too early to speculate about what .doge and the domain name universe looks like under the Trump/Musk administration, but it’s probably not too early to be worried, or maybe even a little afraid.
$2 million Christmas bonus for ICANN
The domain industry performed better than expected in the back half of last year — well, better at least than ICANN had predicted.
The Org today said it took in $2 million more in revenue than it expected in the second half of 2024 — ICANN’s fiscal first half — because the gTLD registries and registrars that primarily fund it processed more transactions than it had planned for.
Registry and registrar transaction fees — paid on registrations, renewals and transfers — were both a million bucks ahead of budget at $29 million and $20 million respectively
Its FY25 takings to the end of December totaled $74 million, ahead of its $72 million estimate but flat on its FY24 budget.
Operating costs were in-line with expectations and down on FY24 numbers due to fewer people having their flights and hotels paid for at ICANN 82 in Istanbul last October.
Another VW car dot-brand crashes out
Volkswagen’s patchy commitment to dot-brand gTLDs is in evidence again this week, as the company has told ICANN it no longer wishes to operate .bentley.
Bentley is one of VW’s luxury car brands, based in the UK. It’s exercised its option to unilaterally terminate its gTLD registry agreement, with no explanation given.
The gTLD had a single resolving domain, which redirected to a .com.
It’s the first dot-brand to terminate this year, thought the notice seems to have been filed with ICANN in December.
VW’s attitude to its original portfolio of dot-brands has been all over the place.
Its .volkswagen, which one might expect to be the flagship, was terminated four years ago, along with its Chinese version, but .seat and .audi each have thousands of active registrations.







Recent Comments