Recent Posts
- Volkswagen drives IDN dot-brand off a cliff
- CTO Conrad quits ICANN
- France gets more domain takedown powers
- MMX to return GoDaddy cash to investors
- Could registrars get sued under new Texas abortion law?
- DropCatch raises antitrust concerns about Donuts’ Dropzone proposal
- ICANN could get the ball rolling on next new gTLD round this weekend
- Domain industry SHRINKS again… except of course it doesn’t
- Toilet-maker’s dot-brand gets flushed
- Latest geo-gTLD goes to sunrise
- NameSilo says it’s growing too fast to be acquired
- Most registrars fail ICANN abuse audit
- More privacy headaches? UK to withdraw from GDPR
- Bizarre redactions in Pirate Bay founder’s ICANN registrar ban
- ICANN cuts the weekend from next public meeting
- DotKids signs very weird new gTLD contract
- Dropping domains might get more expensive at Donuts
- .sucks registry probably “connected” to mass cybersquatter, panel rules
- As Kabul falls, Whois could present a danger to ordinary Afghans
- Second-level .au names coming next March with tight deadline
- ICANN director picks for 2021 revealed
- Over 2,000 attendees for ICANN 73?
- .za back-end deal up for grabs
- ICANN spills beans on Marby’s million-dollar payday
- ICANN 73 will be “virtual first”
- Registrars to get more domain takedown powers
- Irish domain sales closely track pandemic restrictions
- MMX drops two registrars
- “Crimes against humanity” claims against Afilias
- Dead dot-brands #92 and #93
- GoDaddy and MMX delay closure of $120 million gTLD deal
- This company had every reason to want a dot-brand, but just killed it off
- Olympics: Australia preemptively blocking Brisbane 2032 regs
- GoDaddy rides another 21 gTLDs into its stable
- CentralNic expects H1 revenue of $174 million
- Domainers at risk as EnCirca takes over deadbeat registrar’s customer base
- Another new gTLD applicant lawyers up on ICANN
- Big names shunned as Nominet names first registrar council members
- As judge freezes assets, is this OnlineNic domain portfolio really worth $70,000?
- Nominet names new chair, slashes exec pay, promises reforms and more boardroom exits
- Facebook’s war on privacy claims first registrar scalp
- GoDaddy welcomes four porn TLDs
- New gTLD buzz is back again as ICA hosts “second round” webinar
- Nope, no Seattle meeting for ICANN
- .org domains could come in seven new languages
- .com and NameSilo fingered as “most-abused” after numbers rocket
- MMX gets nod to sell 22 gTLDs to GoDaddy
- ICANN to hold hybrid meeting in October (not that one)
- Cambodia looking at new registry overseer
- Panel hands .sucks squatter a WIN, but encourages action against the registry
- Three rivals challenge EURid for .eu contract
- Amazon has started using hard-won .amazon
- Will you use SSAD for Whois queries?
- CentralNic gets into artificial intelligence
- “Diversity” warning over ICANN Seattle
- ICANN DOESN’T money-grub in new gTLD contract shocker
- Pirate Bay founder among candidates for Nominet advisory council
- XYZ scraps .tickets rules but won’t lower the price
- EURid scraps residency rules for three countries
- Epik buys DNForum, explores member ownership options
- Nominet throws money at member-chosen charities
- ICANN backtracks on executive pay transparency
- Brexit-hit domains can still be recovered
- Net4 domains now parked after “fraud” ruling
- Pride Month not transformative for .gay
- Schwartz makes deal to sell ass.com for over $6 million
- US Feds seize 33 Iranian news site domains
- Domain firms plan “Trusted Notifier” takedown rules
- Did Harry and Meghan squat the Queen? [clickbait]
- There’s really only one question about the return to face-to-face ICANN meetings
- Registries unveil plan to tackle botnet abuse with mass takedowns
- Next new gTLD round should be less English, says ICANN boss
- Cade and Dammak win ICANN awards
- In two weeks, Brits will lose their .eu domains forever
- ICANN waves off EFF concerns about the Ethos-Donuts deal
- ICANNers itching to get back to face-to-face shindigs
- How awful would ICANN 72 have to be for you to stay at home?
- More non-rules proposed for Whois privacy
- Domain regs dip for second quarter in a row and it’s all China’s fault
- ICANN 71 — now with added bearded men!
- .autos priced waaay below its XYZ rivals
- Barrett to replace Da Silva on ICANN board
- CentralNic trumpets organic growth as its registrars reverse shrinkage
- EURid sells 1,369 Cyrillic names in five years
- Afilias hints at more legal action over .web
- ShortDot plans domain blocking service for brands
- No more acquisitions for Nominet
- Afilias leftovers rebrand as Altanovo
- American Gen Z not interested in ICANN?
- Honey Salt stops responding to .sucks cybersquatting complaints
- .web ruling hands Afilias a chance, Verisign a problem, and ICANN its own ass on a plate
- Verisign hopeful after decision reached in .web gTLD case
- As .spa launches, former partner pisses in the champagne
- ICANN chair reins in new gTLD timeline hopes
- Sav.com buys FIFTY new registrars
- Disclosure: I sold Tucows shares
- ICANN to auction off first failed new gTLD
- “Origami pinwheel” wins logo contest as Newfold comes out
- Now celebrities and politicians can block their porn names
- Pheenix goes AWOL, gets canned
- Could .trust be the next big crypto TLD?
- .fr up for grabs again
- Locked-down .music could launch this year
- MMX’s year marked by terrible renewals
- Biggest .co flip ever — bought for $25, sold for $300,000
- CentralNic wins .london back-end deal from Nominet
- Donuts offers name spinner to show potential attacks
- Two world wars and one dot-brand? Americans beat Germans in long-running gTLD fight, kinda
- Brexit specter creeping up on .eu
- ICANN CEO is first to get paid over $1,000,000 a year
- PDR wins beauty contest to take over Net4’s stranded customers
- ICANN throws out another challenge to the Donuts-Afilias deal
- Earnings reports: GoDaddy, Tucows and NameSilo report growth
- $40 million UNR auction brings fresh blood to domain industry
- ICANN name servers come under attack
- NamesCon will be virtual again this year, and more expensive
- Net4 nightmare almost over as court rules ICANN can shut down chaotic registrar
- IWF finds 3,401 “commercial” child porn domains
- Price caps on .org could return, panel rules
- DNS genius and ICANN key-holder Dan Kaminsky dies at 42
- .gov TLD quietly changes hands
- ICANN asks registries to freeze Net 4 India’s expired domains
- UNR cuts $5.2 million from price of new gTLD portfolio
- Formerly massive drop-catcher faces ICANN probe
- Verisign expects huge domain growth in 2021
“Ditch .com!” government to tell Indians
Kevin Murphy,
July 27, 2016, 09:49:37 (UTC),
Domain Registries
The Indian government is to urge citizens to register .in domain names instead of .com, according to local reports.
The Economic Times reports today that the Ministry of Economy and IT is to launch a “massive advertising campaign aimed at companies, individuals and startups” promoting .in.
Rajiv Bansal, MEIT joint secretary, is reported as saying the campaign will play up to nationalist sentiments
The government wants to grow .in from about 2.1 million domains to 3 million domains by March next year, it said.
Prices could come down to the $2 to $3 range, the paper said.
The campaign is due to start in a month or so, it was reported.
For a second I thought your title was about my domain name ditch.com 🙂
The problem with .in is that its version of UDRP makes UDRP look like a perfect system. .In decisions are a joke.
You should sell it to Radix or other new gTLD registries, it goes perfectly with “unCOMplicate” and similar themes…
That’s a good idea
I’m sure we will see an explosion of more registrations if the price goes down that much.
Will we ? Price is not the only issue affecting domain registrations in a country like India, local language support is also a challenge in a country that have many of those.
Actually, local language support isn’t nearly as crucial an issue in India as it is in say, China. That said, the Registry has been fairly sporting when it comes to promotions, with most Registrars offering deep discounts anyway. Awareness is a far bigger problem in a nation with over 60 million enterprises.
.IN is a very promising ccTLD, despite flaws in the INDRP. Ultimately the registry will see which side its bread is buttered on, and the market itself will lead to policy revision.
Many Indian .IN investor colleagues of mine are very enthusiastic about this forthcoming ad campaign by NIXI.
Ditch.com … Hard to take seriously a .COM domain that advocates abandoning .COM. Good brand name for other purposes, though.
It is a lot harder for a registry to change the habits of a market when the market itself is still in the early, outward looking phase. Most websites and development in that phase tend to be pitching to a global/export market and the .COM TLD is the most accepted TLD for that purpose. What the .IN registry has to do is to build usage in the .IN ccTLD so that it becomes the First Choice TLD for local businesses and users. Otherwise it will trigger a boom and bust cycle like those seen in .INFO, .XYZ etc. The renewal rates on heavily discounted registrations varies but on free registrations and substantially discounted ones, it is close to 5%.
@John McCormac,
In cases where the advertising is aimed primarly at domainers and pricing is dropped to 50 cents or even 1 penny, then – yes, absolutely – the registry encourages massive speculation by bulk buyers who are very unlikely to put domains to use. So, as you say, the name space locks itself into a boom and bust cycle.
But if the advertising is aimed at real business owners and consumers rather than domainers … and if registrations are only discounted by (say) 50% and not poured out onto the street for a million pennies … then the outcome may be quite different, leading to more real usage. In that scenario, the renewal rates could be much more stable and the doom of a boom/bust cycle averted.
Cheap domains are often felt to be inconsequential by owners who register them without any real deliberation. But “cheap” is relative. If a domainer in Berlin pays $3 for a .IN domain, he may feel little attachment to it. But to an Indian business owner registering his first .IN domain, that $3 (while hardly a fortune) counts for a bit more.