Recent Posts
- auDA chair defends $9 million windfall as no-confidence vote looms
- Swiss registry gets more traffic than Google, kinda
- Pritz to be named chair of Whois group
- Donuts confirms six-figure .news buyer used a fake name
- KeyDrive reverses into CentralNic in $55 million deal
- .pharmacy TLD faces action after losing complaint over Canadian drug peddler
- Donuts makes six-figure .news sale to dangerous conspiracy theorist
- MMX gets four more gTLDs approved for China use
- Four more dot-brands call it quits
- Plural gTLDs to be banned over confusion concerns
- Digital archery ruled out for next new gTLD round
- Could crypto solve the Whois crisis?
- Euro-Whois advice still as clear as mud
- New gTLD fees could be kept artificially high
- First-come, first-served for new gTLDs? Have your say
- Fight breaks out as Afilias eats Neustar’s Aussie baby
- .kids gTLD auction probably back on
- Archaeologists protest “televangelist” .bible gTLD
- .co first ccTLD to get China approval
- All Cyrillic .eu domains to be deleted
- ICANN heads to Cancun for Spring Break boondoggle
- GoDaddy signs up for basically unrestricted .travel gTLD
- Biggest TLD handover in history happens this weekend
- Web.com to be acquired for $2 billion
- Has the world’s biggest new gTLD registry gone bankrupt?
- $44 billion company is latest deadbeat gTLD registry
- How ICANN thinks YOU could get full Whois access
- After ICANN nod, MMX buys .xxx
- Donuts buys back .fan, ignores plural .fans
- Domainers could lose their names as .au loophole closes
- In GDPR case, ICANN ready to fight Tucows to the bitter end
- Three-letter .net leads as NamesCon charity auction raises €4,150 for Kenyan school
- Atallah encourages domainers to get involved in ICANN
- US asks if it should take back control over ICANN
- Christians rail against GoDaddy’s six-color gay rights flag
- Can’t get enough GDPR? Come to my NamesCon panel
- Court denies ICANN’s GDPR injunction against Tucows
- Million-euro Tucows GDPR lawsuit may not be ICANN’s last
- How all 33 European ccTLDs are handling GDPR
- After outcry, ICANNWiki to get ICANN funding next year
- ICANN slashes new gTLD income forecast AGAIN
- Sedo’s cunning GDPR workaround
- ICANN board talking GDPR “litigation”
- Failure to launch: 10 years-old gTLDs that are still dormant
- EnCirca partners with PandoraBots to push .bot names to brands
- Donuts freezes .place gTLD ahead of new geofencing rules
- Registrars want six-month stay on new Whois policy
- Lauded domainer arrested over $2.4 million “extortion”
- Domainers not welcome in this Whois database
- ICANN approves messy, unfinished Whois policy
MMX: three gTLDs approved for sale in Beijing
Three foreign new gTLDs have been approved for sale and resolution in Chinese capital Beijing, according to MMX.
The portfolio registry said today that its .vip is among the first to receive approval from the Beijing Communications Administration, one of China’s many regional authorities.
According to MMX, while many gTLDs have managed to pass through the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology’s stringent vetting process, the Beijing local authority has so far been slow to follow the national regulator’s lead.
But BCA approved .vip, along with GMO’s .shop and Donuts’ .ltd on August 16, the registry said in a market update.
This gives .vip national coverage in China, adding Beijing’s 22 million inhabitants.
MMX added that 188,764 different .vip sites, of the over 600,000 in its zone file, are currently indexed by Chinese search engine Baidu.
It also said that it plans to start selling Chinese-script internationalized domain names in .vip (in IDN.ascii format) in November.
thank you for publishing this piece, Kevin.
Kevin I think your headline is a bit off.
You may want to check with your source as I believe this is more about a new gTLD becoming “Bein-able” as they say in Chinese.
In other words, this is more about local registrants being able to obtain an “ICP” license that is a number that must appear on the footer of their website hosted within China that is associated with the new gTLD name.
Even if MIIT accredits a new gTLD, it usually takes awhile for each of the 30+ provincial telecommunication bureaus to accept the ICP Beian application for new TLDs.
Major cities/provinces like Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangdong are typically the most difficult places to get new gTLD ICP in China.
This is not about the ability to sell a domain name vs. enablement—being able to actually use it with a website that is hosted within China that resolves to the domain name.
Arguably it makes sense that a new gTLD has more “sales potential” in China if registrants located in China have actual plans to use the name in commerce; however I’m not yet convinced that a majority of the new gTLD names registered from within China are for actual use in China vs. mass speculation and resale purposes. (i.e. “Make a quick buck”)