Recent Posts
- Chutzpah alert! DotKids wants ICANN handout to fight gTLD auction
- Afilias gets Guinness record for .au migration
- KSK vote was NOT unanimous
- ICANN turns 20 today (or maybe not)
- Van der Laan to leave ICANN board
- Set buttocks to clench! ICANN approves risky KSK rollover
- Mediators hired as Whois reformers butt heads
- US scraps fucking stupid “seven dirty words” ban
- Beginning of the end for DomainTools? Court orders it to scrub Whois records
- PIR chief: registries should stop stressing about volume
- .CLUB sees spam double after China promotion
- Com Laude acquires Scottish rival
- CentralNic acquired yet another company
- Empty Whois a threat to the US elections?
- Donuts gets bought by former ICANN CEO’s firm
- .tel’s second-biggest registrar gets canned
- Whois privacy did NOT increase spam volumes
- Afilias finally admits it’s American
- Could a new US law make GDPR irrelevant?
- No more free ride for ICANN Fellows?
- Afilias sues India to block $12 million Neustar back-end deal
- More consolidation? Endurance said to be up for sale
- ICANN faces critical choice as security experts warn against key rollover
- .CLUB revenue not all that
- Microsoft seizes “Russian election hacking” domains
- New gTLDs rebound in Q2
- .CLUB revenue reportedly $7.2 million
- How a single Whois complaint got this registrar shitcanned
- 38th dot-brand bows out after acquisition
- ICANN CTO: no reason to delay KSK rollover
- DomainTools tracks its one billionth domain
- ICANN closes GoDaddy Whois probe
- Allstate dumps a dot-brand
- I was wrong, Famous Four bosses WERE kicked out
- No Verfügungsanspruch for ICANN in GDPR lawsuit
- Famous Four is DEAD! New registry promises spam crackdown
- auDA car crash continues as director quits over foreign members
- New ICANN director named
- My brain explodes trying to understand MMX’s new blockchain deal for .luxe
- Fight over Whois access starts early
- Blacknight calls for Ireland to slash domain prices
- Chaotic scenes as ‘Grumpies’ lose auDA board fight
- These 33 people will decide the future of Whois
- Wix.com obtains ICANN accreditation — bad news for Web.com?
- Two companies “capture” auDA
- Facebook clashes with registrars after massive private data request
- Baidu gets Chinese approval for .baidu
- ICANN rejected Israel as meeting venue due to threat from Gaza and Iran
- ICANN’s GDPR lawsuit bounced up to appeals court
- Neustar swaps out CEO, PIR looking for new CEO
Over 50,000 names sold as .shop has successful launch day
GMO Registry has recorded one of the most successful new gTLD launch days to date, selling over 45,000 .shop domain names in the first hours.
The company said it sold 45,427 .shop names in the first two hours after general availability started yesterday afternoon at about 1600 UTC.
The total at that point was 51,755, including about 5,000 that were registered during the Early Access Period, during which names carried higher prices.
The latest .shop zone file contains 46,419 domains.
The registry had sold 616 premium-priced names already, GMO said.
The volume is quite impressive given the retail price tags — .shop is not priced for budget Chinese domainers, it’s selling for $20 to $30 at the major Western registrars.
That’s double, triple or even 10 times as much as Minds + Machines’ self-consciously ‘non-freenium’ .vip domains were selling for when it racked up a six-figure volume during its first day of GA earlier this year.
West.cn, the leading Chinese new gTLD registrar, priced .vip at $3 but is selling .shop at $25.
GMO paid a then record-setting $41.5 million for the rights to .shop at an ICANN auction back in January.
Recent Comments
hey .kids what a great idea, wish i had thought of it...... oh wait i did. at least ICANN isnt talking about goats... read more
Kevin: Of course, but since many people outside the ccTLD world assume otherwise, it's important to make the point ... read more
My dissenting vote statement on the KSK rollover vote can be found at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kKXQ1OcdUt... read more
So the "Green Paper" proposing the establishment of ICANN was published in Feb 1998, and the organization was stood up 7... read more
This is perhaps true, but only for domains registered under gTLDs. Many ccTLDs have contracts with their registrants ... read more
Indeed. You referred to archives. That info is from the live current database. But as I said, 'who cares'? A fe... read more
You are right. But who cares? ICANN was formed on 30th Sept., 1998. It took me less than two minutes to verify tha... read more
Hi, it might be interesting to see an update of this table. Thanks Charles... read more
Agreed. Some registries might need data, like the ones from Validated TLDs, but most registries have no real use for reg... read more
Does a registry really need registrant data? .COM seems to do rather well without for over 2 decades.... read more