Recent Posts
- It’s hustings season at Nominet
- ICANN rushes mystery directors onto board in apparent bylaws breach
- ICANN staffing up for next new gTLD round
- Radix premium revenue hits $3.8 million in first half
- GoDaddy shutters Twitter accounts after MMX deal
- nickel.com sells for a hell of a lot more than a nickel
- German motoring club dot-brand crashes out
- Verisign to crack down on Chinese domains
- Whois Disclosure System likely over a year away
- Belgium slashes its ICANN funding in “mission creep” protest
- Diversity takes a hit as NomCom replaces two ICANN directors with newcomers
- RDNH loser files second appeal
- Group crowdfunding crypto to apply to ICANN for blockchain gTLD
- Buyer “phasing out” domain “bought for $2.2 million”
- ShortDot drops premium fees on millions of domains
- Tucows’ domains business stagnates again in Q2
- Malaysia relaxes travel restrictions ahead of ICANN 75
- GMO to sell Unstoppable’s crypto domains
- More rules, but cozier ICANN 75 expected
- India offers dollar regs to celebrate independence
- auDA updates on 2LD .au sales
- At $15 million, nfts.com becomes second-biggest domain sale ever
- Now Nokia scraps a dot-brand
- InternetNZ appoints new CEO
- Looks like XYZ bought another gTLD
- Bugatti dumps dot-brand under new owners
- In pictures: from tuk-tuks to cheese wheels, every ICANN national stereotype 2016-2022
- Did ICANN pay for most meeting attendees to show up in The Hague?
- Verisign announces ANOTHER price increase as regs slide
- CentralNic signs Greenland deal
- Early “dot-brand” adopter wants to scrap its gTLD
- Verisign to mandate 2FA for .com registrars
- Unstoppable valued at over $1 billion after huge new investment
- ICANN staffer to referee closed generics fight
- Covid vaccine maker takes RDNH loss to ICANN board
- Guy asks ICANN to shut down prostitution site
- No smoking! Rules laid down as .kids reveals launch dates
- Nominet sold security unit for a dollar after blowing $23.5 million
- CentralNic revenue almost doubles
- Feds warn of Covid risk from “dark” Whois
- ICANN names NomCom chairs
- ICANN’s top brass get pay raises
- New gTLD prep work delayed until December
- New gTLDs WILL be delayed by Whois work
- ICANN backtracks on legal waiver for ICANN 75
- Community tells ICANN to walk and chew gum at the same time
- Five things I learned from UK prime minister candidates’ domain names
- Universal unacceptance? ICANN lets XYZ dump languages from UNR gTLDs
- ICANN terminates these three deadbeat registrars
- .xyz kicks France out of the top 10 TLDs — Verisign
- ICANN puts blockchain on the agenda for good
- New gTLD in trouble as largest registrar gets suspended
- ICANN picks comms firm for new gTLDs outreach
- Donuts goes with bland, forgettable, for new company name [rant]
- Broker says it will sue after DNS abuse sting operation
- Unstoppable targets another city gTLD with free domains
- Dynadot takes down its own web site after apparent breach
- The slow crawl to closed generics at ICANN 74
- Controversial Chinese firm among two newly revealed UNR gTLD buyers
- Over 900 people show up for ICANN 74
- Verisign and Afilias spar over .web delays
- Hamburg selected for next year’s ICANN AGM
- Amazon governments not playing ball with Amazon’s .amazon
- High fives, or elbows only? ICANN 74 intros traffic light system for socializing
- NetBeacon goes live for DNS abuse reporting
- As registration closes, many ICANN 74 sessions at bursting point
- Belarusian domains to change hands
- As GoDaddy shutters URL shortener, could x.co come back on the market?
- Nominet opens directorship nominations
- GoDaddy acquires two education-themed gTLDs
- Crypto domains: a feminist issue?
- Turkey name change could free up gTLD string
- Porkbun offering free .gay domains for Pride month
- DNSAI to name most-abused registries, registrars
- NameSilo profitable in Q1
- Meds regulator won’t say why it gets domains suspended
- Porkbun hits a million domains
- Porn names to feature at NamesCon Global
- Pizza company suffers from penisland syndrome
- Seat reservations and waiting lists on the cards for ICANN 74
- New gTLDs or Whois access? What’s more important?
- Domain sales down even as revenue booms at CentralNic
- ICANN kicks the can on .web yet again
- ALAC’s brutal takedown of that “aggressive” ICANN 74 coronavirus waiver
- .link gTLD buyer revealed
- After 10 months, ICANN board “promptly” publishes its own minutes
- China yanks Daily Stormer domain after Buffalo mass shooting
- Fewer domain companies closing down than expected
- ICANN highlights “not getting things done” risk
- Another single-TLD brand protection service planned
- Dot Hip Hop slashes prices 80% in relaunch
- Three gTLDs to lose Donuts trademark protection
- Tucows to reanimate Tucows brand as sales flatten
- Blockchain domains pose “significant risks” to internet, says ICANN
- Russian registry hit with second breach notice after downtime
- Two countries could lose registrar competition after breach notices
- .tattoo — another UNR gTLD auction winner emerges
- Neustar now linked to scandal in the Catholic church
- SSAD: Whois privacy-busting white elephant to be shelved
- ICANN reports shocking increase in pandemic scams
- Kaufmann selected for ICANN board
- Secondary market fluffs GoDaddy amid slowdown concerns
- Washington DC picked for ICANN 77
- UDRP suspended in Ukraine
- Gee, thanks. auDA cuts price of .au names by five cents
- ICANN salary porn: 2021 edition
- A sign of things to come? Verisign slashes outlook in post-pandemic slowdown
- UDRP comments reveal shocking lack of trust in ICANN process
- CentralNic sees 51% growth in Q1
- Ukraine won’t delete domains until war is over
- Covid surge scuppers ICANN LA meetings
- Vox Pop defends its favorite cybersquatter
- ICANN picks recipient of $1 million Ukraine aid
- More friction over closed generics
- ICANN’s Covid-19 waiver formally appealed
- GoDaddy and XYZ sign away rights after UNR’s crypto gambit
- Verisign wipes free TLDs from the world stats
- ICANN picks 28 registries for abuse audit
- TMCH turning off some brand-blocking services
- Bye-bye Alice’s Registry
- .kids goes live, plans to launch this year
- ICANN suggests its Covid waiver may be worthless
- Domain sales exempt from US sanctions on Russia
- African Union can’t register .africa domain
- Microsoft seizes domains Russia was using to attack Ukraine
No more free transfers in Denmark
Kevin Murphy,
December 12, 2018, 10:45:45 (UTC),
Domain Services
The Danish ccTLD registry has announced that it is to introduce a charge for .dk transfers for the first time in January.
From the start of 2019, transfers between registrants will cost DKK 50 (about $7.50), DK Hostmaster said today.
Currently, transfers are free.
It appears that the new fee will be levied on the gaining registrant.
DK Hostmaster said that the fee is to cover “administrative costs”.
.dk has about 1.3 million domains under management.
No this is wrong, the transfer under there statement means trade of owner and are therefore not in line with other TLD’s.
This change will actually create the insane process that you have to pay for correcting wrong spelling in name or company name…
Benny,
I would respectfully disagree with you. Last year the ccTLD Manager implemented a Registrant verification process which resulted in a substantial reduction in IP infringement, in fact they have been recently given several awards for this change.
With regard to Registrants being charged for typos, I believe this would be highly unlikely given that DK Hostmaster has actually employed Registrant verification using digital identity, see https://www.dk-hostmaster.dk/en/id-check
This process involves the use of NimID for Denmark nationals (both Natural and Legal) see https://www.nemid.nu/dk-en/about_nemid/business/ and the use of a separate process for non-Denmark nationals, see https://www.dk-hostmaster.dk/sites/default/files/2017-12/Procedure%20for%20kontrol%20af%20kontaktoplysninger%20og%20id%20for%20reg%20med%20bopael%20udenfor%20DK_EN.pdf
Therefore I think the nominal charge of DKK 50 is not unreasonable to provide a more trusted zone within the .DK name space. In fact, it will be interesting to see if this verification process potentially helps mitigate instances of domain name hijacking.
There are other Registries that impose inter-registrant verification processes, e.g. fTLD in connection with .BANK and .INSURANCE. While fTLD I do not believe currently charge for these types of transfers, the wholesale price they charge is substantially higher than the more modest .DK fees.
I personally think this is a trend that is likely to continue to emerge across the broader domain name industry over time. While there are cynics that will likely claim that this is Registries looking to extract more fees from a declining/stable base of domain names, I personally view it as a positive step in creating a more secure, stable, and verified TLD space.
Best regards,
Michael
This verification you apparently think i so fantastic are only for people living in DK, anyone outside are not verified in that way.
So the fact is this, if a registrant outside of Denmark are going to correct the data on the “owner” it is treated as an owner change and you have to pay. Thats the process as it is today.
Do you honestly think this is fair?
So before you glorify this insanity maybe you should understand what the process are and the side effects of it. There are no cost for them it’s all done by the registrant in the self service portal. If you want registrants to keep there records up to date a fee for doing so are NOT the way to.
Hey Michael, thank you for you words…. but “Therefore I think the nominal charge of DKK 50 is not unreasonable to provide a more trusted zone within the .DK name space”
is for me totally different then what the Registry wrote: “administrative costs”
and then: to turn arround the argument: all ccTLDs that dont charge for a trade is an untrusted zone ?
i cant see a good reason to put a price on that in such short notice without – if a registry is arguing: there is not enough money, we need to higher the price.. its ok for me – lets talk…. but this is somehow – weird.
best regards
hagi
Charging 50 DKK for a change of ownership, well okay.
Charging 50 DKK to correct data seems to violate the accuracy principle of the GDPR.