Recent Posts
- Palage’s epic rant as he asks ICANN to cancel Verisign’s .net contract
- Papac named interim ICANN Ombudsman
- Nominet takes over Bounty mutineers’ ccTLD
- .tube registry claims victory in linkification fight
- Ancient registrar gets ICANN breach notice over UDRP
- ICANN is starting to auto-renew new gTLD contracts
- Freenom hit by FIFTH ICANN action after litany of screw-ups
- Second DNSSEC screw-up takes down Aussie web sites
- Nominet adds handcuffs clause to proposed new Articles
- Single/plural gTLD combos to be UNBANNED
- ICANN rejects a whole bunch of new gTLD policy stuff
- Volkswagen ditches its dot-brand
- Radix looking for a back-end
- Is this why WhatsApp hates some TLDs but not others?
- Blockchain domain firm raises $2.5 million
- Verisign: 1.7 million domain industry growth in Q2
- Namecheap has given away 500,000 free .me domains
- Epik had another terrible month in May
- Blockchain startup gets $5 million to apply for gTLDs
- Buckridge to replace Shears on ICANN board
- CentralNic rebrands as Team Internet
- .ai sells 100,000 domains in a year
- Google to launch two fun new gTLDs next month
- Domainers not welcome as .music readies September launch
- Another six dot-brands self-terminate (two are very strange)
- Four more years for Identity Digital in Oz
- ICANN might be a director light after election stalemate
- ICANN turns down money from blockchain alt-root
- CentralNic chief calls on industry to tackle climate change
- London Domain Summit starts tomorrow
- Closed generics ban likely to remain after another policy group failure
- Ukrainian domains slide as war becomes the new normal
- Epik had worst month ever in April
- Go.Compare now redirecting to the .com
- Huge telco dumps gTLDs after rebrand
- Rejected former director threatens to sue Nominet
- April 2026 is the date for the next new gTLD round
- Doria leaving ICANN board a loss for new gTLD program
- A second new gTLD has FAILED and will be sold off
- .web hit by second ICANN complaint
- Registrar linked to defunct social network terminated
- Three candidates stand for Nominet board
- Next round of gTLDs could come much sooner than expected
- Registering .cv domains might become easier
- Musk prematurely announces Twitter is now X
- Nominet admits membership fees mistake
- Government to regulate UK-related domain names
- Domainer objects to Epik’s acquisition over Masterbucks collapse
- Freenom is losing another ccTLD after collecting military emails
- DENIC kicks out NCC as ICANN’s sole escrow agent
- ICANN takes over country’s ccTLD after Hall of Famer’s death
- ICANN Ombudsman quits
- ICA baffled by plan to outlaw domaining in India
- No $8 million discount for dot-brands, says ICANN
- Epik lost 125,000 domains in Q1
- Buckingham leaves Nominet’s board early
- Epik is off the ICANN naughty step
- Identity Digital is gobbling up Verisign’s back-end business
- o.com auction likely a damp squib after Overstock rebrand
- ICANN actually CHANGES Verisign’s .net contract after public comments
- GoDaddy takes over .health
- The looooong road to urgently hiring ICANN’s next CEO
- Rwanda picked for ICANN meeting
- Governments call for ban on gTLD auctions
- Red Cross gets takedown powers over .org domains
- Domain universe grew 1% in Q1
- Closed generics and IDNs debates are big drag on new gTLDs
- New gTLD registry gets second ICANN breach notice
- Epik lost another 22,000 domains to transfers in February
- Mystery buyer rescues Epik at end of crazy week
- Millions of domains to be deleted as Freenom loses its first TLD
- Everyone hates Verisign’s new .net deal
- UAE boasts rapid domain growth in 2022
- ICANN just put a date on the next new gTLD round
- Three more straggler new gTLDs coming soon
- Three more dot-brands realize the futility of existence
- woke.com among domains in NamesCon auction
- Domainer asks court to block Epik sell-off
- .web delay likely after Verisign rival files ICANN appeal
- CentralNic starts returning cash to shareholders as revenue grows
- Newly launched .zip already looks dodgy
- Progress made on next new gTLD round rules
- Brands ask for cheaper ICANN fees
- ICANN salary porn: 2022 edition
- Tucows and GoDaddy see weakness in big-ticket aftermarket sales
- Another registrar seemingly vanishes
- Verisign “pleased” at ICANN’s .web call
- .hiphop returns to GoDaddy after Uniregistry snub
- Danish national registry changes its name. Don’t laugh.
- ICANN signs Whois’ death warrant in new contracts
- Verisign WILL get .web, ICANN rules
- Verisign narrows domain growth guidance
- Epik exodus topped 100,000 domains in January
- Nominet looking for another director
- CentralNic expects revenue up 24% in Q1
- Epik CEO tries to wriggle out of $327,000 refund lawsuit
- Travel gTLD registry dumps three strings — NOT dot-brands
- Worried about governments seizing .com domains? Too late
- Epik’s meltdown is a ticking time-bomb for ICANN
- Epik customer exodus started when Monster quit
- ICANN wants more newbies on its board
- AcornDomains bought by conference organizer
- Uniregistry successor makes big pricing changes on two TLDs
- ICANN to crowd-source CEO search
- Verisign’s .net contract up for public comment
- About 6,000 .au domains remain contested
- New gTLDs — implementation talks to start next month
- Epik sued over financial meltdown
- ChatGPT maker files UDRP on .com match
- Costerton drops rap album to attract Gen Z to ICANN
- .food registry to dump four dot-brand gTLDs
- Google to drop EIGHT new gTLDs
- .org back-end contract up for grabs
- The end of “do-nothing” ICANN?
- Governments backtracking on closed generics ban
- Radix sold almost $8 million of premiums last year
- .com was a drag on the industry in Q4
- Identity Digital hit by failure of Silicon Valley Bank
- .art links DNS and alt-root ENS
- Brands want new gTLD fast track
- Facebook sues free domains registry for cybersquatting
- Whois disclosure system coming this year?
- Euro registrars merge to form Your.Online
- This is why ICANN is worried about new gTLDs right now
- Identity Digital to launch .watches this month
No more free transfers in Denmark
Kevin Murphy,
December 12, 2018, 10:45:45 (UTC),
Domain Services
The Danish ccTLD registry has announced that it is to introduce a charge for .dk transfers for the first time in January.
From the start of 2019, transfers between registrants will cost DKK 50 (about $7.50), DK Hostmaster said today.
Currently, transfers are free.
It appears that the new fee will be levied on the gaining registrant.
DK Hostmaster said that the fee is to cover “administrative costs”.
.dk has about 1.3 million domains under management.
No this is wrong, the transfer under there statement means trade of owner and are therefore not in line with other TLD’s.
This change will actually create the insane process that you have to pay for correcting wrong spelling in name or company name…
Benny,
I would respectfully disagree with you. Last year the ccTLD Manager implemented a Registrant verification process which resulted in a substantial reduction in IP infringement, in fact they have been recently given several awards for this change.
With regard to Registrants being charged for typos, I believe this would be highly unlikely given that DK Hostmaster has actually employed Registrant verification using digital identity, see https://www.dk-hostmaster.dk/en/id-check
This process involves the use of NimID for Denmark nationals (both Natural and Legal) see https://www.nemid.nu/dk-en/about_nemid/business/ and the use of a separate process for non-Denmark nationals, see https://www.dk-hostmaster.dk/sites/default/files/2017-12/Procedure%20for%20kontrol%20af%20kontaktoplysninger%20og%20id%20for%20reg%20med%20bopael%20udenfor%20DK_EN.pdf
Therefore I think the nominal charge of DKK 50 is not unreasonable to provide a more trusted zone within the .DK name space. In fact, it will be interesting to see if this verification process potentially helps mitigate instances of domain name hijacking.
There are other Registries that impose inter-registrant verification processes, e.g. fTLD in connection with .BANK and .INSURANCE. While fTLD I do not believe currently charge for these types of transfers, the wholesale price they charge is substantially higher than the more modest .DK fees.
I personally think this is a trend that is likely to continue to emerge across the broader domain name industry over time. While there are cynics that will likely claim that this is Registries looking to extract more fees from a declining/stable base of domain names, I personally view it as a positive step in creating a more secure, stable, and verified TLD space.
Best regards,
Michael
This verification you apparently think i so fantastic are only for people living in DK, anyone outside are not verified in that way.
So the fact is this, if a registrant outside of Denmark are going to correct the data on the “owner” it is treated as an owner change and you have to pay. Thats the process as it is today.
Do you honestly think this is fair?
So before you glorify this insanity maybe you should understand what the process are and the side effects of it. There are no cost for them it’s all done by the registrant in the self service portal. If you want registrants to keep there records up to date a fee for doing so are NOT the way to.
Hey Michael, thank you for you words…. but “Therefore I think the nominal charge of DKK 50 is not unreasonable to provide a more trusted zone within the .DK name space”
is for me totally different then what the Registry wrote: “administrative costs”
and then: to turn arround the argument: all ccTLDs that dont charge for a trade is an untrusted zone ?
i cant see a good reason to put a price on that in such short notice without – if a registry is arguing: there is not enough money, we need to higher the price.. its ok for me – lets talk…. but this is somehow – weird.
best regards
hagi
Charging 50 DKK for a change of ownership, well okay.
Charging 50 DKK to correct data seems to violate the accuracy principle of the GDPR.