Recent Posts
- Over 6,000 Brexit domains snapped up after mass delete
- Verisign saw MASSIVE query spike during Facebook outage
- .xxx shows up in botnet top-five TLDs for the first time
- ICANN splits $9 million new gTLD ODP into nine tracks
- “We fell short” — Tucows says sorry for Enom downtime
- Crain named ICANN CTO
- Bank spends $800,000 to move from a .bank to the exact-match .com
- Battle for .web “far from over”, says Afilias lawyer
- BMW porn site leads to registrar getting suspended
- CentralNic grows revenue 70% in 2021
- Nightmare downtime weekend for some eNom and Google customers
- XYZ bosses agree to pay $1.5 million to settle Fed’s loan scam claims
- New gTLD pioneer MMX to wind up
- ICANN trying to strangle SSAD in the crib?
- ICANN trying to water down its transparency obligations
- A decade after the last new gTLD round, Marby starts the clock on the next one
- Monte Cahn revealed as third new gTLD buyer
- “National security” cited as registry says you have to ask its CEO if you want to register more than TWO domains
- Whois reform to take four years, cost up to $107 million A YEAR, and may still be pointless
- New year, new server, new functionality
- ICANN is blocking 23 gTLD transfers over blockchain fears
- GoDaddy gets another year to negotiate .xxx contract
- GoDaddy wins .tv contract after Verisign blows off 20-year deal
- EURid’s CEO is retiring
- Omicron domain sells for $5,000
- Hamburg to have second crack at hosting ICANN meeting
- .org back-end deal will come up for re-bid, PIR says as it acquires four new gTLDs
- ICANN budget: staff bloat making a comeback
- ICANN budget: no more new gTLDs before 2028
- ICANN budget: mild optimism amid maturing industry
- ICANN says ODP will speed up new gTLDs in the long run
- Be the next “face” of dot-brands
- CentralNic makes another registrar acquisition
- ICANN takes the lamest swipe at Namecheap et al over blockchain domains
- GoDaddy hack exposed a million customer passwords
- EURid to drop 48,000 Brexit domains in one day
- Google to release another new gTLD next month
- XYZ counting standard sales as “premiums” because its fees are so expensive
- Nominet names Paul Fletcher new CEO
- CentralNic takes over a dead dot-brand
- Delta variant cranks up Aussie domain regs in Q3
- .music goes live, plots 2022 launch
- Three ICANN directors wanted to go to Puerto Rico
- Architect of Nominet boardroom bloodbath and Tucows backer win director seats
- Virgin territory as GoDaddy pushes $30 million porn domain renewals
- ICANN abandons face-to-face plan for Puerto Rico
- ICANN teases prices for private Whois lookups
- ICANN adds another six months to Whois reform roadmap
- ICANN domains revenue ahead of estimates again
- GoDaddy says it turned around Neustar, and .biz numbers seem to confirm that
- If you guessed Facebook’s “Meta” rebrand, you’re probably still a cybersquatter
- Almost 300,000 UK .eu regs disappeared because of Brexit
- Whois rule changes that nobody likes get approved anyway
- ICANN 72 has lowest turnout since records began
- CSC (not that one) scraps its dot-brand
- Verisign boss talks .web launch, timing and pricing
- First UNR gTLD buyer outs itself
- ICANN boss warns over existential “threat” from Russia
- Big dose of reality for gTLD-hungry dot-brand applicants
- UDRP respondent has name hidden on mental health grounds
- Facebook rebrand: did one new gTLD or domainer just hit the jackpot?
- .basketball domain emerges under GoDaddy with fewer hoops
- Donuts shuts down 14 registrars, but it’s “not related to DropZone”
- EURid fends off rivals for .eu contract
- Guy fills exact-match domain with porn, wins UDRP anyway
- Bahrain to relaunch ccTLD globally
- CentralNic says it’s making more money than expected
- Most registrars did NOT “fail” abuse audit, ICANN says
- Surprise eleventh-hour picks for NomCom leadership after ICANN U-turn
- Man with broken shift key sues ICANN and GoDaddy over Bitcoin domain
- Alice’s Registry disappears down the rabbit hole
- Nominet rebels dominate directorship slate
- 10 Years Ago… new gTLDs, ICANN pay, DNS abuse and ethics
- Nominet to purge £50 million from war chest for good causes as new chair outlines strategy
- .club — the whole TLD just went down
- Donuts’ DropZone approved despite competition fears
- I’m not kidding, ICANN is flirting with banning jokes
- DotConnectAfrica slammed for two-faced strategy as it loses .africa appeal
- PIR poaches new CTO from Verisign
- Marby finds his pandemic pessimism
- James Bond domains listed for sale by .bond registry
- Afnic gets renewed for .fr
- Tucows buys UNR’s registry business as Schilling bows out
- Neustar exec fingered in Trump’s Russian “collusion” probe
- Donuts’ drop-catching service not anti-competitive, ICANN says
- Almost no security researchers asking for Whois records – Tucows
- Price of Whois lookups could rise as ICANN delays reform work
- Cloudflare goes all-in with at-cost domains
- Hold on to your stats! ShortDot gets two gTLDs approved in China
- CentralNic spends $6.5 million on traffic network
- Nothing but losses ahead for MMX
- Afilias appeals .web ruling, Verisign responds with “rigging” claims
- ICANN won’t vote on new gTLDs for another year
- ICANN now has half a billion bucks in the bank after huge pandemic profits
- Dead dot-brands top 100. Here’s the list and breakdown
- I had a stroke
- Volkswagen drives IDN dot-brand off a cliff
- CTO Conrad quits ICANN
- France gets more domain takedown powers
- MMX to return GoDaddy cash to investors
- Could registrars get sued under new Texas abortion law?
- DropCatch raises antitrust concerns about Donuts’ Dropzone proposal
- ICANN could get the ball rolling on next new gTLD round this weekend
- Domain industry SHRINKS again… except of course it doesn’t
- Toilet-maker’s dot-brand gets flushed
- Latest geo-gTLD goes to sunrise
- NameSilo says it’s growing too fast to be acquired
- Most registrars fail ICANN abuse audit
- More privacy headaches? UK to withdraw from GDPR
- Bizarre redactions in Pirate Bay founder’s ICANN registrar ban
- ICANN cuts the weekend from next public meeting
- DotKids signs very weird new gTLD contract
- Dropping domains might get more expensive at Donuts
- .sucks registry probably “connected” to mass cybersquatter, panel rules
- As Kabul falls, Whois could present a danger to ordinary Afghans
- Second-level .au names coming next March with tight deadline
- ICANN director picks for 2021 revealed
- Over 2,000 attendees for ICANN 73?
- .za back-end deal up for grabs
- ICANN spills beans on Marby’s million-dollar payday
- ICANN 73 will be “virtual first”
- Registrars to get more domain takedown powers
- Irish domain sales closely track pandemic restrictions
- MMX drops two registrars
- “Crimes against humanity” claims against Afilias
No more free transfers in Denmark
Kevin Murphy,
December 12, 2018, 10:45:45 (UTC),
Domain Services
The Danish ccTLD registry has announced that it is to introduce a charge for .dk transfers for the first time in January.
From the start of 2019, transfers between registrants will cost DKK 50 (about $7.50), DK Hostmaster said today.
Currently, transfers are free.
It appears that the new fee will be levied on the gaining registrant.
DK Hostmaster said that the fee is to cover “administrative costs”.
.dk has about 1.3 million domains under management.
No this is wrong, the transfer under there statement means trade of owner and are therefore not in line with other TLD’s.
This change will actually create the insane process that you have to pay for correcting wrong spelling in name or company name…
Benny,
I would respectfully disagree with you. Last year the ccTLD Manager implemented a Registrant verification process which resulted in a substantial reduction in IP infringement, in fact they have been recently given several awards for this change.
With regard to Registrants being charged for typos, I believe this would be highly unlikely given that DK Hostmaster has actually employed Registrant verification using digital identity, see https://www.dk-hostmaster.dk/en/id-check
This process involves the use of NimID for Denmark nationals (both Natural and Legal) see https://www.nemid.nu/dk-en/about_nemid/business/ and the use of a separate process for non-Denmark nationals, see https://www.dk-hostmaster.dk/sites/default/files/2017-12/Procedure%20for%20kontrol%20af%20kontaktoplysninger%20og%20id%20for%20reg%20med%20bopael%20udenfor%20DK_EN.pdf
Therefore I think the nominal charge of DKK 50 is not unreasonable to provide a more trusted zone within the .DK name space. In fact, it will be interesting to see if this verification process potentially helps mitigate instances of domain name hijacking.
There are other Registries that impose inter-registrant verification processes, e.g. fTLD in connection with .BANK and .INSURANCE. While fTLD I do not believe currently charge for these types of transfers, the wholesale price they charge is substantially higher than the more modest .DK fees.
I personally think this is a trend that is likely to continue to emerge across the broader domain name industry over time. While there are cynics that will likely claim that this is Registries looking to extract more fees from a declining/stable base of domain names, I personally view it as a positive step in creating a more secure, stable, and verified TLD space.
Best regards,
Michael
This verification you apparently think i so fantastic are only for people living in DK, anyone outside are not verified in that way.
So the fact is this, if a registrant outside of Denmark are going to correct the data on the “owner” it is treated as an owner change and you have to pay. Thats the process as it is today.
Do you honestly think this is fair?
So before you glorify this insanity maybe you should understand what the process are and the side effects of it. There are no cost for them it’s all done by the registrant in the self service portal. If you want registrants to keep there records up to date a fee for doing so are NOT the way to.
Hey Michael, thank you for you words…. but “Therefore I think the nominal charge of DKK 50 is not unreasonable to provide a more trusted zone within the .DK name space”
is for me totally different then what the Registry wrote: “administrative costs”
and then: to turn arround the argument: all ccTLDs that dont charge for a trade is an untrusted zone ?
i cant see a good reason to put a price on that in such short notice without – if a registry is arguing: there is not enough money, we need to higher the price.. its ok for me – lets talk…. but this is somehow – weird.
best regards
hagi
Charging 50 DKK for a change of ownership, well okay.
Charging 50 DKK to correct data seems to violate the accuracy principle of the GDPR.