Recent Posts
- .xyz back on sale in China
- puntCAT head of IT charged with “sedition”
- Spanish cops raid .cat registry offices in referendum censorship row
- Uniregistry: sales prices down for “first time ever”
- Okay, pedants, only 36% of new gTLDs are shrinking
- L’Oreal is using “closed generic” .makeup in an interesting way
- Four in 10 new gTLDs are shrinking
- Domain growth flat in Q2
- Another ccTLD plays down the “com”
- Will ICANN punt on .amazon again?
- MMX sells 7,000 domains for $3.4 million
- .CLUB HQ trashed by Irma, nobody hurt
- XYZ slashes $10 million a year from premium stash
- CentralNic extends XYZ deal until 2032
- Pilot program for Whois killer launches
- Hammock swings from Rightside to MarkMonitor
- Registry bosses to talk ICANN “tax cuts” at private meeting
- Another auDA director quit in secret
- .CLUB nears profitability, talks renewals and “trial” domains
- Deutsch and Doria to join ICANN board
- Afnic appoints Pierre Bonis new CEO
- After slow launch, .africa looks to add hundreds of resellers
- No $17 million rebate for struggling new gTLDs
- MMX: three gTLDs approved for sale in Beijing
- .museum soon could be open to all (no haters please)
- CentralNic promises $30 million .sk will only ever mean “Slovakia”
- Former MarkMonitor execs join new brand protection registrar
- Five million Indian government workers to get IDN email
- ZACR to delete 12,000 .za domains next week
- GoDaddy’s reason for dumping Uniregistry doesn’t make a lot of sense
- GoDaddy CEO to retire at 58
- Google shifts 400,000 .site domains
- Another auDA director quits after conflict claims
- Endurance losing founder-CEO next week
- Google dumps Nazi domain in hours
- GoDaddy kicks out neo-Nazi site after dead protester post
- Tucows revenue rockets after Enom buy
- GoDaddy domains business grows 15% in Q2
- Gay.com, “worth $7 million”, donated to gay blog
- Grumpy campaign claims victory after auDA U-turns
- Iran rep reported to ICANN Ombudsman, again
- .storage to have pricey second sunrise
- HTC dumps its dot-brand
- Halloran made ICANN’s first chief data protection officer
- Verisign confirms first price increase under new .net contract
- EFF recommends against new gTLDs
- auDA chair quits days before vote to fire him
- Crocker: no date on next new gTLD round
- Donuts to complete Rightside acquisition tonight
- MMX says .vip renewals running at 75%
Momentous’ .sucks bid “about creating dialogue”
The CEO of Momentous’ .sucks new gTLD applicant reckons smart brands will embrace the cheeky concept.
I chatted to John Berard, CEO of Momentous subsidiary Vox Populi Registry, this afternoon for a piece in The Register, and he reckons .sucks isn’t the money-grubbing scam many people will say it is.
“If some people think this is just a way to get registration money out of corporations, then those people are either unaware or are being short-sighted about their marketing effectiveness,” he said.
Berard believes smart companies nowadays are embracing social media interactions as a way to improve their marketing, and that .sucks will be a way to facilitate that.
That said, the policies governing .sucks are still not clear.
Momentous is also applying for .design, .rip and .style.
Kevin,
Thanks for putting DotSucks at the top of your list of newsworthy new gTLD applications.
I will grant you it may seem “cheeky,” but the rise of social media, the history of criticism occupying some dangerous Internet backwater and the importance of engagement make it all pretty sensible.
Specific provenance, light of day, dialog may just increase customer loyalty and improve corporate responsiveness. Win-win, eh?
As for the governing policies, we will be assiduous in protecting brands, vigilant in adherence to our terms and conditions and diligent in a take-down process that supports both.
Cheers,
John Berard
John, perhaps I’m a bit confused. Is your goal to sell domains like Dell.sucks to Dell? Or to individuals that want to gripe about Dell?
If the former, wouldn’t something like .feedback make more sense?
Andrew,
My hope is to create a dialog no matter who registers the name, but there will be trademarks deference built into the system.
As for the use of “sucks” over the more prosaic “feedback,” well, I think that is the reason. We need to get people’s attention so as to create the hub we intend. And cutting through the clutter of daily life requires taking some liberties with the language.
The test will be to see if consumers come to believe their comments are being heard and if companies come to rely on the registry to give them access to real points-of-view.
Watch this space!
Cheers,
John Berard
Same John Berard who represents the BC on the GNSO Council? If so, that seems relevant to me and an odd omission, IMHO.
It’s the same John Berard. I didn’t think his role on the Council was especially relevant here. Plenty of applicants and people representing applicants are on the Council.