Recent Posts
- GoDaddy flips hosting business for $456 million
- Domain growth slows a lot in Q1
- Governments slammed for overreach as Amazon wins gTLD appeal
- ICANN gives the nod to Donuts-Rightside merger
- Junk drop cuts .xyz in half, .top claims volume crown
- Over 750 domains hijacked in attack on Gandi
- ICANN chair paid $114,000 last year
- Could the next new gTLD round last 25 years? Or 70 years?
- auDA explains secretive new regime in bid to save chair
- Second-level .ke domains go on sale this month
- Billionaire Elon Musk reacquired x.com
- Domainers want the head of auDA’s chair
- ICANN expects to lose 750 registrars in the next year
- .blog renewal prices will not go up, registry promises
- ICANN shuffles regional bosses, drops “hub” concept
- .net price increases approved
- India to have SIXTEEN ccTLDs
- ICANN heading to Japan and Canada in 2019
- Uniregistry sale leads to BBC telling millions that domainers exist
- Cybersquatting cases down in .uk
- As .boots self-terminates, ICANN will not redelegate it
- GoDaddy launches security service after Sucuri acquisition
- Zero registrars pass ICANN audit
- Zone file access is crap, security panel confirms
- Ombudsman steps in after harassment claims in Whois group
- US “threatens” Costa Rica over Pirate Bay domains
- Forget emojis, you can buy Egyptian hieroglyph .com domains
- Donuts to pay $213 million for Rightside
- Bladel quits as Council chair as GoDaddy ruled “ineligible” for election
- Should ICANN get breastfeeding areas? Have your say!
- Domain President? Dicker fallout continues as Schwartz unleashes tweetstorm
- InternetNZ wants to fire two of its three (!) CEOs
- CIRA and Nominum offering DNS firewall
- DENIC gets approved for registry escrow
- ICANN scraps remote meeting hubs
- MMX says .vip renewals to be at 70%+
- About that $3,800 emoji domain sale…
- ICANN finds no conflict of interest in .sport decision
- .music and .gay CPE probe could end this month
- Time to show ICANN who’s boss!
- .xyz sets price for numeric domains at $0.65
- Sixteen-year-old emoji .com sells for €3,400
- $5 billion e-commerce site to dump .com for dot-brand
- Three-million-domain .au deal up for grabs
- Emoji domains get a 👎 from security panel
- Web.com in takeover talks – report
- After price hike, now Tucows drops support for Uniregistry TLDs
- Country names to finally be released in new gTLDs
- Want to be one of the internet’s SEVEN SECRET KEY-HOLDERS? Apply now!
- Richemont kills off two more dot-brands
Momentous’ .sucks bid “about creating dialogue”
The CEO of Momentous’ .sucks new gTLD applicant reckons smart brands will embrace the cheeky concept.
I chatted to John Berard, CEO of Momentous subsidiary Vox Populi Registry, this afternoon for a piece in The Register, and he reckons .sucks isn’t the money-grubbing scam many people will say it is.
“If some people think this is just a way to get registration money out of corporations, then those people are either unaware or are being short-sighted about their marketing effectiveness,” he said.
Berard believes smart companies nowadays are embracing social media interactions as a way to improve their marketing, and that .sucks will be a way to facilitate that.
That said, the policies governing .sucks are still not clear.
Momentous is also applying for .design, .rip and .style.
Kevin,
Thanks for putting DotSucks at the top of your list of newsworthy new gTLD applications.
I will grant you it may seem “cheeky,” but the rise of social media, the history of criticism occupying some dangerous Internet backwater and the importance of engagement make it all pretty sensible.
Specific provenance, light of day, dialog may just increase customer loyalty and improve corporate responsiveness. Win-win, eh?
As for the governing policies, we will be assiduous in protecting brands, vigilant in adherence to our terms and conditions and diligent in a take-down process that supports both.
Cheers,
John Berard
John, perhaps I’m a bit confused. Is your goal to sell domains like Dell.sucks to Dell? Or to individuals that want to gripe about Dell?
If the former, wouldn’t something like .feedback make more sense?
Andrew,
My hope is to create a dialog no matter who registers the name, but there will be trademarks deference built into the system.
As for the use of “sucks” over the more prosaic “feedback,” well, I think that is the reason. We need to get people’s attention so as to create the hub we intend. And cutting through the clutter of daily life requires taking some liberties with the language.
The test will be to see if consumers come to believe their comments are being heard and if companies come to rely on the registry to give them access to real points-of-view.
Watch this space!
Cheers,
John Berard
Same John Berard who represents the BC on the GNSO Council? If so, that seems relevant to me and an odd omission, IMHO.
It’s the same John Berard. I didn’t think his role on the Council was especially relevant here. Plenty of applicants and people representing applicants are on the Council.