Latest news of the domain name industry

Recent Posts

ICANN bans closed generic gTLDs, for now

Kevin Murphy, June 24, 2015, 09:28:31 (UTC), Domain Policy

ICANN has slapped a de facto ban on so-called “closed generic” gTLDs, at least for the remaining 2012 round applicants.

The ICANN board’s New gTLD Program Committee passed a resolution Sunday that un-freezes the remaining new gTLD applications that envisage a namespace wholly controlled by the applicant.

The affected strings are .hotels, .dvr and .grocery, which are uncontested, as well as .food, .data and .phone, which are contested by one or two other applicants.

The NGPC said five strings are affected, but the ICANN web site currently shows these six.

The resolution allows the contested strings to head to dispute resolution or auction, but makes it clear that “exclusive generic gTLDs” will not be able to sign a registry contract.

Instead, they will either have to withdraw their applications (receiving a partial refund), drop their exclusivity plans, or have their applications carried over to the second new gTLD round.

The GNSO has been asked to develop a policy on closed generics for the second round, which is still probably years away.

It’s not clear whether other applicants would be able to apply for strings that are carried over, potentially making the close generic applicant fight two contention sets.

The NGPC decision comes over two years after the Governmental Advisory Committee advised that closed generics must serve “a public interest goal” or be rejected.

This weekend’s resolution sidesteps the “public interest” question altogether.

Tagged: , , , ,

Comments (3)

  1. Rubens Kuhl says:

    .hotels is contested, belonging in a contention set with .hoteis. It’s the only other non-exact contention set besides the infamous .unicom/.unicorn where Unicom prevailed.

  2. Sam says:

    Good move, ICANN…close the barn door after all of the animals have left. How dot stupid.

Add Your Comment