Is digital archery bugged too?
ICANN’s digital archery system, which will be used to decide the fates of many new gTLD applicants, may have a bug, according to one applicant.
In a must-read post over on CircleID, Top Level Domain Holdings CEO Antony Van Couvering presents some intriguing evidence that ICANN’s system may be mis-recording timestamps.
Van Couvering hypothesizes that that when applicants’ clicks are recorded before their target time, the software records “the wrong seconds value, but with the right milliseconds value”.
He’s asked ICANN to look into the issue, and has added his voice to those clamoring for gTLD batching to be scrapped entirely.
With so many applicants using custom software to fire their arrows, millisecond differences will be hugely important.
However, as Van Couvering notes, ICANN does not plan to reveal applicants’ scores until July 11, so it’s impossible to tell if this alleged “bug” in the test suite is replicated in the live firing range.
The digital archery system uses the now-notoriously flawed TLD Application System.
JUNE 12 UPDATE:
In a follow-up post, Van Couvering reports, based on a conversation with ICANN, that the “bug” was indeed present, but that it was in the presentation layer, rather than the underlying database.
In other words, it was cosmetic and unlikely to influence the outcome of the batching process.













Recent Comments
I agree something the ombudsman should look into. However I will say sometimes leaders come into new companies and ne... read more
Then they should have withdrawn from the process as soon the risk of failing the evaluation was clear, like when they re... read more
If I were McKinsey I wouldn't want to disclose those financials, either. It's one of the places where the process wasn't... read more
"McKinsey & Company is a global management consulting firm. We are the trusted advisor to the world's leading busine... read more
The revolving door goes the other way too, with ICANN hiring people from applicants with leadership positions among them... read more
Any employee or other person who wishes to contact the ATRT confidentialy can do so at: confidential@atrt.info... read more
I think this is an important charge that will need to be taken seriously. Not only should the Board review this, perhaps... read more
The revolving door revolves...... read more
I should add that I have complaints that objections should not be accepted late, and that objections were not accepted b... read more
Furthermore, the DRSPs were supposed to complete the administrative reviews and inform applicants of the results within ... read more