Latest news of the domain name industry

Recent Posts

Debate as accuser names “sexual harasser”

Kevin Murphy, March 22, 2016, 18:26:09 (UTC), Domain Policy

The woman who says she was sexually harassed at the ICANN meeting in Marrakech earlier this month has controversially named the alleged perpetrator on a public mailing list.
She’s also publicly released documents exchanged between herself and the ICANN Ombudsman, with whom she has made a formal complaint.
According to her complaint the man, a longstanding and often vocal member of the ICANN community “approached me, pulled at my name tag, and passed inappropriate remarks.”
“I felt like my space and safety as a young woman in the ICANN community was at stake,” the complaint says.
No allegations of physical contact have been made, and the content of the “inappropriate remarks” has not been disclosed.
I’m not going to name either party here. They’re “the man” and “the woman” for now.
The woman has said on the mailing list in question that she’s waived her right to confidentiality.
I contacted the man for comment at the weekend and have not yet received a reply.
An email from Ombudsman Chris LaHatte, released by the woman, shows that he has spoken to the man.
The man said he could not recall the incident and LaHatte declined to tell him who his accuser was, for confidentiality reasons, the email says.
The release of the documents has sparked discussion on the mailing list and social media about whether publicly naming the man was the most appropriate course of action.
Inevitably, there’s also been some discussion about what constitutes sexual harassment.
The woman said she had already been engaged with LaHatte about the possibility of ICANN creating a sexual harassment policy, and that “this incident pushed me to take forward what had hitherto been a mere academic interest with increased vigour”.
She said in a released email predating Marrakech that during ICANN 54 last year, her first ICANN meeting, “I personally felt as though a few inappropriate remarks were made by certain male co attendees”.
When the woman initially made her allegations at the ICANN public forum, ICANN director Markus Kummer said the board had asked ICANN staff to look at possibly adjusting the longstanding Expected Standards Of Behavior to more specifically address sexual harassment.
“We clearly do not condone improper conduct of any kind such as harassment or otherwise and there should be zero tolerance for it within the community,” he said during the public forum.

Tagged: , , , ,

Comments (2)

  1. Reg says:
    March 23, 2016 at 12:35 am

    The fact that ICANN doesn’t already have a sexual harassment policy is a little baffling. Even 2-bit cons have that. Perhaps it’s expected that the Expected Standards of Behavior cover everything (and—they should, let’s be honest).
    Also, in the US, battery is an “offensive touching” and it needn’t be body-on-body. (If you grab the glasses off my face, even if your fingers never touch my face, that’s a battery.) So it may not be correct that “No allegations of physical contact have been made”.
    The conversation, however, which I’ve been watching on multiple platforms, has been endlessly enlightening.

    Reply

Add Your Comment