RodBeckstrom.xxx will never see the light of day
ICM Registry has reserved the names of dozens of ICANN directors, former directors and members of staff from the new .xxx top-level domain.
RodBeckstrom.xxx, it seems, is going to be permanently protected from cybersquatters.
I’ve reported before that thousands of celebrity names – about 4,300, it has since emerged – were placed into Registry Reserved status.
I can’t believe it did not occur to me until now to see if any domain industry “personalities” were also given the same preemptive protection.
It seems that every current member of the ICANN board has had their name reserved. One borderline case appears to be Ray Plzak, who’s only protected as RaymondAPlzak.xxx.
Two former ICANN directors who left the board this year – Peter Dengate Thrush and Rita Rodin Johnston – are also reserved, though Rita only as RitaRodin.xxx.
Further back, there’s spotty coverage. Raimundo Beca (left the board in 2010), former CEO Paul Twomey (2009) and Michael Palage (2006) have their names reserved, but many others have not.
Lots of ICANN staffers have been bestowed reserved status too, but again it appears to be quite random whether they’re included or not.
It does not appear to be based on rank (some VPs are excluded, but some mid-level employee names are reserved) or profile (some reserved names will be unfamiliar to anybody who does not attend ICANN meetings).
ICM has also reserved the names of all of its own employees.
I have been unable to find any big industry names from outside ICM and ICANN that are on the list. Bob Parsons is going to have to defensively register bobparsons.xxx, for example.
It’s worth noting that it’s against ICM’s rules to register any personal name under .xxx that is not the registrant’s own legal name or stage name, no matter what their intentions are.
Unlike .com, with .xxx registrants have to enter into an agreement with the registry – not just the registrar – when they buy a .xxx name.
It’s quite possible – though I’ve yet to confirm – that ICM will be able to disable any unauthorized personal name registered in .xxx without the offended party having to file an expensive claim.
And because registrants’ identities will be checked by ICM at the time of registration, even if they use Whois privacy, that should presumably be fairly easy to enforce in most cases.













Recent Comments
First and foremost, A wonderful article published on a tiny little nation, with some facts that could either be take... read more
Mikey, Yea, definitely like those Vertical Integration days... That was yet another mountain-out-of-a-molehill debat... read more
I interacted with Krista when I was Director of Policy Communications for ICANN, and also as ICANN's Director of Marketi... read more
Zack, you don't understand my argument since you are talking about taxes. If you believe the emporer has clothes, then ... read more
Not keeping me up. I actually understand the IRS rules, was just pointing out that your argument doesn't stand up.... read more
i think .LA as a cctld marketed worldwide is a reasonable investment, and its available now. I will probably make money... read more
Page, with all due respect, I thought you would be an advocate for new gTLDs, especially city TLDs given your investment... read more
.org.uk holders can hold .co.uk owners to ransom if they are older. free money for org.uk holders... read more
Since very little consideration was ever given to dissenting opinions about the entire concept of new tlds (the months a... read more
Basically anyone with .co.uks will have the opportunity to double their holdings and carrying costs...... read more