Recent Posts
- After 10 months, ICANN board “promptly” publishes its own minutes
- China yanks Daily Stormer domain after Buffalo mass shooting
- Fewer domain companies closing down than expected
- ICANN highlights “not getting things done” risk
- Another single-TLD brand protection service planned
- Dot Hip Hop slashes prices 80% in relaunch
- Three gTLDs to lose Donuts trademark protection
- Tucows to reanimate Tucows brand as sales flatten
- Blockchain domains pose “significant risks” to internet, says ICANN
- Russian registry hit with second breach notice after downtime
- Two countries could lose registrar competition after breach notices
- .tattoo — another UNR gTLD auction winner emerges
- Neustar now linked to scandal in the Catholic church
- SSAD: Whois privacy-busting white elephant to be shelved
- ICANN reports shocking increase in pandemic scams
- Kaufmann selected for ICANN board
- Secondary market fluffs GoDaddy amid slowdown concerns
- Washington DC picked for ICANN 77
- UDRP suspended in Ukraine
- Gee, thanks. auDA cuts price of .au names by five cents
- ICANN salary porn: 2021 edition
- A sign of things to come? Verisign slashes outlook in post-pandemic slowdown
- UDRP comments reveal shocking lack of trust in ICANN process
- CentralNic sees 51% growth in Q1
- Ukraine won’t delete domains until war is over
- Covid surge scuppers ICANN LA meetings
- Vox Pop defends its favorite cybersquatter
- ICANN picks recipient of $1 million Ukraine aid
- More friction over closed generics
- ICANN’s Covid-19 waiver formally appealed
- GoDaddy and XYZ sign away rights after UNR’s crypto gambit
- Verisign wipes free TLDs from the world stats
- ICANN picks 28 registries for abuse audit
- TMCH turning off some brand-blocking services
- Bye-bye Alice’s Registry
- .kids goes live, plans to launch this year
- ICANN suggests its Covid waiver may be worthless
- Domain sales exempt from US sanctions on Russia
- African Union can’t register .africa domain
- Microsoft seizes domains Russia was using to attack Ukraine
- Blacknight objects to ICANN 74 Covid waiver
- DNS Abuse Institute names free tool NetBeacon, promises launch soon
- Radix renewals drive growth as revenue hits $38 million
- GoDaddy formally signs .tv registry contract
- ICANN lists the reasons I probably won’t be going to ICANN 74
- A public apology for my April Fool’s blog post
- ICANN accidentally summons Lesser Old One in DNSSEC snafu
- ICANN “volunteers” want to get paid for sitting through pandemic Zoom calls
- War fails to stop .ua domains selling
- Marby pledges low red tape in $1 million Ukraine donation
- 2LDs boost .au’s growth
- With mystery auction winner, .sexy prices go from $25 to $2,500
- Ukraine registry hit by 57 attacks in a week
- ICANN says higher domain prices may be in the public interest
- .org price caps: ICANN chair denies “secret” meetings
- Nigeria slashes prices to compete with .com
- .au names available today
- GoDaddy acquires DNAcademy
- Google to launch a shopping-themed gTLD next week
- Another DNSSEC screw-up takes down thousands of .au domains
- XYZ bought most of Uniregistry’s TLDs
- What to make of this strange trend in new domain regs?
- EURid appoints new CEO
- Mutually assured destruction? Now Afilias faces .web disqualification probe
- Closed generic gTLDs likely to be allowed, as governments clash with ICANN
- 101domain throttles its business in Russia
- ICANN bigwigs support sanctions on Russian domains
- Soviet Union “no longer considered eligible for a ccTLD”, ICANN chair confirms
- Nominet cuts off Russian registrars
- Now Sedo pulls the plug on Russians
- DNSSEC claims another victim as entire TLD disappears
- Ukraine’s emotional plea to ICANN 73
- ICANN extends Covid-19 abuse monitoring to Ukraine war
- ICANN’s Ukraine relief may extend to Russians too
- ICANN offers $1 million to Ukraine projects, supports Ukrainian registrants
- Here’s a way ICANN could actually help the people of Ukraine
- GoDaddy stops selling .ru domains, commits money to support Ukraine
- Gandi says it supports Ukraine but WON’T cut off Russians
- Now IONOS kicks out Russian customers
- ICANN says NO to Ukraine’s Big Ask
- Namecheap offers free services to Russian dissidents
- CENTR kicks out Russia
- Ukraine asks ICANN to turn off Russia’s internet, but it’s a bad idea
- Namecheap boss goes nuclear on Russian customers
- Noss pressures bankers, lawyers over Russian oligarch links
- As Russia advances on Kyiv, .ua moves out-of-country
- Maybe now’s the time for ICANN to start dismantling the Soviet Union
- Cybersquatting cases down in .uk
- GoDaddy among five companies competing for .za contract
- Registrar hit with second porn UDRP breach notice this year
- Costa Rica’s only registrar gets terminated
- GoDaddy Registry to raise some TLD prices, lower others
- Supreme Court allows fight for .nu to proceed
- Liberties group appeals NIXI’s “two domains rule” brush-off
- ICANN stuck between Ukraine and Russia in time zone debate
- Greek .eu domains to be deleted
- UDRP cases soar at WIPO in 2021
- CentralNic buys a gTLD and a search engine for peanuts
- “It’s not our fault!” — ICANN blames community for widespread delays
- PIR to offer industry FREE domain abuse clearinghouse
- GoDaddy now making over $1 billion a quarter
- Post-lockdown blues hit Tucows’ growth
- Surprising nobody, Verisign to raise .com prices again
- Verisign and PIR join new DNS abuse group
- auDA ramps up marketing for direct .au launch
- Thousands of domains hit by downtime after DNSSEC error
- Is the .sucks mass-cybersquatting experiment over?
- At ICANN, you can have any registrar you want, as long as it begins with A
- .eu grows in Q4 after silly growth in Portugal
- Turkish registrar on the naughty step over abuse
- Court denies .sucks trademark bid
- ICANN hasn’t implemented a policy since 2016
- Satirists register Joe Rogan domain to promote Covid vaccines
- Do young people know how to use domain names?
- “GDPR is not my fault!” — ICANN fears reputational damage from Whois reform
- Cahn says .hiphop premiums could show up at auction next month
- No SSAD before 2028? ICANN publishes its brutal review of Whois policy
- ICANN board not happy with $100 million Whois reform proposals
- Over 6,000 Brexit domains snapped up after mass delete
- Verisign saw MASSIVE query spike during Facebook outage
- .xxx shows up in botnet top-five TLDs for the first time
- ICANN splits $9 million new gTLD ODP into nine tracks
- “We fell short” — Tucows says sorry for Enom downtime
- Crain named ICANN CTO
- Bank spends $800,000 to move from a .bank to the exact-match .com
ICANN tries to limit rogue registrars
As part of its growing efforts to clean up the domain name registrar market, ICANN has introduced background checks for companies applying for accreditation.
ICANN will check criminal and financial records, as well as doing credit checks, on companies that want to be able to sell domains in gTLDs.
As a result, the cost of applying to become a registrar is going up by $1,000, to $3,500, to cover the cost of accessing the relevant third-party databases.
The changes, made largely at the behest of law enforcement participants in ICANN, concerned that some registrars are not what you’d call responsible netizens, come into effect July 1.
The intellectual property lobby had called for the checks to include cybersquatting and UDRP judgements, but those suggestions were not taken on board.
Related posts (automatically generated):
Are Whois email checks doing more harm than good?
Domain registrars pressured into huge shakeup
ICANN offers to split the cost of GAC “safeguards” with new gTLD registries
Tagged: ICANN, law enforcement
What about Registrars known to shelter malware sites? Serving malware goes against the Registrar/user agreement . . . If Registrars shelter instead of censure malware-servers, would that not qualify as criminal?
What if the Registrar itself serves malware?
http://google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=bizcn.com
(Smells like a Godaddy “affiliate.”) Think I’ll be needing to send another missive to Larry Strickling . . .
Great post as always Kevin, but there’s ONE problem. ICANN was supposed to be doing this all along and told me years ago they did this procedure for each Registrar already.
This validates our claim that they haven’t been vetting Registrars at all (except validating the fee check$!)
@Louise, we’ve got documented cases of BizCn violating ICANN rules in order to keep malware sites ACTIVE. Where’s the breach notice?
Garth Bruen seems to be right–as I would expect him to be (I have an account with”Knujon”)–it seemed to me that Internet Service Providers might also be held more responsible for bot-nets involving them and especially so when their clients are the exclusive or main victims of the bot-net. I might add that the Federal Government might have done much more of a, and a better job, administrating. It seems that the Office of Homeland Security left its administrative position with such responsibilities open for two years.
People in the anti-war and pacifist communities have experienced getting viruses after viewing cyber-squater’s replica web site, while replica FBI web pages contain information as to how to avoid spam and malware as it “phishs” for personal information from Nigeria, etc.; and what was done about the “Trojan Horse” “XP 2008”–“XP 2009”, which the New York Times reported on and promised a report in 2008? Considering the magnitude of the problem we are ten years behind the presenting problems themselves–it is as if every city would liquidate their police forces and tell
tell everyone to get a security guard. Steve
It’s been 2 years and yet BizCN continues to operate as usual. A registrant of BizCN has been using my email address to forge headers so that it appears I am sending the emails – which are a scam. The only domain name associated with the actual sender appears in a contact email address in the text message.
I’ve repeatedly reported this abuse of my email address to BizCN and point out that the whois data for domain in the contact email doesn’t appear legit because the information for the physical address (street name and number, city, state, postal code and even country) and telephone number do not coincide. I also point out that there is no website associated with the domain, but now the registrant creates a new domain each week with different (falsified) contact information.
The registrant initially used Regtime, but Regtime appears to have closed, at least temporarily, the fraudulent domains and has not allowed the owner to register any more domains. Okay, so the scammer has gotten a little more clever but I would think that registrars would be required to verify the whois contact information. Of course, BizCN is all too willing to close each domain when someone complains so that the registrant can then purchase a new domain or domains.
How do I contact ICANN to report BizCN to them?