ICANN’s “review of reviews” kicks off

The ICANN community has kicked off its “review of reviews”, a hopefully brief exercise in navel-gazing designed to free ICANN from even more navel-gazing over the longer term.

The seven supporting organizations and advisory committees have put forth a proposal, which ICANN’s top brass has accepted, for a Review of Reviews Cross Community Group (RoR CCG) that will seek to rescue ICANN from the quagmire of introspection into which it has sunk in recent years.

ICANN’s bylaws, written when the Org got divorced from the US government a decade ago, call for more than half a dozen reviews — of stuff like accountability, competition, security and Whois — most of which are on five-year cycles.

But the institutional lethargy that has consumed ICANN for the last decade, coupled with an already heavy volunteer workload, has meant that the reviews sometimes miss deadlines and still haven’t been fully implemented by the time the next cycle comes around.

The new CCG is being set up to see what can be done to terminate this vicious cycle. A charter document (pdf) sent to ICANN this week reads:

The purpose of the CCG is to manage a fundamental evaluation of the following reviews set out in the ICANN Bylaws, as a whole system, including their implementation, and propose a refreshed system of reviews.

Its timeline is ambitious. The group hopes to have some proposals ready to show the community by ICANN 86, less than a year from now. By ICANN standards that’s pretty much Ludicrous Speed.

The CCG will have a limited membership: two members from each SO and AC, two ICANN staffers and two members of the board for a total of 18. Anyone will be able to passively observe the mailing list and teleconferences.

The draft CCG charter has been accepted by ICANN chair Tripti Sinha. It’s expected that the group will hold public sessions this October in Dublin at ICANN 84.

1 Comment Tagged: ICANN, review of reviews

Huge registrars flee from RDRS

Ten notable domain registrars have abandoned ICANN’s pilot Registration Data Request Service, substantially reducing its usefulness.

In June, 10 accredited registrars pulled their support for the voluntary service, which is designed to give law enforcement, IP owners, and security researchers an easier way to request unredacted Whois records.

Team Internet is out, taking with it its registrars 1API, Internet BS, Key-Systems GmbH, Key-Systems LLC, Moniker, RegistryGate and TLD Registrar Solutions.

Newfold Digital exited with Network Solutions, Register․com, and PublicDomainRegistry․com.

The sum of all this is that there are now 78 participating registrars, compared to 88 at the end of May, and they now only represent 47% of all registered gTLD domains, down from 54%.

That’s the lowest level of participation since RDRS launched in late November 2023 and the first time it’s dropped below half of all registered gTLD domains.

Usage of RDRS has dropped to a whole new low. There were only 68 requests for Whois records in June, down from the previous low of 91 in March.

Perhaps counter-intuitively, the number of searches that resulted in “Registrar Not Supported” errors remained static at 16%, tying for the lowest ratio across the entire pilot to date.

ICANN’s Governmental Advisory Committee recently said it wants ICANN to consider making RDRS mandatory for all registrars.

Aug 7 Correction: this article originally erroneously stated that Corporation Service Company had removed one registrar and added another. In fact, the registrar in question had simply changed its name. I apologise for the error.

3 Comments Tagged: ICANN, newfold, rdap, rdrs, team internet, whois

Namecheap loses attempt to bring back .org price caps

ICANN seems to have won a big victory in its ongoing tussle with Namecheap over price caps for .org and .info domains.

A California court ruled late last week that it cannot force ICANN into pricing talks with the registries for the two gTLDs, denying a motion that Namecheap filed back in April.

The dispute dates back to 2019, when ICANN removed price caps from Public Interest Registry’s .org registry contract, which had limited PIR to 10% annual increases.

Namecheap used ICANN’s own Independent Review Process accountability mechanism to challenge this decision and won, kinda, in 2022.

The IRP panel found ICANN had breached its bylaws and issued “recommendations” such as commissioning an economic report into price caps, deciding if price caps should return, and if so then talking to the registries about bringing them back.

When there’d been little action by early 2024, Namecheap sued to get the backing of the court for the IRP decision. It was successful, with the court ruling this February that the IRP findings were valid.

In the meantime, ICANN had obtained its economist’s report and passed a resolution stating that it should not bring price caps back to the two registry contracts.

But Namecheap had a final crack at getting the court to force ICANN into price cap. In a motion this April, it asked the court to instruct ICANN to “approach the registry operators for .ORG and .INFO to agree to some form of price control”.

The court didn’t buy its arguments, however, last week denying Namecheap’s requests on the grounds that ICANN had in fact considered the IRP panel’s recommendations:

Namecheap provides evidence that ICANN in fact did consider the Panel’s recommendations, and thus Plaintiff admits that ICANN did not reject any of the Panel’s findings, so as correctly stated by ICANN, “there is nothing for this Court to enforce.”

In the six years since the price caps were lifted, non-profit PIR has not raised .org prices, while for-profit Identity Digital has raised .info prices every year, from $10.84 in 2019 to $19 today.

Comment Tagged: .info, .org, ICANN, identity digital, irp, lawsuit, namecheap, pir, price caps, pricing

Registrar shamed for alleged crypto abuse neglect

ICANN has given a warning to Malaysian registrar WebNic, claiming that it has turned a blind eye to abuse reports in breach of new Registrar Accreditation Agreement rules.

ICANN Compliance says the company, a subsidiary of Kuala Lumpur-based Qinetics, failed to take action to resolve abuse reports made against several domains it manages.

Online reports and databases suggest the names in question were used in phishing attacks attempting to steal cryptocurrency wallet credentials.

Compliance said it “has observed a concerning pattern regarding DNS Abuse mitigation”, saying WebNic continually drags its feet on responding to abuse reports, often only taking action after ICANN gets involved.

The breach notice adds:

The Registrar frequently issued repeated requests for evidence to abuse reporters – even when the original reports appeared actionable – and failed to fully consider information or clarifications provided by the abuse reporter, ICANN or otherwise reasonably accessible to the Registrar. In other cases, the Registrar requested evidence from the abuse reporters that did not appear to be relevant to the reported activity, causing additional delays.

WebNic is not a young, fly-by-night registrar. It’s been around a quarter century and has over 800,000 domains under management just in the gTLDs. Its parent also offers registry back-end services.

The company has until August 19 to make Compliance happy or risk termination proceedings.

Comment Tagged: abuse, breach, compliance, ICANN, phishing, webnic

Poblete’s ICANN board seat safe

Patricio Poblete seems set to serve a third and final term on ICANN’s board of directors, after nobody else put themselves forward as an alternative.

Poblete, of Chilean ccTLD registry NIC Chile, was nominated to continue in the role as one of the two ccNSO representatives on the board after his current term expires October 2026.

Nobody else stepped up as an alternative, so Poblete now appears to be a shoo-in, assuming he passes due diligence. The ccNSO said “if only one candidate is nominated, no election is required”.

His third term would end in late 2029.

Comment Tagged: board, ccnso, election, ICANN

.com off to strong start in Q3

Verisign’s .com gTLD had a relatively strong showing in the first month of the third quarter, its zone file growing by over half a million domains.

The TLD had 155,946,391 names in its zone at the start of August, up 526,205 names or 0.34% on the start of July.

For comparison, the zone grew by 464,822 names in June, 795,533 in the whole of Q2 and 817,590 in the whole of Q1.

Other strong volume performers in July were cheapo new gTLDs .xyz and .top, which grew by 257,830 domains (5.63%) to 4,840,663 and 224,816 domains (5.2%) to 4,547,051 respectively.

In percentage terms, the biggest growers were .casa, up 82.83% or 14,974 domains to 33,051, .mobi, up 47.05% or 121,174 domains to 378,703 and .help, up 39.55% or 22,513 domains to 79,275.

In raw domain terms, the biggest losers in zone file growth in July were .lol (down 97,718 to 294,656), .sbs (down 42,169 to 839,977) and .bond (down 37,845 to 150,272).

Of the 1,194 TLDs for which I currently have monthly growth stats, about 250 shrank, about 420 grew, and the rest (largely dot-brands or unlaunched generics) were flat.

1 Comment Tagged: .com, stats, verisign

.my is growing like crazy

Malayasia’s .my ccTLD has almost doubled in size since the start of the year, likely due to rule liberalizations and steep discounts at leading registrars.

MYNIC, the local registry, is reporting 675,607 domains under management at the end of July. That’s up 165,061 or 32% on the 510,546 reported at the end of June.

A total of 523,218 were direct second-level .my registrations, up from 350,441. DUM in third-level spaces such as .com.my and .net.my were all flat or slightly down over the month.

.my started the year with 342,326 domains. The TLD has grown 97% since then. All the growth has been at the second level.

The surge is likely due to a combination of factors — that the ccTLD has only recently dropped its local residency requirements, and that some international registrars have discounted .my to bargain-bin prices.

MYNIC signed a deal with Internet Naming Co and Tucows last year that would see .my names registerable by non-Malaysian registrants, but it was not immediately successful.

MYNIC had hoped to hit 400,000 domains by the end of 2024. It ended up taking until April 2025 to hit that milestone.

Registrars such as Namecheap and Gabia are currently selling .my for around $2 for the first year, a heavy cut from the roughly $50 they usually retail for. Porkbun has gone as low as $1.34, which it says is cost price.

But renewals will hit at full price for the second year, meaning the current growth spurt may not be sustainable.

Comment Tagged: .my, mynic

ICANN settles $77 million sexual harassment suit

ICANN has settled another sexual harassment lawsuit filed against it by a former employee.

An ICANN spokesperson said the case, filed last August by 22-year meetings-team veteran Tanzanica King, “has been resolved”. King did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

King had asked for $77 million in damages, approximately half of ICANN’s annual budget, alleging she was the victim of a widespread “frat boy culture” that contributed to her being sexually harassed by her boss, passed over for promotions, and paid less than male colleagues.

The settlement, any financial component of which will no doubt be for a tiny fraction of what was demanded, seems to have come just a few weeks after ICANN lost its attempt to get the case thrown out and referred instead to arbitration.

A Los Angeles judge in June ruled that King was protected by a post-#MeToo law, the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act (EFAA), even though her employment contract dated back to 2002.

ICANN said last year that the allegations were “untrue” and that it “strives to create a positive, safe, and inclusive work and community environment, and is committed to the highest possible standards of ethical, moral, and legal business conduct.”

It’s at least the third time ICANN has had to settle sexual harassment suits in recent years.

2 Comments Tagged: ICANN, lawsuit, sexual harassment

Chinese domain spikiness ends in first half

China’s typically lumpy .cn domain market seemed to stabilize in the first half of 2025, posting modest growth rather than wild fluctuations.

While local registry CNNIC does not seem to have published its full H1 statistical report yet, it said in a press release this week that the were 20.85 million .cn domains registered at the end of June.

That compares to the 20.82 million names it had at the end of 2024, representing basically flattish growth.

In previous quarters, the world’s second-largest TLD had seen its numbers all over the shop, with growth of 1.2 million names in H224 and a dip of 563,000 in H124.

CNNIC said the total number of domains registered in China was 32.62 million. No further breakdowns were available.

Comment Tagged: .cn, cnnic

Registrars agree to higher ICANN fees

Domain registrars have agreed to pay more in ICANN fees, after a supermajority vote.

ICANN said today that registrars representing over two thirds of fees voted in favor of the increases, part of a package which Org reckons will add $4.6 million to its annual budget at first.

The package of increases also comes with an increase of the per-transaction fee, typically added by registrars at the checkout and sometimes called the “ICANN tax”, from $0.18 per domain to $0.20.

But the vote related to the variable fees, which will now go up from $3.42 million to $3.8 million per year. That sum is split equally between registrar accreditations, with a deep two-thirds discount for registrars with under 350,000 domains.

The fixed annual $4,000 per-accreditation fee is not changing.

The increases were proposed last October, along with registry fee increases, to plug budget shortfalls caused by macroeconomic factors such as inflation, lumpy registration patterns, and the post-Covid slump in registered names.

These are the first price increases ICANN has implemented in well over a decade.

1 Comment Tagged: budget, fees, ICANN