Amazon delays book and fashion gTLDs

Two gTLD launches pencilled in for next month seem to have been delayed a year.

Amazon Registry has filed updated launch dates for two Japanese-language TLDs: .書籍 (.xn--rovu88b), meaning “book”, and .ファッション (.xn--bck1b9a5dre4c), meaning “fashion”.

Both had been previously scheduled to go to general availability in early November, but new dates published by ICANN have pushed both back to the same dates in 2026.

Both have already completed their mandatory sunrise periods, back in late 2016. If they do go GA next year, it will have been a full decade between trademark protection and free-for-all.

Amazon has been slowly releasing its long-dormant stockpile of gTLDs recently. Three — .you, .talk and .fast — went GA earlier this month. Three others — .free, .hot and .spot — launched in the first half of the year.

Comment Tagged: .xn--bck1b9a5dre4c, .xn--rovu88b, .ファッション, .書籍, amazon, new gTLDs

Lindqvist shuffles the exec deck

I’ve never really understood the logic of ICANN having contractual compliance and government relations under the same roof, but it’s an organizational strategy it’s doubled down on in its latest rejigger.

CEO Kurt Lindqvist said that he’s given Jamie Hedlund a new title and new department. He’s now senior VP of global government engagement and contractual compliance, which expands on his previous US-only remit.

The Org has hired long-time community participant Janis Karklins as head of government engagement, replacing interim head Veni Markovski. He will report to Hedlund.

Karklins’ biggest contribution in recent years was arguably chairing the group that advanced post-GDRP Whois policy, but he has also acted in multiple ambassadorial roles for Latvia.

Separately, Andre Abed has been promoted to CIO, a role he held on an interim basis since Ashwin Rangan quit almost two years ago. He will report to CTO John Crain.

Comment Tagged: ICANN

GoDaddy launches “ultra-premium” domain marketplace

If you’re going to launch a marketplace for “ultra-premium” domain names, you couldn’t pick a better domain to launch it on than DomainNames.com, and that’s what GoDaddy has done.

Via its Afternic secondary market business, the site was officially announced today. GoDaddy is reaching out to investors who own a “category-defining .com, a rare two-letter gem, a single-word .com or .ai, or a numeric masterpiece”.

While the company says it’s invitation-only, it it’s also asking investors to submit their names for consideration via a form on the new site, so that’s probably only half-accurate.

It’s looking for names it reckons could fetch six-figure asking prices and above.

If you want to know what GoDaddy thinks is “ultra-premium”, consider that the 110 domain names listed at launch are almost exclusively one–English-word or two-character .com names, with a handful of one-word .ai domains thrown in.

Domains will be actively marketed by the service and sellers have to sign an exclusivity agreement with GoDaddy.

That said, the domains don’t seem to have custom landers. Visitors to the listed names are greeted with a variety of Afternic/GoDaddy parking pages, some of which even have buy-it-now prices listed.

Comment Tagged: domainnames.com, godaddy

.mobi to get a new rival in .mobile

There’s a new registry player in town. Dish DBS is preparing to launch the .mobile gTLD, which has been dormant for almost a decade, according to notes on its web site.

The first phase of the launch — sunrise — has been pencilled in for 30 days from November 10. If ICANN’s been informed of the launch dates, it has not yet officially published them on its own web site.

The launch plan would see a limited registration period targeting mobile phone operators running until early February. That would be followed by a 12-day Early Access Period and a February 19 general availability launch.

The plan is to have .mobile a fully open unrestricted space positioned as a “modern, mobile-first domain extension designed for life in motion – perfect for creators, startups, professionals, and forward-thinking brands.”

I’m expecting this to be the first of several launches from Dish, which has been sitting on a portfolio of a dozen gTLDs — the others are .sling, .dish, .latino, .dot, .ott, .ollo, .blockbuster, .dtv, .dvr, .phone, and .data — from the 2012 round.

Dish seems to be deep in bed with Tucows, its back-end registry services partner, on the revitalized portfolio.

The launch of .mobile of course will be viewed in the context of .mobi almost two decades ago, which was hyped at a time of gTLD scarcity and heavily speculated.

Now under Identity Digital, .mobi peaked at over 1.2 million registered domains in 2013 but has been in a death spiral ever since as investors cut their losses. It now sits at around 265,000 domains.

The original plan for .mobi, which was applied for four years before the launch of the first iPhone, was to provide a namespace where phone users could be assured that a site would be compatible with their phones. It looks incredibly naive in hindsight.

Dish did not have the same idea for .mobile. It wanted .mobile as a single-registrant space where only itself and its affiliates could register names, but that plan was scuppered when ICANN retroactively banned such models.

1 Comment Tagged: .mobi, .mobile, dish dbs, launch, new gTLDs, sunrise, tucows

Bye-bye .boomer! Blockchain players abandon new gTLD plans

A dozen organizations that were planning to apply to ICANN for a new gTLD next year have abandoned their ambitions.

Unstoppable Domains said recently that 12 partners offering blockchain-based alt-TLDs have confirmed they no longer expect to apply for a matching gTLD when the Next Round opens next year.

The affected blockchain extensions are: .bald, .basenji (formerly .benji), .bay, .boomer, .calicoin, .caw, .cgai, .donut, .mery, .mumu, .nibi and .pendle.

Because some buyers may have hoped to grab the matching DNS domain if and when the matching gTLD got delegated, Unstoppable said it will offer refunds to anyone who registered a name in any of these extensions.

It’s also added “Applying to ICANN 2026” and “Not applying to ICANN 2026” tags to search results on its storefront.

The refunds don’t apply to alt-TLDs that could never have applied to ICANN because the string breaks the rules in some way (for example being numeric or too short).

Comment Tagged: blockchain, ICANN, new gTLDs, unstoppable

Decades-old US registrar gets a spanking

ICANN Compliance has filed a wide-ranging breach notice against an American registrar that’s been accredited for over 20 years.

Cincinnati-based Netdorm, which does business as DnsExit.com, has been handed a long list of alleged contract violations and an October 16 deadline to fix things or risk termination.

As we’ve seen regularly recently, the registrar’s apparent failures to carry out the technical migrations from Whois to RDAP and from NCC Group to DENIC for escrow services are the biggest of ICANN’s concerns.

Netdorm is also past-due on its fees and has a long checklist of administrative and transparency failures, according to the Compliance breach notice.

Despite being accredited since 2004, the company has been chugging along with fewer than 6,000 gTLD domains under management for many years. It gives away third-level subdomains for free and claims to run over a million of them.

Comment Tagged: breach, compliance, dnsexit, ICANN, netdorm

love.you sold in apparent five-figure deal

The domain name love.you has been sold by Amazon Registry for what was probably more than $30,000, during what so far has been a bit of a disappointing launch for the .you gTLD.

love.you is the only domain currently showing up in .you’s zone file that has a creation date after 1300 UTC on September 25, the moment Amazon opened its latest Early Access Periods.

It was registered about half an hour after the EAP opened last Thursday.

The first-day EAP application fee was $10,000. If love.you was listed as a top-tier premium domain, which seems likely, that would have added an extra $20,000 to the sale price, and that’s before registrar 101domain applied its retail markup.

It’s the only EAP registration in .you so far, judging by the zone. Amazon is currently also running EAPs for .talk and .fast, but zone files suggest it hasn’t made any sales in those gTLDs yet.

The three TLDs are having unusually long EAPs — 11 days versus the usual five — with wholesale prices ranging from $10,000 on day one to $100 on day 11, before premium fees are applied.

Full general availability at standard pricing will begin October 6, with prices likely to be about $20 to $30 a year.

Comment Tagged: .fast, .talk, .you, amazon, eap, new gTLDs

Bogus harassment complaints could get you an ICANN ban

ICANN has made it a lot easier for its community members to file spurious harassment complaints against each other, but has also made it clear it will not put up with such complaints.

A new version of the Community Anti-Harassment Policy has been approved and is now in effect, with some new text arguably creating a chilling social minefield where a simple cultural faux pas could lead to formal disciplinary action.

But it also warns against “submitting vexatious and/or spurious complaints”, saying such complainants could wind up with the same penalties as those found to have actually engaged in harassment.

Punishments include everything from a demand for a verbal apology to a lifetime ban from the ICANN community.

The core definition of harassment has been updated to add the word “discriminatory”. It is now: “Harassment is unwelcome, non-consensual, hostile, discriminatory, and/or intimidating conduct.”

The policy continues to state, unchanged: “Conduct does not have to intend to harm, be directed at a specific target, or involve repeated incidents in order for it to be deemed harassment.”

The list of examples of prohibited conduct has been clarified and updated, with some surprising changes.

The new policy (pdf), an update to the original 2017 policy (pdf) prohibits “physical assault, or threats” for — bafflingly — the first time. It gives the Ombuds the ability help the recipient of any criminal action coordinate with local police if necessary.

It also now bans “offensive comments”, with “offensive” defined as “any language, actions, or imagery that cause hurt, discomfort, or distress to an individual or group, particularly when demeaning, disrespectful, or discriminatory”.

The new policy also makes it clear that its jurisdiction extends outside the windowless walls of ICANN meeting venues, in particular to “dinners or social gatherings in connection with an ICANN Public Meeting”.

It now also bans “micro-aggressive or passive-aggressive remarks that reinforce stereotypes”. This could be worrying, given that ICANN, in typically humorless Californian fashion, considers things like weak handshakes or smiles “microaggressions”.

But the new policy does have a safeguard against overzealous culture warriors filing nonsense complaints for nefarious reasons. It says:

this Policy is not itself to be used for the purposes of retaliation. Persons who abuse this Policy by submitting vexatious and/or spurious complaints or reports shall be dealt with in an appropriate fashion…

A vexatious complaint is one made maliciously, knowingly false, or with the intent to harass, intimidate, or retaliate against another individual.

In all cases, complaints under the policy are handled by the Ombuds, who will attempt to resolve the situation informally between the parties concerned before escalating to any formal punitive actions.

Confidentiality is expected at all stages, but the policy says ICANN Org will be informed if ICANN staff are involved.

1 Comment Tagged: harassment, ICANN

ICANN slaps open-mic ban on conflicted lawyers

Lawyers who refuse to disclose the identities of their clients should no longer be able to take the mic at ICANN’s regular Public Forum sessions, under a new ban.

The Org’s board has approved a new code of conduct covering people who get involved in policy-making processes or contribute to public discussions, which essentially tells them to reveal their paymasters or go away.

The new code says that “withholding relevant information about the interests involved” could “impair the legitimacy of ICANN’s processes” and that when “disclosure cannot be made, the participant must not participate in ICANN processes or make interventions at ICANN sessions on that issue.”

The new rules mean that if a lawyer working on new gTLD policy is secretly on the payroll of a potential new gTLD applicant, or if a client is working on a patent that could be affected by policy, they should either disclose that relationship or recuse themselves.

The policy has been under development for about a year and a half, following advice from ICANN’s Governmental Advisory Committee. It was open for public discussion and comment and some suggested changes have been adopted.

Opponents said that sometimes lawyers in private practice are ethically prohibited from revealing their clients’ names, but this was pooh-poohed by others who pointed out that jurisdictions such as the US require similar disclosures from lobbyists.

ICANN already had a code of conduct for volunteers, but it included a carve-out for people claiming professional ethical immunity.

Anyone found to have violated the new code of conduct could find themselves banned from participating in ICANN policy-making processes.

Comment Tagged: code of conduct, conflicts, ICANN, sois

Final GTFO warning for 19 failed new gTLD bids

ICANN is to give eviction notices to the applicants behind 19 failed new gTLD applications from the 2012 round, including Google, Amazon and Identity Digital. The affected strings include .hotel, .shop and .islam.

Fifteen companies are to be told to withdraw their applications within 90 days or forfeit their right to a partial refund of their application fees, under a Termination Procedure approved by ICANN earlier this month.

The affected applications include those for strings that have since been delegated to other applicants, strings that were rejected due to objections from governments, and those that failed because of clashes with ICANN rules.

They also include .corp, .mail and .home, applied for by Google, Amazon, and GMO Registry, which have been banned due to the high risk of name collisions with commonly used behind-the-firewall namespaces.

Eight further applications — for .webs, .web and .gcc — are deemed to have failed but will not immediately get their 90-day warning because they are still involved in legal proceedings.

The absolute minimum amount of refunds at stake here is $703,000 — 20% of the original fees — which would remain in ICANN’s coffers if it remains unclaimed after the deadline.

Comment