Recent Posts
- Yanks beat Aussies to accountancy gTLD
- Surprise! Most private Whois look-ups come from Facebook
- Google launches .dev with some big-name anchor tenants
- The internet is about to get a lot gayer
- Claims UDRP has cost over $360 million so far
- Ironic eight-figure deal marks more Euro-registrar consolidation
- Court rules generic dictionary domains CAN be trademarked
- ICANN director Burr leaving Neustar
- Right of the colon? IDN getting killed over dot confusion
- Despite Afilias lawsuit, Neustar names date for Indian takeaway
- Endurance domain revenue dips
- After ICANN knockback, Amazon countries agree to .amazon talks
- Operation September Thrust leads to another million-domain Radix gTLD
- Brexit blamed as .eu hits six-year low
- CentralNic expects flat profit as revenue almost doubles
- XYZ reveals .monster gTLD launch dates
- Huge batch of Afilias TLDs approved in China
- .SE sells off $3.2 million registrar biz
- ICANN picks Seattle for public meeting
- ICANN approves two new TLDs, including THAT one
- MMX sees better profits than expected
- Pay up or sell up, ICANN tells failing new gTLD
- Brexit boost for Irish domains
- Brexit won’t just affect Brits, .eu registry says
- New domain price guessing game warns against “asshole domain squatters”
- Nazis rejoice! A TLD for you could be coming soon
- ICANN creates female-heavy anti-harassment team
- ICANN chief gets $100k bonus
- ICANN puts deadline on .amazon talks
- Crunch Whois privacy talks kick off
- Another failing gTLD not paying its “onerous” dues
- .CLUB announces three years of price increases
- How new gTLD auctions could kill gaming for good
- .amazon domain isn’t a slam dunk after all
- Chile opens .cl to all ICANN registrars
- “Please send women!” ICANN board urges
- NamesCon names con speakers
- Dark horse NameSilo doubles size in 2018
- UK tells .eu registrants to lawyer up as no-deal Brexit looms
- Radix now has China approval for whole TLD stable
- The most-read stories of 2018
- Another bundle of joy for XYZ as Johnson & Johnson throws out the .baby
- Now even parked domains will have GDPR notices
- ICANN budget predicts small new gTLD recovery and slowing legacy growth
- Verisign says Afilias tried to “rig” $135 million .web auction
- Exclusive gang of 10 to work on making ICANN the Whois gatekeeper
- Governments blast ICANN over Amazon gTLDs
- No more free transfers in Denmark
- ICANN outs two more deadbeat new gTLDs
- .eu domains to be sold to non-residents
ICANN says no to Bulgarian ccTLD
Kevin Murphy,
May 19, 2010, 12:33:42 (UTC),
Domain Registries
Bulgaria can not have a localized-script version of its country-code domain .bg, because it looks too much like Brazil’s current ccTLD.
Bulgarian business daily Dnevnik is reporting that ICANN has turned down Bulgaria’s request for .бг, the Cyrillic translation of .bg, because it looks very much like .br.
Part of ICANN’s internationalized domain name fast-track process checks whether applied-for strings could be visually confusing. Clearly, this is one of them.
Russia, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have already passed the test and have active IDN ccTLDs.
The Bulgarians are not giving up, however. Dnevnik reports that the country will most likely apply for .бгр instead.
Pick up rifle .. aim at foot .. fire!
ICANN’s rules about similarity of strings are one example where the Article 10 rights of the Applicant are engaged.
That is the say, the right of Bulgarians to freely express themselves, with a string of their choice to identify their country and/or culture.
Of course the right is not absolute, but qualified, but ICANN rules appear to embed an assumption of cultural superiority that implies that the Latin alphabet is somehow superior to the Cyrllic.
Where a public authority from a Member State is involved in such a decision (and most of the Council of Europe governments do participate in ICANN), they should consider carefully the balance that the Convention requires public authorities to draw between Article 10 and the other Convention rights.
Let’s hope the Council of Europe can educate ICANN once it joins the GAC this month!
Thanks for your comments Nigel.
I’m not sure I’d agree about the implicit cultural superiority of the Latin script.
I think ICANN’s call is simply a case of “first, do no harm”.
The ASCII ccTLDs were around long before ICANN. If the DNS were being designed today, I’d expect it would look very different.
You are referring to Dnevnik… Dnevnik is referring to a spokesman of the IT department of the Bulgarian government… The IT dept has not published that document in their web site.
Everyone is referring, but no one has seen it. No link. No fac-simile. Nothing.
I would like to see some explicit link to the official icann’s resolution. Please, help me to find it, if their is such document produced.
I don’t think ICANN has published a document on this issue.
Information relating to the delegation and redelgation of ccTLDs is usually treated relatively secretively.
If they did, you’d probably find it here:
http://icann.org/en/topics/idn/fast-track/announcements-en.htm
Thank you for the reply, Kevin. So far there is nothing. So I believe this Dnevnik saga is sort of anticipated manipulation.
[…] first choice, .бг, was rejected by ICANN/IANA in May due to its visual similarity to another ccTLD, believed to be Brazil’s […]
[…] rejected the string earlier this year due to its confusing similarity to Brazil’s ccTLD, […]
[…] this year, Bulgaria had its request for .бг (.bg) declined on the grounds that it looks too much like Brazil’s Latin ccTLD, .br and said it planned to […]
[…] string was rejected in May due to its what ICANN determined was its confusing visual similarity with Brazil’s ccTLD, […]
[…] domain, which had the backing of the Bulgarian government and people, was rejected in May on the grounds that it is “confusingly similar to an existing TLD”, believed to be […]
[…] readers will be familiar with the story of how Bulgaria’s request for .бг was rejected due to its similar to Brazil’s .br, but to my knowledge the Greeks had not revealed their […]
[…] country’s application for the Cyrillic label was rejected by ICANN’s IDN ccTLD Fast Track program last year because it was found to look too similar to […]
[…] country’s application for the Cyrillic label was rejected by ICANN’s IDN ccTLD Fast Track program last year because it was found to look too similar to […]