Recent Posts
- ICANN got hacked by crypto bots
- Revenue dips as Brexit whacks .eu in 2018
- auDA rejects domaining ban but approves second-level domains
- KPMG dumps .com for dot-brand gTLD
- David and Goliath? DotMusic confirms .music win
- Neustar loses most of its Amazon back-end biz to Nominet
- ICANN takes the reins again as .amazon talks fail
- Italian bank is the latest dot-brand to bow out
- .music update: I’m calling it for Costa
- ICA opposes Aussie domaining ban
- “Just give up!” ICANN tells its most stubborn new gTLD applicant
- Did Roussos pull off the impossible? Google, Donuts, Radix all drop out of .music race
- “Stringent” new online censorship law could affect domain companies
- Looks like .music is finally on its way
- .blog tops 200,000 regs due to WordPress partnership
- .london disaster leads to mixed 2018 for MMX
- ICANN waves goodbye to Adobe Connect over security, pricing
- Donuts raises prices on most TLDs by up to 9%
- .com outsells new gTLDs by 2:1 in 2018
- CentralNic gets 680,000 AlpNames domains for free, kinda
- NameSilo nets $1.5 million profit
- Registry offers “$2,500” in sweeteners for .inc registrants
- Most .uk registrants not interested in .uk
- Australia likely to BAN domaining
- Root servers whacked after crypto change
- XYZ weighs into Epik controversy with .monster fundraising domain
- After NZ shooting, Epik has a Monster PR problem
- Another dot-brand bites the dust
- Whois vacuum AppDetex raises $10 million
- The DNS’s former overseer now has its own domain name
- Tucows splurges $30 million on Ascio
- UDRP complaints hit new high at WIPO
- .vu to relaunch under mystery new registry
- AlpNames could get PAID for abandoning its customers
- O.com might be a one-off for Verisign
- Andruff escalates Disspain feud, asks ICANN to ban him from chair
- Rumors swirl as AlpNames suffers “days” of downtime
- ICANN plays tough over Amazon dot-brands
- Data beats Merdinger to head universal acceptance group
- Radix sees revenue up 30%
- Verisign gets approval to sell O.com for $7.85
- At eleventh hour, most .uk registrants still don’t own their .uk names
- Mohan takes the reins at Afilias
- Trademark posse fails to block Whois privacy policy
- Nevett headhunts top execs from three rivals
- Internet to lose its .co.ck? Cook Islands mulls name change
- Donuts founder replaces Pitts as MMX’s premium guru
- Phishing still on the decline, despite Whois privacy
- Registrars given six months to deploy Whois killer
- Neustar completes .in migration
ICANN says no to Bulgarian ccTLD
Kevin Murphy,
May 19, 2010, 12:33:42 (UTC),
Domain Registries
Bulgaria can not have a localized-script version of its country-code domain .bg, because it looks too much like Brazil’s current ccTLD.
Bulgarian business daily Dnevnik is reporting that ICANN has turned down Bulgaria’s request for .бг, the Cyrillic translation of .bg, because it looks very much like .br.
Part of ICANN’s internationalized domain name fast-track process checks whether applied-for strings could be visually confusing. Clearly, this is one of them.
Russia, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have already passed the test and have active IDN ccTLDs.
The Bulgarians are not giving up, however. Dnevnik reports that the country will most likely apply for .бгр instead.
Pick up rifle .. aim at foot .. fire!
ICANN’s rules about similarity of strings are one example where the Article 10 rights of the Applicant are engaged.
That is the say, the right of Bulgarians to freely express themselves, with a string of their choice to identify their country and/or culture.
Of course the right is not absolute, but qualified, but ICANN rules appear to embed an assumption of cultural superiority that implies that the Latin alphabet is somehow superior to the Cyrllic.
Where a public authority from a Member State is involved in such a decision (and most of the Council of Europe governments do participate in ICANN), they should consider carefully the balance that the Convention requires public authorities to draw between Article 10 and the other Convention rights.
Let’s hope the Council of Europe can educate ICANN once it joins the GAC this month!
Thanks for your comments Nigel.
I’m not sure I’d agree about the implicit cultural superiority of the Latin script.
I think ICANN’s call is simply a case of “first, do no harm”.
The ASCII ccTLDs were around long before ICANN. If the DNS were being designed today, I’d expect it would look very different.
You are referring to Dnevnik… Dnevnik is referring to a spokesman of the IT department of the Bulgarian government… The IT dept has not published that document in their web site.
Everyone is referring, but no one has seen it. No link. No fac-simile. Nothing.
I would like to see some explicit link to the official icann’s resolution. Please, help me to find it, if their is such document produced.
I don’t think ICANN has published a document on this issue.
Information relating to the delegation and redelgation of ccTLDs is usually treated relatively secretively.
If they did, you’d probably find it here:
http://icann.org/en/topics/idn/fast-track/announcements-en.htm
Thank you for the reply, Kevin. So far there is nothing. So I believe this Dnevnik saga is sort of anticipated manipulation.
[…] first choice, .бг, was rejected by ICANN/IANA in May due to its visual similarity to another ccTLD, believed to be Brazil’s […]
[…] rejected the string earlier this year due to its confusing similarity to Brazil’s ccTLD, […]
[…] this year, Bulgaria had its request for .бг (.bg) declined on the grounds that it looks too much like Brazil’s Latin ccTLD, .br and said it planned to […]
[…] string was rejected in May due to its what ICANN determined was its confusing visual similarity with Brazil’s ccTLD, […]
[…] domain, which had the backing of the Bulgarian government and people, was rejected in May on the grounds that it is “confusingly similar to an existing TLD”, believed to be […]
[…] readers will be familiar with the story of how Bulgaria’s request for .бг was rejected due to its similar to Brazil’s .br, but to my knowledge the Greeks had not revealed their […]
[…] country’s application for the Cyrillic label was rejected by ICANN’s IDN ccTLD Fast Track program last year because it was found to look too similar to […]
[…] country’s application for the Cyrillic label was rejected by ICANN’s IDN ccTLD Fast Track program last year because it was found to look too similar to […]