Recent Posts
- Yanks beat Aussies to accountancy gTLD
- Surprise! Most private Whois look-ups come from Facebook
- Google launches .dev with some big-name anchor tenants
- The internet is about to get a lot gayer
- Claims UDRP has cost over $360 million so far
- Ironic eight-figure deal marks more Euro-registrar consolidation
- Court rules generic dictionary domains CAN be trademarked
- ICANN director Burr leaving Neustar
- Right of the colon? IDN getting killed over dot confusion
- Despite Afilias lawsuit, Neustar names date for Indian takeaway
- Endurance domain revenue dips
- After ICANN knockback, Amazon countries agree to .amazon talks
- Operation September Thrust leads to another million-domain Radix gTLD
- Brexit blamed as .eu hits six-year low
- CentralNic expects flat profit as revenue almost doubles
- XYZ reveals .monster gTLD launch dates
- Huge batch of Afilias TLDs approved in China
- .SE sells off $3.2 million registrar biz
- ICANN picks Seattle for public meeting
- ICANN approves two new TLDs, including THAT one
- MMX sees better profits than expected
- Pay up or sell up, ICANN tells failing new gTLD
- Brexit boost for Irish domains
- Brexit won’t just affect Brits, .eu registry says
- New domain price guessing game warns against “asshole domain squatters”
- Nazis rejoice! A TLD for you could be coming soon
- ICANN creates female-heavy anti-harassment team
- ICANN chief gets $100k bonus
- ICANN puts deadline on .amazon talks
- Crunch Whois privacy talks kick off
- Another failing gTLD not paying its “onerous” dues
- .CLUB announces three years of price increases
- How new gTLD auctions could kill gaming for good
- .amazon domain isn’t a slam dunk after all
- Chile opens .cl to all ICANN registrars
- “Please send women!” ICANN board urges
- NamesCon names con speakers
- Dark horse NameSilo doubles size in 2018
- UK tells .eu registrants to lawyer up as no-deal Brexit looms
- Radix now has China approval for whole TLD stable
- The most-read stories of 2018
- Another bundle of joy for XYZ as Johnson & Johnson throws out the .baby
- Now even parked domains will have GDPR notices
- ICANN budget predicts small new gTLD recovery and slowing legacy growth
- Verisign says Afilias tried to “rig” $135 million .web auction
- Exclusive gang of 10 to work on making ICANN the Whois gatekeeper
- Governments blast ICANN over Amazon gTLDs
- No more free transfers in Denmark
- ICANN outs two more deadbeat new gTLDs
- .eu domains to be sold to non-residents
Two more new gTLD bids bite the dust
ICANN appears to have formally killed off two new gTLD applications that had asked for subsidized application fees.
The bids for .idn and .ummah both failed to meet the criteria of ICANN’s Applicant Support Program back in March, but were only officially marked as dead over the weekend.
The .ummah application was voluntarily withdrawn by Ummah Digital, while the applicant for .idn (an Indian company called NameShop) unsuccessfully fought the decision.
Nevertheless, NameShop has now been flagged on ICANN’s site with “Did not meet all criteria” for the Applicant Support Program.
We’re taking this as a signal it’s been officially kicked out of the current application round and have updated the DI PRO database accordingly.
As well as failing applicant support, NameShop would have failed the Geographic Names component of its Initial Evaluation because IDN is the reserved three-letter country code for Indonesia.
NameShop had attempted to change its application from .idn to .internet — something that would no doubt have cause a deal of consternation among potential objectors and other applicants.
By flunking the company on the applicant support criteria, ICANN has luckily avoided having to make that difficult call.
Recent Comments
"Company well-known for abuse of personal data has insatiable appetite for personal data" - what a surprise.... read more
If 7 figures for MMX includes a decimal point you may be accurate. At this point with the success of new TLDs , could ... read more
SO what you are saying is most don't defend, but when they do its expensive and they win. So in most cases the ones that... read more
It is still in their Universal Terms of Service: "GoDaddy also reserves the right to charge you reasonable “administr... read more
In point of fact, several registrars charge their customers an administrative fee for handling UDRP disputes. -----... read more
The idea of having respondents pay $500 has a couple of flaws. First, in many of these dead-on cases the respondent n... read more
Respondents also incur an economic cost when due to a UDRP process with multiple layers of bias in favor of TM interests... read more
"Registrants, on the other hand, pay only for their own defence, if any." Mr. Wood ignores the fact that domain regis... read more
The key factor in the decision was a "Teflon survey" demonstrating that 75% of consumers associated booking.com with a p... read more
Page, see a separate comment below where I basically expanded on your statement, and presented an example where such a d... read more