Recent Posts
- ICANN’s new conferencing software has a webcam security bug
- ICANN explains how .org pricing decision was made
- CEO lost millions on Manhattan apartment deal just days before AlpNames went dark
- Zimbabwe wants to rebuild its domain market from scratch
- Net 4 India gets brief reprieve from ICANN suspension
- Luxembourg tops 100,000 .lu domains
- China domain smaller than expected
- Charities “could move to .ngo” if .org prices rise
- Airline hit with $230 million GDPR fine
- After five-year wait, .madrid domains coming this month
- Foreigners mostly speak foreign, ccTLD study finds
- .icu joins the million-domains club in one year, but spam triples
- Cloudflare “bug” reveals hundreds of secret domain prices
- .org now has no price caps, but “no specific plans” to raise prices
- CentralNic boosts reseller biz with $11.3 million Hexonet buy
- What happens in Vegas… gets released in .vegas
- ICANN gives .bj to Jeny
- 1.8 million UK grandfathers die after Nominet deadline hits
- .amazon frozen AGAIN as endless government games continue
- Afilias buys the other half of .global
- What time is it? For ICANN, even that can be a controversial question
- auDA reveals cut-off date for 2LD priority
- Nic.br wins dot-brand from Afilias
- Uniregistry offers dating-inspired buy-now domains
- .CLUB lowers premium prices to sell through registrars
- auDA chair racks off after just 18 months
- ICANN launches cash-for-kids scheme
- After $30 million deal, is a .voice gTLD now inevitable?
- Watch John Oliver take down voice.com’s buyer
- Record-breaking $30 million domain sale was financed by cryptocurrency
- .gay not coming out this year after all
- New gTLD registry is latest billion-dollar unicorn
- PwC wants to be your Whois gatekeeper
- .wang cut off with Chinese red tape
- This latest Chinese bubble could deflate ccTLD growth
- Dodgy registrars could be banned from .org promotions
- India’s largest registrar goes insolvent, gets suspended
- ZADNA CEO suspended for “hybrid misconduct”
- Brand kills off gTLD that is actually being USED
- Time for some more ICANN salary porn
- Smaller registrars say .uk release is biased towards the Big Boys
- New gTLDs slip again in Q1
- Second-level .au domains ARE coming soon
- .icu gets China nod as it tops 900,000 regs
- These 27 companies have ditched the .com for their dot-brand
- These are the 10 most-used dot-brands
- GRS has lost three million domains since Famous Four died
- Four presidents slam .amazon decision
- MMX makes $100,000 .luxe premium sale
- Major registries posting “fabricated” Whois data
Uniregistry beats Donuts to .shopping, but .shop still in play
Kevin Murphy,
January 18, 2016, 19:19:54 (UTC),
Domain Registries
Uniregistry has emerged as the successful registry-to-be of .shopping from the convoluted .shop/.shopping new gTLD contention set.
Donuts, the only competing applicant for the string, withdrew its application late last week.
As we previously reported, the .shop/.shopping contention sets were joined at the hip due to a bizarre string similarity challenge, making the scheduled auction very complex.
But Donuts and Uniregistry seem to have come to a private arrangement about .shopping, outside of the ICANN auction process, making .shop a straightforward nine-way fight.
Donuts tells me the auction, in which it is participating, is still scheduled for January 27.
Quite frankly I think everyone hopes donuts wins, as they are fair with pricing, and release selection.
Uniregistry simply blocks names, and prices them at $50K, the total opposite of what the GTLD process was setup for.
Also many rumblings with domains who are sick of taryn outbidding them with their own money on namejet etc… pick a business, and go with it, don’t piss on your own customers.
To each their own
I really hope Donuts will win the .shop.
Any string which belongs to Uniregistry I do not buy.
Schilling is well known for blocking names, registering through his other companies, placing ridiculous prices, saying something that is not true later etc.
People like Frank Schilling is better to avoid. It is beyond my understanding how some people can keep domains with Uniregistry… I am sure he spies on them, collect data etc.
I think the .shop and .shopping should be given to one registrar and I see .shopping doing better.
ICANN should have put all of these similar names into the same group. There should be just .shop or .shopping, not both.
It just adds confusion, but at least it adds extra funds to the not-for-profit ICANN, eh?
I think .shop is better than .shopping. The shorter the better when it comes to domain names – as long as it stays relevant.