Recent Posts
- Crunch Whois privacy talks kick off
- Another failing gTLD not paying its “onerous” dues
- .CLUB announces three years of price increases
- How new gTLD auctions could kill gaming for good
- .amazon domain isn’t a slam dunk after all
- Chile opens .cl to all ICANN registrars
- “Please send women!” ICANN board urges
- NamesCon names con speakers
- Dark horse NameSilo doubles size in 2018
- UK tells .eu registrants to lawyer up as no-deal Brexit looms
- Radix now has China approval for whole TLD stable
- The most-read stories of 2018
- Another bundle of joy for XYZ as Johnson & Johnson throws out the .baby
- Now even parked domains will have GDPR notices
- ICANN budget predicts small new gTLD recovery and slowing legacy growth
- Verisign says Afilias tried to “rig” $135 million .web auction
- Exclusive gang of 10 to work on making ICANN the Whois gatekeeper
- Governments blast ICANN over Amazon gTLDs
- No more free transfers in Denmark
- ICANN outs two more deadbeat new gTLDs
- .eu domains to be sold to non-residents
- DNS inventor says .luxe first innovation in a decade
- New gTLDs continue growth trend, but can it last?
- No .web until 2021 after Afilias files ICANN appeal
- Nevett lands at PIR
- ICANN attendance soars but “females” stay away
- Amazon countries fighting back against .amazon gTLD
- Exclusive: Tiny island sues to take control of lucrative .nu
- Belgium to crack down on fraud domains
- .cloud gets the China blessing
- Donuts backs away from .spa fight
- First chance to have your say on the future of Whois
- Uniregistry working on bulk trademark blocking service
- ICANN urged to reject .com price increases
- Nominet takes down 32,000 domains for IP infringement
- Hebrew .com off to a slow start
- Incel hate site jumps to Iceland after doMEn suspends .me domain
- ICANN probing Donuts and Tucows over anti-Jewish web site
- Bad.monster? Two more gTLDs have been acquired
- First non-brand gTLD to go dark
- Two controversial new gTLDs launching in January
- Afilias bought .io for $70 million
- Uniregistry calls for domain Bill of Rights as Schilling says Gab.com was not booted
- Wagner takes dig at Verisign as GoDaddy reports $310 million domain revenue
- Will ICANN take a bigger slice of the .com pie, or will .domainers get URS?
- Trump gives Verisign almost $1 billion in free money
- Kirikos lawyers up after ICANN etiquette fight
- This is how AppDetex works
- Amazon offered $5 million of free Kindles for .amazon gTLD
- US not happy with Donuts hiring Atallah
Uniregistry beats Donuts to .shopping, but .shop still in play
Kevin Murphy,
January 18, 2016, 19:19:54 (UTC),
Domain Registries
Uniregistry has emerged as the successful registry-to-be of .shopping from the convoluted .shop/.shopping new gTLD contention set.
Donuts, the only competing applicant for the string, withdrew its application late last week.
As we previously reported, the .shop/.shopping contention sets were joined at the hip due to a bizarre string similarity challenge, making the scheduled auction very complex.
But Donuts and Uniregistry seem to have come to a private arrangement about .shopping, outside of the ICANN auction process, making .shop a straightforward nine-way fight.
Donuts tells me the auction, in which it is participating, is still scheduled for January 27.
Quite frankly I think everyone hopes donuts wins, as they are fair with pricing, and release selection.
Uniregistry simply blocks names, and prices them at $50K, the total opposite of what the GTLD process was setup for.
Also many rumblings with domains who are sick of taryn outbidding them with their own money on namejet etc… pick a business, and go with it, don’t piss on your own customers.
To each their own
I really hope Donuts will win the .shop.
Any string which belongs to Uniregistry I do not buy.
Schilling is well known for blocking names, registering through his other companies, placing ridiculous prices, saying something that is not true later etc.
People like Frank Schilling is better to avoid. It is beyond my understanding how some people can keep domains with Uniregistry… I am sure he spies on them, collect data etc.
I think the .shop and .shopping should be given to one registrar and I see .shopping doing better.
ICANN should have put all of these similar names into the same group. There should be just .shop or .shopping, not both.
It just adds confusion, but at least it adds extra funds to the not-for-profit ICANN, eh?
I think .shop is better than .shopping. The shorter the better when it comes to domain names – as long as it stays relevant.